TSN: Gaborik, Delisle, Parlett to CBJ for Brassard, Dorsett, Moore and 6th Round Pick

Status
Not open for further replies.

JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK

Twenty f*ckin years
Oct 8, 2010
79,464
16,900
If Gaborik is on his game, you'll love him...his stats are weak this year, but he has been playing well the last few games. Been snakebitten. I think he could have a huge bounceback season next year, and even heat up down the stretch with the trade. He works best when his teammates create space for him, and Columbus is a hard working team that creates space, much like the 11-12 Rangers. He had great success with Prospal in 2009-2010 as well.

What are your guy's opinion on Brassard? Interested in what kind of player he is, all I know is that he's skilled, decently productive C, and the Rangers need center depth. I know all about Dorsett, happy about getting him.
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,696
26,737
Aaron Portzline ‏@Aportzline 1m

#CBJ GM Jarmo Kekalainen says he sees Gaborik "as a long term solution, not just a short-term fix."

Aaron Portzline ‏@Aportzline 2m

#CBJ RW Vinny Prospal reached out to Gaborik earlier in the day.

Looks like he had to be convinced..
 

mt-svk

CBJ/OTT fan
Jun 6, 2007
6,869
0
I am not glad that we lose Moore and I am not sure how is Gaborik wealth but if good it is very good job IMHO :handclap:
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,696
26,737
If Gaborik is on his game, you'll love him...his stats are weak this year, but he has been playing well the last few games. Been snakebitten. I think he could have a huge bounceback season next year, and even heat up down the stretch with the trade. He works best when his teammates create space for him, and Columbus is a hard working team that creates space, much like the 11-12 Rangers. He had great success with Prospal in 2009-2010 as well.

What are your guy's opinion on Brassard? Interested in what kind of player he is, all I know is that he's skilled, decently productive C, and the Rangers need center depth. I know all about Dorsett, happy about getting him.

Brass is like Gabs. Very up and down. I think he can stil ldevelop into a 2 C with 50-60 points.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,771
3,808
Nash has way more talent then Gaborik. He's a better puck handler and a better passer. Gaborik does have a great shot and a real quick release. But Nash is a better player.

Not a shot at you Jan -- but I can't help but laugh at this statement. From about this point last year through the summer, Rangers fans consistently told us the exact opposite. :)
 

Ceremony

How I choose to feel is how I am
Jun 8, 2012
114,274
17,317
As an outsider, I think this is a bit much for Gaborik. But he should be coming to you with a point to prove, so I hope it works for you.
 

Samkow

Now do Classical Gas
Jul 4, 2002
16,354
488
Detroit
@cotsonika 4m
Gaborik on TSN: "It's good that somebody actually wants you on the team."

Doesn't sound happy with what transpired between him and Tortorella.
 

JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK

Twenty f*ckin years
Oct 8, 2010
79,464
16,900
Not a shot at you Jan -- but I can't help but laugh at this statement. From about this point last year through the summer, Rangers fans consistently told us the exact opposite. :)

From watching both, I disagree with his statement completely.

Gaborik is a better finisher than Nash. He's a garbage goal scorer. He goes to the net, bangs in rebounds, gets into the open space. He has terrible hands on the rush. They're completely different players, not comparale at all.
 

Robert

Foligno family
Mar 9, 2006
36,576
1,673
Louisville, KY
If Gaborik is on his game, you'll love him...his stats are weak this year, but he has been playing well the last few games. Been snakebitten. I think he could have a huge bounceback season next year, and even heat up down the stretch with the trade. He works best when his teammates create space for him, and Columbus is a hard working team that creates space, much like the 11-12 Rangers. He had great success with Prospal in 2009-2010 as well.

What are your guy's opinion on Brassard? Interested in what kind of player he is, all I know is that he's skilled, decently productive C, and the Rangers need center depth. I know all about Dorsett, happy about getting him.

Have past injuries slowed Gabby down?
 

Nordique

Add smoked meat, and we have a deal.
Aug 11, 2005
9,138
265
Ohio
Just realized Jackets actually still have all their 1st rounders.. And they have gaborik too. Not bad

I think kekäläinen did this partly for income.. Doesn't gaborik bring more ticket sales, than the guys who were traded. Gabo will sell sum tickets next year / bring intrest.

Probably not, besides winning more games which I hope is a by product of the trade.

Gaborik isn't a Super Star that will bring marginal fans into the arena based on his name. The name recognition is there, but only among hockey fans, and most of us are buying tickets already.
 

JanErixon20

Registered User
Aug 7, 2007
814
0
Not a shot at you Jan -- but I can't help but laugh at this statement. From about this point last year through the summer, Rangers fans consistently told us the exact opposite. :)

:laugh:

I'm just going by what I've seen with my own eyes. Gaborik is a pure sniper, but Nash has a lot more skill. Just going by what I've seen.

Gaborik earned a lot of credit with me last spring playing with an injury that would have kept us from combing our hair (if people still use combs). Not taking anything from him, but Nash is the better *all around* player.
 

Jackets16

Registered User
Jan 7, 2005
12,018
619
Aaron Portzline ‏@Aportzline 2m

#CBJ RW Vinny Prospal reached out to Gaborik earlier in the day.

Looks like he had to be convinced..

Pretty sure that happens with most trades involving guys with NTC or NMC. Maybe not, but that is what I would think.
 

KallioWeHardlyKnewYe

Hey! We won!
May 30, 2003
15,771
3,808
From watching both, I disagree with his statement completely.

Gaborik is a better finisher than Nash. He's a garbage goal scorer. He goes to the net, bangs in rebounds, gets into the open space. He has terrible hands on the rush. They're completely different players, not comparale at all.

That wasn't the point I was making.

I actually think Nash is the better player as well. Was just pointing out that when the players were on the other teams, many a Rangers fan kept telling us that Gaborik was better.
 

Samkow

Now do Classical Gas
Jul 4, 2002
16,354
488
Detroit
@Aportzline 1m

#CBJ RW Marian Gaborik will wear No. 10. Mark Letestu will switch to No. 55.

3rd Number switch in 9 months for Letestu. Who does he think he is, Duvie Westcott? :shakehead
 

JanErixon20

Registered User
Aug 7, 2007
814
0
From watching both, I disagree with his statement completely.

Gaborik is a better finisher than Nash. He's a garbage goal scorer. He goes to the net, bangs in rebounds, gets into the open space. He has terrible hands on the rush. They're completely different players, not comparale at all.

As I said in post 189, Gaborik is a sniper. Nash has more talent. He controls the puck better and can pass it better.

And in my original post I said Gaborik has the better shot and quicker release.
 

JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK

Twenty f*ckin years
Oct 8, 2010
79,464
16,900
Have past injuries slowed Gabby down?

I think his shoulder injury has hurt him a little this year. I expect him to recover and still be a 30 goal scorer, though, he hasn't ben relying on his shot the last while. He's a smart player, he adjusts when he needs to. That said, he's limited. Not a puck control player, not someone who will carry the puck and start the play. He is an elite finisher and gets into open spots on the ice like no other, though. H
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad