Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals [MOD - Stay on Topic] 5

Wallet Inspector

Registered User
Jan 19, 2013
6,268
5,806
You'd think people would be more excited that we're potentially about to sign a #1 goalie.. especially with all of the goalie uncertainty here since Andy left.

I'm stoked.
There's some apprehension that we may be giving up our 1st in part of a trade package.

But I mostly agree with you. Even with slightly below average goaltending-instead of complete garbage like what we got-there's a good chance we would have made the playoffs last year. I'd love to see us with one of the league's best goalies.
 

BigRig4

Registered User
Feb 22, 2014
3,385
1,524
Korpisalo makes $4 mil & Ullmark makes $5 mil, it makes no sense to have $9 mil tied up in two goalies. They have to find a partner to take a bad contract from us in Korpisalo & we take a bad contract back. Philly have two bad contracts in Johanson C ($4 mil) & Atkinson RW ($5.875 mil) which they want to move although both those contracts are for only 1 more yr whereas Korpisalo has 4 yrs left on his deal. Philly could use an upgrade in net though & there have been rumours they are interested in Joseph & could use some depth on defence given both Johnston & Staal are likely both done. If Ott does not re-sign Kelly & buyout Hamonic they save almost $2 mil.

To Philly: Korpisalo G. Joseph LW/RW & Brannstrom LD ($8.950 mil out)
To Ott: 51st OA, Johansen C & Atkinson RW ($9.875 mil in) - difference $.925K)

To Bost: Chychrun LD & Forsberg G ($7.350 mil out) - (25th???)
To Ott: Ullmark G & Peeke RD ($7.750 mil in) - difference $.4K

UFA: Hellberg G

Tkachuk - Norris - Batherson
Stutzle - Pinto - Giroux
Greig - Johansen - Atkinson - if Ott does not make playoffs trade Johansen & Atkinson at TD
Ostapchuk - Kastelic - MacEwan - $55

Chabot - Zub
Sanderson - Peeke
Kleven - JBD - $25

Ullmark - Hellberg - $6 = $86 mil
I take your point, but the Panthers have spent 14.5m on goalies the last two years and made the finals each time. I think figuring out a solid tandem is step 1, then you worry about getting that salary # down.
 

Senscore

Let's keep it cold
Nov 19, 2012
21,425
17,007
OK but it's a meaningless statement. We only have limited speculation about what's being discussed and he's ready to give Staios kudos for it? LOL.

Well yes it's all predicated on if in fact it is happening.

But given Friedman's indication that Staois is being cautious with his discussions so far, we're starting to get a sense of his dealings, which as I said, is a refreshing change from jump-in-headfirst-with-both-feet Pierre Dorion.
 

StoicSensFan

ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ
Feb 6, 2014
4,380
5,079
Well yes it's all predicated on if in fact it is happening.

But given Friedman's indication that Staois is being cautious with his discussions so far, we're starting to get a sense of his dealings, which as I said, is a refreshing change from jump-in-headfirst-with-both-feet Pierre Dorion.
and the old hawk tuah free 2nd rounder

thanks @Masked for getting the ball rolling on using this meme
 
  • Like
Reactions: Masked

Senscore

Let's keep it cold
Nov 19, 2012
21,425
17,007
My main concern, outside of buying high, is his effectiveness with a higher workload.

He's never played 50 games in a season, and much more than Boston, we'd be relying on him to play as often as possible to be able to get to the playoffs, especially if the alternative is Korpisalo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BonHoonLayneCornell

Gil Gunderson

Registered User
May 2, 2007
31,998
17,975
Ottawa, ON
My main concern, outside of buying high, is his effectiveness with a higher workload.

He's never played 50 games in a season, and much more than Boston, we'd be relying on him to play as often as possible to be able to get to the playoffs, especially if the alternative is Korpisalo.
I have more faith in Forsberg bouncing back than Korpisalo, who I think we should buy out next week. I'm fine with Forsberg for 30 games or so.
 

DJB

Registered User
Jan 6, 2009
16,540
11,392
twitter.com
If Friedmans report of negotiations both a new contract are indeed taking place, that likely means the trade parameters are likely agreed upon

Just to follow up with this…. because if I was a GM I wouldn’t let one of my players negotiate a contract if I didn’t have a deal already in place .

Makes no sense to do so.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad