I think you're overlooking the assets we'd be adding through those trades. So when those contracts are expiring in three years, those trade assets would be starting to contribute. And those guys you're worried about resigning would be expendable (i.e, tradable for even more assets).
Like what would the return look like for unloading all of norris + giroux + chych + tank + kubalik + brann look like, if we only took back picks, prospects and expiring cap dumps? Im assuming that return is equivalent to like 4 2024 firsts and a couple seconds at minimum.
we'd still have a top six core of brady, bath, stu, pinto, greig, and joseph. Plus a boatload of cash to pay top dollar for some short term ufa talent to build around that.
Then add six 2024 first rounders who would start contributing in 1-3 years.
In three years we'd be so overloaded with young talent that the pieces you're worried about resigning would be superficial at that point.
It's like layering two cascading rebuilds on top of each other.
You could literally build a 2027 roster that looks like:
Brady-stu-bath
Greig-pinto-joseph
2024 first-2024 first-2024 first
4th line
Sanderson- 2024 1st
Chabot - 2024 1st
2025 1st - 2024 2nd
Sorry it took a bit of time to get back to you on this
I was not against the trades you mentioned (Tarasenko, Norris, Brannstrom, Kubalik, Giroux and Chychrun)
I was against trading Giroux though because we desperately need his experience, leadership, work ethic, talent and 2-way ability. Ex NHLers like Roussel, Lapierre, Leclaire, Latendresse, Picard, Fichaud, Lalime, etc all go in the same sense, Sens NEED MORE veterans like Giroux, not less.
Regarding Norris, I think we need to be more patient. His defensive metrics are slowly getting back to the top of the league. He only has 4 pts in the 7 games since coming back but 2 at ES and 1 SH. He'll need to start scoring on the PP to get his value up but keep in mind he got back from a long term injury in a discombobulated mess and the PP is still ineffective right now.
I think trading Chychrun, Tarasenko, Brannstrom and Kubalik is already a good start but IMO we should not target FUTURES for 2 reasons
- We need to start being more competitive YESTERDAY, there's no more time to waste, Tkachuk will be 25 y/o next season.
- Getting a lot of assets (while creating massive holes in the roster) would just start to offset the incredible amount of assets wasted by Dorion PUTRID asset management. So basically it would be taking many steps back just to get back to where we should be in terms of organizational wealth. Very frustrating. Example, the 1st gotten for Tarasenko or in a Norris trade would just offset the 1st we will have to lose because of the Dadonov fiasco.
I understand all of what you're saying but keep in mind than banking on 1st round picks to develop the way you hope or signing the best UFA in a market like Ottawa (known as one of the less attractive for NHLers) is more GAMBLING, which was Dorion's specialty.