Burrowsaurus
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2013
- 44,222
- 17,293
No one thinks they’re winners. But like. Karlsson isn’t one either?and?
he is still a great player. better than Chabot or Chychrun easily, better than many of our forwards. and more than that he would elevate the play of the forwards.
you'd think that people would gain greater appreciation of what Karlsson was able to do with the Senators especially after seeing the trouble Brady, Chabot and Friends are having trouble accomplishing together after signing big ass contracts. but somehow it is the opposite.
like Brady and Chabot are seen as winners to be protected from the loser Karlsson.
makes no sense.
This team needs like 2 strong defensive d men and a good two way forward. Karlsson is none of these and he’s one person and doesn’t improve us at all unless our goalies start not being total garbage.Lmao bro, of all people you could have used as an example that could've clouded my judgment you picked dumb and dumber?
Do I think Chabot is what this team needs to compete and be a legitimate cup contender? Absolutely not. Chychrun? Absolutely not. Would Karlsson help more than those 2? The likelihood is probably yes but given what this team actually needs I don't think he'd be a good target.
A bigger, stay at home defenceman who can clear the front of the net is what is lacking from this team's defence. There is not a single player on defence that can do that and Karlsson wouldn't either so what balance would he bring other than redundancy at a higher age?
Oh yeah. That’s ACTUALLY what we need. A goalie will stop easy shots to take their save % above .900