F A N
Registered User
- Aug 12, 2005
- 19,538
- 6,415
The statement of getting rid of OEL was far more important than actually getting rid of the player and his contributions.
Meh. These supposed "statements" are mostly fan fiction. It's not like the Canucks have been unwilling to spend money or trade futures in an effort to win. Players care about the players in the room. OEL was coming off a bad season but I doubt most of the players looked at OEL and thought "if only management bought him out."
And this wasn't some brilliant stroke by management either. They were reportedly looking to move Garland or Boeser to free up cap space. Could OEL and Myers formed a good 2nd pairing last season? I think so.
I've always maintained that buying out OEL this summer as opposed to last is better. By buying out last summer the team got $7M+ in cap space last year. This year the gain was a little less than $5M. In year 3 and year 4 the cap savings is slightly less than $2.5M. While OEL is aging, it's questionable as to whether we'll be able to upgrade over OEL in years 3 and 4 with that ~$2.5M. Right now in year 2 OEL would be the team's 2nd best LD.