Pretty good shot at winning the cup with his brother in Vegas
Not related
Pretty good shot at winning the cup with his brother in Vegas
I might be biased but I'm happy with either bc I def think we need another right handed shot desperatelyYamamoto. I dont think the Oilers would trade a player they just picked and is in a position of need in the organization.
I honestly think poolparty will be a bust. By bust I mean not matching expectations of a player drafted #4 overall.
I just dont see it, does he make us a contender, when we give him 11 mil per do we have cap space to give raises? grab another forward or center and still with Staal, Smith, Belesky, Girardi's 3.6 mil cap hit for the buyout? I just dont see how you can ice a competitive team against the leagues best who dont have these horrible contracts all while using UFA contracts. Trust me I love Karlsson as much as anybody but he isnt the answer at this point in time imo
I might be biased but I'm happy with either bc I def think we need another right handed shot desperately
Yeah, the timing of it is certainly a little too ideal to be true.Oh I believe there is more to that than him just "thinking outloud".
Yamamoto. I dont think the Oilers would trade a player they just picked and is in a position of need in the organization.
I honestly think poolparty will be a bust. By bust I mean not matching expectations of a player drafted #4 overall.
The Brooks article reads like he is getting cold feet on his earlier firm statements that the Rangers would not in any circumstance be in on EK. Seems like old Larry is hedging his bets after reading this boards.
Why would he do the hypothetical, unless he is hedging his past comments? Especially, given how adamant about NYR not being involved.It read like a hypothetical
I’m not sure I understand what you mean?Yeah, the timing of it is certainly a little too ideal to be true.
I don’t think trading for Karlsson is about “propping up the roster”, I think it’s about Karlsson being a top-5 player in the league and a perennial Norris/Hart candidate. The chances we draft someone of that caliber are slim to none. The opportunity to get a player of Karlsson’s caliber via trade is arguably once in a lifetime. So, I think the Rangers would have interest regardless of whether we’re “rebuilding” or “contending”.
"Once in a lifetime." Until a couple years from now. Lol
For the clicksWhy would he do the hypothetical, unless he is hedging his past comments? Especially, given how adamant about NYR not being involved.
Nah. They are related. They're actually triplets. The third one plays in San Jose.Really?
I'm not doing that deal.Take it and run.
Maybe I got them mixed up with the KlingbergsNah. They are related. They're actually triplets. The third one plays in San Jose.
What happens in a couple of years from now?
I don’t know why real “journalists” would risk their reputation, vacillating back and forth, for clicks.For the clicks
I understand what your saying, but how many can you name in the last ten years that have been on or close to Karlsson’s level.Another disgruntled all star player decides he wants to go the UFA route. To say that this kind of scenario only happens once in a hundred or even ten years is just silly.
Why would he do the hypothetical, unless he is hedging his past comments? Especially, given how adamant about NYR not being involved.
I understand what your saying, but how many can you name in the last ten years that have been on or close to Karlsson’s level.