Loach
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2021
- 3,744
- 2,681
I'd trade Sens of Anarchy if the right circumstances are there, but it would insanity to even think about it now. We need him.
Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals [MOD - Stay on Topic] 5
- Thread starter AchtzehnBaby
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
The right circumstances are his value is high around the league and can bring back a young-ish d man. And we can sign a veteran center who can play wing who can fill in third line C.
Of course, I would not trade him this instant for nothing.
Loach
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2021
- 3,744
- 2,681
There’s no blender. I just don’t particularly love chabot. I think Greig might be a little overvalued. And if he really explodes and wants to play center there’s no space for him.
One of the centers need to go. It’s a good problem to have. But a problem you need to deal with ultimately
Loach
Registered User
- Jun 9, 2021
- 3,744
- 2,681
If he explodes, we can cross that bridge when we get to it. Same as any player. Let's just ride along here instead of looking for problems to fix that aren't there.
"I just don’t particularly love chabot. I think Greig might be a little overvalued. And if he really explodes and wants to play center there’s no space for him."
I read this very differently than you, apparently. Greig has not "exploded". Greig has not stated that he must play center. Seems very much like a hypothetical situation at the moment.
Or he doesn’t explode and his value might be at its highest this offseason. Just an idea.
Remember I have zero power to actually make these moves. People disagree they don’t want to see Greig traded. Thats fine
Not tonight. Or tomorrow tonight. Something I would wxplore in the offseason only AFTER seeing how Greig is valued around the league.
If he can only bring back a second round pick yeah I’m not gonna trade him and chabot.
Everything on a message board is hypothetical basically.
And if he doesn’t explode but his value is high around the league… he can be moved for defensive help.
Big Muddy
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2019
- 9,276
- 4,536
Hypothetical is a noteworthy word here. There’s only 6 teams that have enough cap space for Chabot currently. Only four teams have enough “projected” cap space to accommodate a Chabot trade at some point this year. Then the veteran center is going to cost more than Grieg.
Not sure what this poster had in mind as far as when this would occur though. Maybe the thinking this was that this was an offseason move?
But generally, regardless of the timeframe, there’s usually a limit to how many teams have $8 m of cap space, and a decent vet center is probably going to get paid more than Grieg.
Edit - I see a more recent post that adds detail now on the timeline. However, post #15,915 indicated the opposite and that this was being contemplated as a current or near future move.
Last edited:
Big Muddy
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2019
- 9,276
- 4,536
You’re contradicting yourself & not being very clear on the timing of these proposed moves.
Let’s say Greig does have a great season, you are saying move him in a package for a young top 4 D. Problem is we already have our top 4 D identified next year.
Big Muddy
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2019
- 9,276
- 4,536
I’d also wonder if Grieg would fetch a return of a young top 4 D. He might, but it's logical to look at the basic premise to see how feasible it is. Generally speaking, teams like to hang on to good young top 4 D and tend to be loathe to move them. Of course, “package” could mean just about anything, and like most things, the devil is in the details.
Last edited:
I think it’s time to move on from chabot tho.
Of course. I don’t know. But I am thinking that right now his value is high because of his reputation. And a team with a set top 4 ish might be willing to move a younger guy OR move an established guy to make room for a young guy in exchange for what they receive to be a future two way top 6 center (may or may not be correct)
And by “right now” I don’t mean trade him like this instant.
He also said alledgedly via Gord that he’s more comfortable at center.
Idea is to get a right sided zub for yakemchuk.
And Jensen down with kleven next year. Or in two years. Whatever the case may be
Big Muddy
Registered User
- Dec 15, 2019
- 9,276
- 4,536
Yakemchuk is a RD.
Re: right-sided Zub
Zub is a RD.
I thought you were trying to replace Chabot, a LD?
The bolded part in your 2nd paragraph (***) is correct though.
Last edited:
lunadio
Registered User
- Feb 8, 2006
- 312
- 33
Another high scoring game Ala barn burner and another loss can't finish it out there's a big problem and it ain't all goalie related you can't expect a goalie to be your savior every night you got to have a team in front of him who can defend
Karlsson ain’t ever gonna change.
Tkatchuk and stutzle vibes.
I thought chabot has been really good outside of the first few games
He had some really good rushes yesterday and seemed to be actually trying to make plays while others were asleep
He had some really good rushes yesterday and seemed to be actually trying to make plays while others were asleep
Agreed. Him and Jensen haven’t even played together very long but you can see they’re getting more and more comfortable with each other. Happy for Chabot, he finally got a stable partner and it shows. Let’s see if he can stay consistent now.
Agent Zuuuub
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2015
- 15,834
- 13,668
Anaheim fan proposed
Mctavish+Top 3 protected 2025 1st
For Brady.
We gotta do that right?
Mctavish+Top 3 protected 2025 1st
For Brady.
We gotta do that right?
If we trade Grieg or Pinto for anyone, I just hope the player returning can stay healthy at this point
