Confirmed with Link: G Ilya Samsonov heads to arbitration (Awarded 1 year, $3.55M)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
I agree on both accounts.

How about solving both our goalie problems at the same time..

My proposal is Sammy RFA rights + 1st round pick + Nic Robertson + Matt Murray to Philly for Carter Hart.

Because Sammy is in the arbitration process it opens a buyout window for Philly and then they buyout Matt Murray and take the dead cap space hit instead of the Leafs.

The cap space the Leafs recovered from trading Murray $4.687 mil covers Cart Hart's current contract @ $3,979,000 (1 year left) and then RFA .. Then Leafs can work on an extension with Hart.

So how much would it cost in assets to get someone else to take the Murray contract and acquire Carter Hart at the same time to make him the Leafs goalie of the future. A rebuilding team like Philly would want some young assets and pick(s) and could take next year's $2.0 dead cap space from a buyout,

weird, based on GSAx and just about every stat you've used recently to show us Samsanov is going to ask for 5+ million, Samsanov > Hart... why would you want to trade the better goalie + picks/prospects?
 
I don't think a player elected arbitration decision is bound by any dollar amounts, purely the discretion of the arbitrator based on evidence given. Nothing I see. Some caveats on club elected first window arbitration awards.
 
Last edited:
I don't think a player elected arbitration decision is bound by any dollar amounts, purely the discretion of the arbitrator based on evidence given. Nothing I see. Some caveats on club elected first window arbitration awards.

The only binding elements is the contract can be no less than 85% of the previous season and the team has the option to walk away from the player is awarded around 4.5-4.6 mil (I can't quite remember the exact amount).

Neither of those should be a concern for Samsonov.

I also suspect he'll have a contract completed before the arbitration meeting regardless
 
weird, based on GSAx and just about every stat you've used recently to show us Samsanov is going to ask for 5+ million, Samsanov > Hart... why would you want to trade the better goalie + picks/prospects?
The Samsonov ask is not my speculation its what is being reported. Like this for example

Sports Illustrated's David Alter appeared on TSN 1050's Game Play on Monday to discuss the Leafs/Samsonov situtation. Alter mentioned a few comparables that the Leafs and Samsonov could look at to help them on their quest to lock up the RFA goaltender. Alter revealed three goaltenders who signed new deals coming out of restricted free agency whom he feels that the Samsonov camp could use as examples. Those 3 goalies are Jake Oettinger ($4M AAV), Juuse Saros ($5M AAV) and, on the low end, Alexandar Georgiev ($3.6M AAV).

As far as what Samsonov's AAV on his new deal will be, that's certainly up for debate, but a number below $4M is likely what the Leafs are looking for, with Samsonov likely pushing for slightly above $4M. We'll see how this all plays out over the next week or so here.

1689206099029.png
 
I’ve read people say in arbitration they will settle for this or that. But as far as I’m aware the arbitrator doesn’t pick a number both sides give a number and he picks one or the other so if the leafs put 3 million and Sammy puts in 4 the arbitrator doesn’t come back and say 3.25. He picks either the leafs 3 million or Sammy’s 4 mill

The NHL does not have “winner take all“ arbitration like MLB does.

The NHL arbitrator can pick any number, including one outside the range of the player and team salary requests.
 
The Samsonov ask is not my speculation its what is being reported. Like this for example

Sports Illustrated's David Alter appeared on TSN 1050's Game Play on Monday to discuss the Leafs/Samsonov situtation. Alter mentioned a few comparables that the Leafs and Samsonov could look at to help them on their quest to lock up the RFA goaltender. Alter revealed three goaltenders who signed new deals coming out of restricted free agency whom he feels that the Samsonov camp could use as examples. Those 3 goalies are Jake Oettinger ($4M AAV), Juuse Saros ($5M AAV) and, on the low end, Alexandar Georgiev ($3.6M AAV).

As far as what Samsonov's AAV on his new deal will be, that's certainly up for debate, but a number below $4M is likely what the Leafs are looking for, with Samsonov likely pushing for slightly above $4M. We'll see how this all plays out over the next week or so here.

View attachment 728450

Spencer Knight ($4.5m) is another interesting one. Yes he has a higher pedigree and is younger than Samsonov, but pedigree isn’t an admissible category in salary arbitration.

Also worth noting they can use player RFA comparables even if the player is no longer playing under the comparable contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MarkovsKnee
Spencer Knight ($4.5m) is another interesting one. Yes he has a higher pedigree and is younger than Samsonov, but pedigree isn’t an admissible category in salary arbitration.
His name also likely to come up in Arb comparison talks should it get that far.

Sammy asking for a # in the $4 mil range based on RFA comparables does not seem unrealistic.. His personal #'s in key goaltending categories were quite strong.
 
It’s a small sample size, but historically arbitrators appear to issue higher awards when a player is one year away from UFA.

What would the floor be on Samsonov? Searching through the current list of RFA goaltenders some names that pop up:
- Georgiev $3.4m, had a longer history of solid production, but Samsonov with significantly better performance in the contract year.
- Vanacek $3.4m
- Kahkonen $2.75m
- Skinner $2.6m, but keep in mind he got this deal based on his 2021-22 production, not 2022-23.

Without doing a thorough research my first instinct is the arbitration award floor may be somewhere around $3.2m. With the potential to maybe top out around $4m? It’s difficult to guess how much Samsonov’s exemplary 2022-23 GAA and SV% might be offset by the GP sample size, both for his entire career and 2022-23
 
The only binding elements is the contract can be no less than 85% of the previous season and the team has the option to walk away from the player is awarded around 4.5-4.6 mil (I can't quite remember the exact amount).

Neither of those should be a concern for Samsonov.

I also suspect he'll have a contract completed before the arbitration meeting regardless
$4.53-something this year for walking from decision, I looked it up earlier in the thread and others have posted it too, ya.

85% minimum to my eyes is only a stipulation on club elected arbitration in first window. 100% minimum on club elected 2nd window award looks like. But no constraints at all on player elected.

And yes all academic, expect a negotiated contract prior to arbitration too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Menzinger
It’s a small sample size, but historically arbitrators appear to issue higher awards when a player is one year away from UFA.

What would the floor be on Samsonov? Searching through the current list of RFA goaltenders some names that pop up:
- Georgiev $3.4m, had a longer history of solid production, but Samsonov with significantly better performance in the contract year.
- Vanacek $3.4m
- Kahkonen $2.75m
- Skinner $2.6m, but keep in mind he got this deal based on his 2021-22 production, not 2022-23.

Without doing a thorough research my first instinct is the arbitration award floor may be somewhere around $3.2m. With the potential to maybe top out around $4m? It’s difficult to guess how much Samsonov’s exemplary 2022-23 GAA and SV% might be offset by the GP sample size, both for his entire career and 2022-23
I'd be surprised if this case made it through the Arb process as it almost seems Leafs wanted Sammy to file so they get an 2nd buyout window if needed for Murray, as opposed to both sides being far apart on player evaluation.

However it would be somewhat difficult depending on how much faith and trust the Leafs have in Sammy to buy 1 RFA year and then several UFA years perhaps what that $ might be, on a new extension with some term. Pure guess but $3.5 mil value on RFA year and $4.5 mil UFA 1 year and $4.75 mil UFA 2 year, so a 3 year deal at $12.75 mil = $4.25 mil AAV.

Based on projected cap increases of +$4 mil 2024-25 & +$4.5 mil in 2025-26 ( = $92 mil Cap Ceiling).
 
Last edited:
I'd be surprised if this case made it through the Arb process as it almost seems Leafs wanted Sammy to file so they get an 2nd buyout window if needed for Murray, as opposed to both sides being far apart on player evaluation.

However it would be somewhat difficult depending on how much faith and trust the Leafs have in Sammy to buy 1 RFA year and then several UFA years perhaps what that $ might be, on a new extension with some term. Pure guess but $3.5 mil value on RFA year and $4.5 mil UFA 1 year and $4.75 mil UFA 2 year, so a 3 year deal at $12.75 mil = $4.25 mil AAV.

Based on projected cap increases of +$4 mil 2024-25 & +$4.5 mil in 2025-26 ( = $92 mil Cap Ceiling).

I don’t expect it to go to arbitration either. Still useful to estimate what an arbitration ruling could look like because you rarely see players sign for significantly less to avoid arbitration.
 
Friedman also reported that he believes that the Maple Leafs don’t want to go beyond a three-year extension with restricted free-agent goaltender Ilya Samsonov. The Maple Leafs and Samsonov are expected to go to arbitration on July 21, meaning that arbitration numbers will be exchanged tomorrow morning. The 26-year-old netminder was terrific in his first season with Toronto posting a .919 save percentage to go along with a 2.33 goals-against average and a 27-10-5 record. The Maple Leafs are currently over the salary cap meaning that they will need to shuffle around money to fit in Samsonov’s new deal when it is completed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542
Hearing is Friday? Surprised they haven’t settled yet.
 
Wow, pretty big gap.
Does the ruling have to be one or the other?
Nope not in Hockey, Arbitrator can pick any # from floor to ceiling. :)

Interesting side note though If Sammy gets his ask, at that level the Leafs can walk away and make him a UFA.

Arbitration Ruling: Player elected Arbitration Settlements of 1 year and greater than $4,538,958 in 2023, Club can walk away from the awarded salary, making the player a UFA

Matt Murray makes $4.687 mil, so you can see why Sammy's ask is above that.
 
Not a bad range. These things typically end up pretty close to the middle, which would be about $3.5m.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACC1224
Even meeting in the middle at $3.65M, the Leafs will be $6.85M over the cap.

If they manage to lose Murray's full cap hit, they're still at $2.1M over.
Likely would have to lose Timmons, and go with a 20 man roster to fit.

With those moves, and running a 20 man roster they'll be under the cap by $80,000 with a lineup of:

Bertuzzi Matthews Marner
Domi Tavares Nylander
Knies Kampf Janrkrok
Robertson Gambrell Reaves

Rielly Brodie
McCabe Klingberg
Giodano Liljegren

Samsonov
Woll

Or, If Domi is 3C, they can go with this lineup and have $500,000 in cap space.

Bertuzzi Matthews Marner
Knies Tavares Nylander
Robertson Domi Jarnkrok
Lafferty Kampf Reaves

Rielly Brodie
McCabe Klingberg
Giodano Liljegren

Samsonov
Woll
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad