Agent Zuuuub
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2015
- 15,206
- 12,689
Especially since the 5th is what they got for cap dump Beauvilier. They basically just paid a 3rd.Wow that's a good trade for Vancouver.
The more unbelievable part was Beauvillier being able to be dumped so easily. Like, is that the best Chicago could get being one of the very few teams with cap space? And throw in a pick on top of it?This shouldn't be a huge surprise. I know people who say Kubalik or Brannstrom would be difficult to trade for assets let alone trade at all have taken some flack in this thread. The reality is teams just don't have cap, and there is a huge opportunity cost to giving up cap. Most of the few teams who do have cap, don't have budget space to use it.
It's pretty clear that the Perry and Hall losses enabled Chicago to go out and get Beauvillier. That domino enabled Vancouver to have cap to get Zadorov.
Things probably loosen up at the TDL. We saw last year, prices were wild.
The more unbelievable part was Beauvillier being able to be dumped so easily. Like, is that the best Chicago could get being one of the very few teams with cap space? And throw in a pick on top of it?
Ya I guess they might see something there. He's been a disappointment this year and Tocchet singled him out at some points, but fair enough. He has a better track record than I thought.Beauvillier isn't really a cap dump. Had 40P last year and his contract expires this season.
Underwhelming numbers to start the season but he's had little offensive opportunity. Odd man out in a stacked offense.
Should put to rest any notion that we'd have to give up assets to dump Kubalik.
doesnt it pro-rate though? So like we sign him for a mil and he only gets $500K cause he missed half the season?Why do we need to dump Kubalik anyways? We can likely sign Pinto for about a million when he can play again.
doesnt it pro-rate though? So like we sign him for a mil and he only gets $500K cause he missed half the season?
Or we sign him for $1M for half a season and it pro-rates to a $2M cap hit?
I think the key here is he isn't very good and makes nearly 4M this year.wow zadorov for a 3rd and 5th.
we need that type of player.
Yeah i get that part. He made his bed here.Sucks for him.
Yeah i get that part. He made his bed here.
But do the rules allow a player to sign for half a year at $500k like that? I assume they can, but is it just a $1M contract based on the full-season that gets prorated down to below league minimum in terms of actual cash paid?
Naw. Disagree. His vision for sick playmaking, and his silky hands and wicked shot... = keeper. He just needs a REAL coachBatherson never struck me as that promising a prospect. I thought I had been wrong when he looked like a legit star in the making before getting hurt.
Now I am back to thinking I was right. He isn't that good.
Well, he's a UFA, so that might be why we weren't interested when combined with the cap implicationsSo Canucks just traded some magic beans (3rd, 5th) for RD Zadorov from Flames. Could we not have done better? (despite cap jail...)
i think Hamonic was paid 3m the year we got him for a 3rd (because we didn't have a 4th).I think the key here is he isn't very good and makes nearly 4M this year.
We don't really need another LHD, if he was a RHD, maybe.Zadorov is great. Well worth the price and exactly what that team needs.
Sorry I meant the Canucks. He's a good fit there I think.We don't really need another LHD, if he was a RHD, maybe.