RayP
Tf
- Jan 12, 2011
- 94,103
- 17,879
who plays G for the Hawks next year if we trade him and he resigns there
Would you resign here if you were him? I wouldn’t.
Not to mention we are clearly 2-3 years away at this point, if not more.
who plays G for the Hawks next year if we trade him and he resigns there
Would you resign here if you were him? I wouldn’t.
Not to mention we are clearly 2-3 years away at this point, if not more.
i hope they convince him that they're gonna get this right because he's their best signing in a long time...the leader they'll need to turn the team around...Toews praised his leadership tonight
Lehner for sure is a leader, what did Toews say?, never mind I will go look
He's moved around for awhile, maybe he actually does feel like there is something special in Chicago. I was under the impression the Hawks signed him to a one year deal as a try out for the starter for when Crawford is gone. But hey, what do I know... I just think the Lehner signing really was one of our best in a long time and it would suck to lose him. He is actually a quality player, hard to find good players in FA nowadays. They all want a crazy amount of money.Would you resign here if you were him? I wouldn’t.
Not to mention we are clearly 2-3 years away at this point, if not more.
I'm just here waiting on the Lehner post game quotes.
It’s obvious to say but if Toews hit the age curve you sell every asset you have.
Debrincat as well.Who do you keep? Dach, Boqvist, Mitchell, and Nylander?
Who do you keep? Dach, Boqvist, Mitchell, and Nylander?
Probably keep anyone under 23 years old.Who do you keep? Dach, Boqvist, Mitchell, and Nylander?
You have to keep Patrick Kane no?Who do you keep? Dach, Boqvist, Mitchell, and Nylander?
Where are you getting these tweets from? I wanna read hahaha"there seems to have been some miscommunication with brent, care to elaborate on that"... jc "whats the confusion"
The Blackhawks should send Dach back down.
I understand the desire to let him develop at an NHL level, but there's simply no reason to burn a year off his ELC on a roster that has no hope of contending for a playoff spot. From an asset management perspective, you're better off waiting until you can surround him with better and put him in a better situation to succeed and actually help the team toward something worthwhile at the NHL level.
Where are you getting these tweets from? I wanna read hahaha
But I thought Q was the problem.
So was it Bowman's cap mismanagement and the sale of countless assets due to that mismanagement after all?