GDT: Game 12: Columbus vs. Winnipeg | 10/31 7PM EDT

futurcorerock

Registered User
Nov 15, 2003
6,831
0
Columbus, OH
You might be narrowly correct in terms of your rights as a consumer, but just don't expect it to help anything. Pay attention to the way players play when they're getting booed. It ain't pretty.
I agree that booing is but a drop in the bucket, especially when the real art of fan protest is showing indifference by not going to games or buying merchandise. But, the sentiment that fans shouldn't boo because it isn't helping is missing the point entirely.


Also don't forget, While it may have been a dead cat bounce in the end and was absurdism at its finest, that Occupy Nationwide protest did usher in some change for the team.
 

Aspie with attitude

Registered User
May 9, 2013
1,369
0
Just on the ice.

Columbus had guys dressed up as hockey players

So did Tampa Bay haha.

Speaking of Tampa
I got to watch a drunk Boston Bruins fan get punched in the mouth after taunting a group of Lighting fans after the game. Best thing was the Bolts fan that punched him was dressed up as Thor (sucks that he got arrested).
The moral of the story: DON'T EVER PISS OFF THOR

Thor-The-Dark-World-Synopsis-530x278.jpg


Regarding Columbus looking at the highlights, it is clear Torts needs to make major changes. We can't keep losing games like this.
 

Mayor Bee

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
18,087
535
Also don't forget, While it may have been a dead cat bounce in the end and was absurdism at its finest, that Occupy Nationwide protest did usher in some change for the team.

There were three teams near the bottom of the standings that year that had a GM under fire for one reason or another. One was the Islanders with Garth Snow. One was Winnipeg with Kevin Cheveldayoff (whose mantra seemed to be "do nothing and see what happens"). One was Columbus.

The former two teams kept their GMs despite fan outrage, and have seen that pay off as the consistent vision has turned their respective teams into legitimate contenders. The latter team did not.

That said, I will never dispute the passion of the people who showed up, and there are certainly some knowledgeable folks among them. I'm mentioning this only to point out that:
1) Not all change is good, even if it appears to be necessary, and
2) There's undoubtedly a ton that goes on behind the scenes that no one knows about
 
Last edited:

Aspie with attitude

Registered User
May 9, 2013
1,369
0
I agree that booing is but a drop in the bucket, especially when the real art of fan protest is showing indifference by not going to games or buying merchandise. But, the sentiment that fans shouldn't boo because it isn't helping is missing the point entirely.


Also don't forget, While it may have been a dead cat bounce in the end and was absurdism at its finest, that Occupy Nationwide protest did usher in some change for the team.

If the Jackets keep like they are they won't have to worry about being booed because the arena will be almost as empty as a turkey farm on Thanksgiving.
 

Dednimnepo

Winning is the Fun
Oct 23, 2007
767
0
Columbus
Regarding Columbus looking at the highlights, it is clear Torts needs to make major changes. We can't keep losing games like this.

Sure we can! Embrace the suck! Instead of watching for the win count how many ways a hard working* team can under perform.


*It is fascinating but we are hard working (like a guy pounding screws in with a hammer.)
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,701
26,750
Best team in franchise history, most talent in franchise history, and we're a joke. My god. This season is tearing my fandom of hockey apart
 

futurcorerock

Registered User
Nov 15, 2003
6,831
0
Columbus, OH
There were three teams near the bottom of the standings that year that had a GM under fire for one reason or another. One was the Islanders with Garth Snow. One was Winnipeg with Kevin Cheveldayoff (whose mantra seemed to be "do nothing and see what happens"). One was Columbus.

The former two teams kept their GMs despite fan outrage, and have seen that pay off as the consistent vision has turned their respective teams into legitimate contenders. The latter team did not.

...but the problem is patience wasn't a hallmark of Scott Howson's regime either -- The same kind of patience that might have been well served with Scott Howson hanging on to Jake Voracek, instead of foolishly reaching for Jeff Carter and spending another 4 years searching for Johansen's co-pilot, which led to the Horton contract, and by virtue of fate David Clarkson's contract.

Keeping Scott Howson around with that bit of context still sounds like a terrible idea in hindsight, and that's when you try to swallow that narrative Portzline trots out when the team is playing well about how many draft picks of his are still here.
 

DJA

over the horizon radar
Sponsor
Apr 17, 2002
21,064
5,896
Beyond the Infinite
Torts, in his press conference, already seems baffled.

"This is a team right now where it's a chore to make even a simple play."
 

Mayor Bee

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
18,087
535
...but the problem is patience wasn't a hallmark of Scott Howson's regime either -- The same kind of patience that might have been well served with Scott Howson hanging on to Jake Voracek, instead of foolishly reaching for Jeff Carter and spending another 4 years searching for Johansen's co-pilot, which led to the Horton contract, and by virtue of fate David Clarkson's contract.

That's a pretty extreme reach, and I'm someone who was opposed to the Voracek/Carter deal from the start. It's entirely possible that Voracek was going to end up in the same boat as Brule, Filatov, and Zherdev as players who showed flashes early, but never really progressed.

To pin the Horton signing on Howson by virtue of Voracek/Carter is...well, I'll be diplomatic and say that I strongly disagree. And then to toss Clarkson in there at all is insane.
 

CBJ panick

Registered User
Oct 31, 2015
21
0
I'd be willing to trade Johansen for an all-star caliber defenseman at this point. THERE... I said it.

I'm with lee. Although it may not be popular you have to give something to get something and if were out of it ryjo with his contract looming may be our best piece. Having said that I know my opinion would not be a popular one.
 

Mayor Bee

Registered User
Dec 29, 2008
18,087
535
Just so there's no confusion here, the suggestion that I'm seeing is to trade:
- A legitimate #1 center (the first in franchise history)
- who just turned 23 years old
- who has 59 goals and 134 points in the last two seasons

Because of a single ten-game stretch to start a season?
 

CBJ panick

Registered User
Oct 31, 2015
21
0
Just so there's no confusion here, the suggestion that I'm seeing is to trade:
- A legitimate #1 center (the first in franchise history)
- who just turned 23 years old
- who has 59 goals and 134 points in the last two seasons

Because of a single ten-game stretch to start a season?

I'm simply suggesting a guy who we still have to pay a huge contract to may be looked at to see what he's worth. I don't mean to pick on him I just see him as our best chance of getting a #1 Dman. Could I ask what a better way to get a #1 Dman be?
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
Just so there's no confusion here, the suggestion that I'm seeing is to trade:
- A legitimate #1 center (the first in franchise history)
- who just turned 23 years old
- who has 59 goals and 134 points in the last two seasons

Because of a single ten-game stretch to start a season?

That's incorrect. If we never had issues with Joey before we wouldn't be so quick to consider moving him.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad