I'm a big Matthew Tkachuk fan but I think Gaudreau drove the bus on that line.
We need a Debrincat type way more than we need another Tkachuk type.
Not proposing any of the below. Just food for thought.
Lets say the trade was something like: Debrincat, Branstrum, (Picks) <-> M. Tkachuk, Andersson (Picks). AND with Mathew agreeing to same deal as Brady. (lol, yeah not likely...but that's the incentive for us to do the deal and for the brothers to play/win together).
So PD is looking at locked up Mathew and Andersson VS maybe locked up Debrincat at likely a higher price if he gets anywhere near 40 goals again. I can see the value here, but still not saying I'd do it.
Out of curiosity I quickly mapped out both on CP.
(Debate the values of individual resigns all you want, what matters more I think is the amounts per position. ie: if you don't think Formenton will sign for 3mil then we use the amount on another 3rd liner. )
Both of these scenarios leave us over the cap in 2023-24 with still back-up goalie???, depth???, etc. issues.
A) Tkachuk Bro Version
B) Stay the Course Version
Nice problems to have, but PD is going to have to work magic in either scenario.