GDT: Free Agent Frenzy

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Then, he will be playing because the kids didn't beat him out, exactly as I said.

It will be a less than ideal solution, no doubt. But also why they acquired him.

I don’t think you are getting why I’m upset. I’m not upset that we signed a veteran dman for the very purpose you are describing. I’m upset that we signed the absolute WORST one available. And that’s exactly what we did by every metric.
 
I don’t think you are getting why I’m upset. I’m not upset that we signed a veteran dman for the very purpose you are describing. I’m upset that we signed the absolute WORST one available. And that’s exactly what we did by every metric.
Well, like I said, he wouldn't have been my choice, but my suspicion is that they were looking at a small handful of guys who would take a 1-year, ~$1MM deal, and while JJ is probably not the best, given the role, they went for the guy who knew Martin's system and who they were confident had the personality for the job.

Anyone meaningfully better would certainly be getting more dollars and likely more years.
 
Well, like I said, he wouldn't have been my choice, but my suspicion is that they were looking at a small handful of guys who would take a 1-year, ~$1MM deal, and while JJ is probably not the best, given the role, they went for the guy who knew Martin's system and who they were confident had the personality for the job.

Anyone meaningfully better would certainly be getting more dollars and likely more years.

Exactly. How many options were there for cheap guys looking to sign a 1 year deal? Certainly nobody promising.
 
Well yeah. I mean why would a team trade a ready 2C for Strome? Kind of defeats the purpose.
No one that’s why I said one isn’t coming back. As for the purpose, it would only be if Stromes arb would be walk away level which in my mind is prob 4.5 or lower and we lose him for nothing.
 
Imagine signing Johnson and then following it up 5 mins later with a guy that’s equally as terrible in Bitetto? You almost have to do it on purpose

the rangers OWE us a Strome blowout today after putting us thru that yesterday

Strome doesn’t suck that bad .... he’s gonna get potentially like 1 million too much for 1 year. If he goes fine but they better have a replacement
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daves a mess
Frankly, the immeasurable over-reaction to the JJ signing is a bad look for us fans ... 1m/1y deal and people act like it's the end of the f***ing world.

A bad look for fans to complain about their team? Lol. Come on. Thats a new one.

no it’s a bad look for our management. We’re being laughed at everywhere for this move.

you want veteran guys that are going to help the core young guys. This guy will hurt them. We complained about Staal? This guy is that much worse.
 
Exactly. How many options were there for cheap guys looking to sign a 1 year deal? Certainly nobody promising.
Merrill, Pouliot, and Sbisa are names that come to mind, not confidence inspiring but better than JJ? Also Beaulieu got 2 yrs at 1.25, takes care of Exp draft and nice spare to have around when the kids arrive. That being said, JJ signing is not the end of the world although it’s fun to posture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kovalev27
I like that edge mentioned Granlund yesterday I’m hoping he’s a target if you move out Strome that would be a great decision
 
I more want the spot open for Chytil. I’d like us to sign a bottom 6 center. There’s still a couple options out there.
Agree would love Haula, he’s a Finn correct? Good for Kakko. He’s the kind of guy you need to compliment top skill. Would settle for Soderberg cheaply 1 yr I suppose.
 
Haula sucks guys.

Frankly, the immeasurable over-reaction to the JJ signing is a bad look for us fans ... 1m/1y deal and people act like it's the end of the f***ing world.

it’s not, but they basically got rid of a really bad defenseman and replaced him with a really bad defenseman.

like there are a zillion options who could have been picked up for similar money. It was a given that they’d do something stupid this offseason but I thought it would be Matt Martin stupid, not Jack Johnson stupid.

it’s the continued overvaluing of stuff and things in lieu of being able to play the game that is worrisome. On its own, this deal isn’t going to ruin the offseason and anyone who thinks they’ll play Jack Johnson over a “ready” K’Andre Miller is crazy, but it’s a trend that I hoped was finally broken the second they shipped Staal out of town. Those attributes are fantastic when combined with ability, it’s part of what separates Lafreniere from his peers, but Jack Johnson is not able to play at this level.
 
I hope people here are prepared for the return on Strome to be minimal- we are not filling a legitimate hole on this roster through that move (though maybe thru a subsequent trade or Haula signing type thing).
 
Hardly any legit FA goalie options out there anymore. Teams still needing a goalie will start to look for a trade.
 
Haula sucks guys.



it’s not, but they basically got rid of a really bad defenseman and replaced him with a really bad defenseman.

like there are a zillion options who could have been picked up for similar money. It was a given that they’d do something stupid this offseason but I thought it would be Matt Martin stupid, not Jack Johnson stupid.

it’s the continued overvaluing of stuff and things in lieu of being able to play the game that is worrisome. On its own, this deal isn’t going to ruin the offseason and anyone who thinks they’ll play Jack Johnson over a “ready” K’Andre Miller is crazy, but it’s a trend that I hoped was finally broken the second they shipped Staal out of town. Those attributes are fantastic when combined with ability, it’s part of what separates Lafreniere from his peers, but Jack Johnson is not able to play at this level.
Maybe Jacques’ contract had a JJ shotgun clause? Like a Masterblaster concept
52FA2A55-208F-4FBD-8E7F-252F7D151116.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoAwayStaal
I hope people here are prepared for the return on Strome to be minimal- we are not filling a legitimate hole on this roster through that move (though maybe thru a subsequent trade or Haula signing type thing).
Why wouldn't teams line up around the block to trade for a 27-year-old, top-line talent like Strome?
 
A bad look for fans to complain about their team? Lol. Come on. Thats a new one.

No, you come on. That's not what is happening here, your perception is wrong. The bad look is to over-react, foaming mouth style, to a ONE YEAR ONE MILLION DEAL, that is in reality no real issue to blow up at all. It looks silly to say the least.

no it’s a bad look for our management. We’re being laughed at everywhere for this move.

Everybody laughing at this deal is as delusional as the foaming mouth crowd complaining about it. AFAIK there is nothing even to look at.

you want veteran guys that are going to help the core young guys. This guy will hurt them. We complained about Staal? This guy is that much worse.

Not buying any of this. We have the vets. We'll have to see. Even if it hurts them, which it won't, it'll be for only one year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad