JD1
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2005
- 16,570
- 10,343
Interesting comments by Dorion in regards to the defense. He mentioned that Chabot, Zub, Hamonic and Holden are locks but that everyone else is battling for a spot. That is "tough decisions needs to be made on our back end, don't worry tough decisions will be made"
He mentioned that is Lassi Thomson, or JBD are one of the top six d men they will be on the team. If Jacob Larsson, Kristian Rubins or Dillon Heatherington are one of the best 6 d men, they are in. That if Sanderson isn't one of the top 6 then he won't be staying around as the 7th d man.
So from the sounds of it Brannstrom and Zaitsev aren't locks to make the team and could conceivably be cut.
They would like to add a top 4 d via trade but they are comfortable with their roster if they don't do that.
With his comments about offering players PTOs it seems like a few d men could be offered them and given a realistic shot to make the team. Based on the list I provided before the d options for PTO are:
PK Subban, Anton Stralman, Danny Dekeyser, Calvin De Haan, Ryan Murray, Scott Harrington, Kris Russell, Nathan Beaulieu, Keith Yandle, Ben Harpur, Zdeno Chara and Michael Stone.
We could possibly narrow that list down to Subban, Stralman, Dekeyser, De Haan, Beaulieu and Chara. Maybe one of two of them could have been offered a PTO by the Sens and it is just up to them if they want to go that route. Then they will be given a realistic chance to take one of the roster spots.
The question is what are those 4 guys locks for? I can for example see Holden as a lock for the 7d position.... Meaning he's on the team regardless of what slot he is in. The other 3 to me are obvious locks for top 6. I read that statement as 2 RD locks to play, 1LD lock and Holden a lock to be the 7th guy
Brannstrom not being a lock might simply mean he's not a lock for 2nd pair LD.