Calculations? Are you messing with me?Shots Against, High Danger Chances against, Goals Against....it really doesnt matter how you try to calculate D, the Leafs are in the top ten for fewest against in the league since Keefe was hired which was a huge turnaround from the Babcock day where they were a mainstay in the bottom ten.
Ill even throw up the top 10 teams for fewest Goals Against since Keefe was hired:
1. Bruins
2. Avs
3. Knights
4. Islanders
5. Lightning
6. Hurricanes
7. Stars
8. Jets
9. Blues
10. Leafs
Some of these teams are more goaltending than defense and some vice versa. The Leafs would fall in the second category as the only weak spot on the team really is team save% (19th in the league since Keefe was hired). The reason the Leafs are into the top ten for goals against and yet 19th in save% is due to the fact their good defensive play under Keefe is doing enough to keep goals down despite the erratic play of the goaltending during his tenure (103 games).
Here are how the goalies that have spent any meaningful time with the Leafs have done under him:
Andersen:
GP:59
save %: .903
GAA: 2.93
Campbell:
GP:33
save %: .919
GAA: 2.25
Hutchinson:
GP:19
save %: .901
GAA: 2.95
I know Andersen was hobbled by injuries but the fact he was greatly outclassed by Campbell and virtually on par with Hutch is certainly going to get management's attention right? What would you have done looking at these very not advanced numbers?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/495f1/495f185fc1f2d2bd459ec9ded3ca2eb67b513d95" alt="laugh :laugh: :laugh:"
I asked you before how many times your stats have to crash and burn before you realize they’re worthless? Pro tip: Public sites are snake oil and you’re buying.