Former Canucks Thread 2023-24 Off-Season Edition

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,538
6,415
The statement of getting rid of OEL was far more important than actually getting rid of the player and his contributions.

Meh. These supposed "statements" are mostly fan fiction. It's not like the Canucks have been unwilling to spend money or trade futures in an effort to win. Players care about the players in the room. OEL was coming off a bad season but I doubt most of the players looked at OEL and thought "if only management bought him out."

And this wasn't some brilliant stroke by management either. They were reportedly looking to move Garland or Boeser to free up cap space. Could OEL and Myers formed a good 2nd pairing last season? I think so.

I've always maintained that buying out OEL this summer as opposed to last is better. By buying out last summer the team got $7M+ in cap space last year. This year the gain was a little less than $5M. In year 3 and year 4 the cap savings is slightly less than $2.5M. While OEL is aging, it's questionable as to whether we'll be able to upgrade over OEL in years 3 and 4 with that ~$2.5M. Right now in year 2 OEL would be the team's 2nd best LD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: David71

HairyKneel

Registered User
Jun 5, 2023
1,550
1,437
Meh. These supposed "statements" are mostly fan fiction. It's not like the Canucks have been unwilling to spend money or trade futures in an effort to win. Players care about the players in the room. OEL was coming off a bad season but I doubt most of the players looked at OEL and thought "if only management bought him out."

And this wasn't some brilliant stroke by management either. They were reportedly looking to move Garland or Boeser to free up cap space. Could OEL and Myers formed a good 2nd pairing last season? I think so.

I've always maintained that buying out OEL this summer as opposed to last is better. By buying out last summer the team got $7M+ in cap space last year. This year the gain was a little less than $5M. In year 3 and year 4 the cap savings is slightly less than $2.5M. While OEL is aging, it's questionable as to whether we'll be able to upgrade over OEL in years 3 and 4 with that ~$2.5M. Right now in year 2 OEL would be the team's 2nd best LD.
We all know the logistics of the buyout. It was about changing the culture here. The culture stunk for the better part of a decade. He was Loui Ericsson part 2. And sorry he is definitely not a better player than Carson Soucy right now and he's also 250 K more expensive and wasn't coming back for Round 3 with Tocchet. Is any of this sinking in?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rypper

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,781
16,287
it looks like Podkolzin's stay in Edmonton has basically mirrored what happened in Vancouver.

Coaches like his hustle and willingness to take the body in the offensive zone. But on the points side, he's a big bagel after six games. Even as a third-fourth liner, you have to score at least once a month to stay in the lineup.

Not sure what happened to him. He looked like in his rookie season in Vancouver that he'd be at least a 10-15 goal scorer. But his offense has completely died on the vine. I wonder how long it'll take for him to end up back on waivers?
 

F A N

Registered User
Aug 12, 2005
19,538
6,415
We all know the logistics of the buyout. It was about changing the culture here. The culture stunk for the better part of a decade. He was Loui Ericsson part 2. And sorry he is definitely not a better player than Carson Soucy right now and he's also 250 K more expensive and wasn't coming back for Round 3 with Tocchet. Is any of this sinking in?

I don't think trading OEL changes the culture as much as say trading Horvat. OEL was only here for two years and clearly he doesn't prevent a team from winning a Cup. I think OEL is overall a better player than Soucy but we can disagree.

I'm not sure what you mean by OEL not coming back for Round 3 with Tocchet. If we didn't buy him out he would be under contract. Are you saying he would hold out waiting for a trade? Of course if there is some genuine animosity between the two where it impacts the locker room then ya otherwise I maintain that it was a short-term move.
 

vadim sharifijanov

Registered User
Oct 10, 2007
29,803
18,021
IMG_7339.jpeg


rip

one of these two (i think probably the one on the right but i forget) was my first ever hockey card. in second or third grade all of a sudden a bunch of the other boys had hockey cards and i had never even heard of them before. but a nice kid named andrew offered me one. i asked for a canuck and this old moe lemay is what he gave me.
 

MS

1%er
Mar 18, 2002
56,067
92,983
Vancouver, BC
View attachment 920353

rip

one of these two (i think probably the one on the right but i forget) was my first ever hockey card. in second or third grade all of a sudden a bunch of the other boys had hockey cards and i had never even heard of them before. but a nice kid named andrew offered me one. i asked for a canuck and this old moe lemay is what he gave me.

I can’t believe someone made a Moe Lemay hockey card post and it wasn’t about the Otto/Lemay mix-up which was probably the most famous hockey card ‘thing’ when I was a kid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Canucklehead

vadim sharifijanov

Registered User
Oct 10, 2007
29,803
18,021
I can’t believe someone made a Moe Lemay hockey card post and it wasn’t about the Otto/Lemay mix-up which was probably the most famous hockey card ‘thing’ when I was a kid.

before my time, but i did have a misprinted pro set joe nieuwendyk that they fixed very quickly so it was supposed to be fairly rare

beckett had it listed at $5

and check it out, it’s held its value

IMG_7340.jpeg
 

Russian_fanatic

Registered User
Jan 19, 2004
7,895
2,193
it looks like Podkolzin's stay in Edmonton has basically mirrored what happened in Vancouver.

Coaches like his hustle and willingness to take the body in the offensive zone. But on the points side, he's a big bagel after six games. Even as a third-fourth liner, you have to score at least once a month to stay in the lineup.

Not sure what happened to him. He looked like in his rookie season in Vancouver that he'd be at least a 10-15 goal scorer. But his offense has completely died on the vine. I wonder how long it'll take for him to end up back on waivers?

Kid has never produced at ANY level of professional hockey consistently and I'm talking VHL, MHL, KHL, AHL, WJC, and NHL.

I Honestly threw out Dustin Brown/Brendan Morrow comparisons during his rookie season, but you then start to realize how much of a mirage his rookie year was. Stone hands, muffin shot, and a horrible passer. His saving grace is he's strong, and he can throw hits. It's mind boggling what the team saw in him
 

RobertKron

Registered User
Sep 1, 2007
16,212
9,840
Has Podkolzin ever been on waivers before to go "back?" I thought he hadn't been eligible until this year.
 

I Hart Conor Garland

SMD
Sponsor
May 3, 2021
8,925
8,950
View attachment 920353

rip

one of these two (i think probably the one on the right but i forget) was my first ever hockey card. in second or third grade all of a sudden a bunch of the other boys had hockey cards and i had never even heard of them before. but a nice kid named andrew offered me one. i asked for a canuck and this old moe lemay is what he gave me.
Cheers Andrew.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vadim sharifijanov

VanJack

Registered User
Jul 11, 2014
22,781
16,287
Has Podkolzin ever been on waivers before to go "back?" I thought he hadn't been eligible until this year.
His first year of waiver eligibility was this season.......and one of the biggest reasons the Canucks dealt him. They just weren't confident that he would ever clear to be sent to Abbotsford.
 

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
38,976
7,918
Montreal, Quebec
it looks like Podkolzin's stay in Edmonton has basically mirrored what happened in Vancouver.

Coaches like his hustle and willingness to take the body in the offensive zone. But on the points side, he's a big bagel after six games. Even as a third-fourth liner, you have to score at least once a month to stay in the lineup.

Not sure what happened to him. He looked like in his rookie season in Vancouver that he'd be at least a 10-15 goal scorer. But his offense has completely died on the vine. I wonder how long it'll take for him to end up back on waivers?

Unfortunately, Podkolzin is that type of player who needs to put everything in one thing to be moderately decent. When he was actually a semi-scoring threat, he basically didn't play a lick of defense and got beat on the regular. Now that he's tried adjusting his game, he doesn't have the flexibility to get himself in position to be that aforementioned threat.

Basically, he can't handle how fast and adaptable the NHL level is. If you're going to be one dimensional, you better be very good at that one thing.


A lot more Bruins fans tonight are becoming disgruntled with that signing

Doesn't surprise me he's a rockhead. I still love what Z brought us but the playoffs definitely overrated him a bit.
 

thecupismine

Registered User
Apr 1, 2007
2,677
2,027
Still blows my mind that in 2014 we drafted a high end top six winger, a number one defensemen, and a number one goalie, but traded away two of them like they had negative value (we lost picks AND got negative players back). They also started rounding right into form as our two best players were on ELCs (Petey and Hughes) - the window for contention really should've opened up 5 years ago with any sort of competent management.

Somehow, we kept the one guy from the draft with actual negative value on the roster way past his expiry date (dude can barely hang around in the DEL these days) :laugh:
 
  • Like
Reactions: timw33

calnuck

Registered User
Nov 26, 2010
4,426
4,239
CA
Man I’m so glad we were able to rid ourselves of Mikheyev. Guy is still a dud on a rebuilding blackhawks team when guys like Dickinson manage to produce at a higher rate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regal

archangel2

Registered User
May 19, 2019
2,785
1,737
Still blows my mind that in 2014 we drafted a high end top six winger, a number one defensemen, and a number one goalie, but traded away two of them like they had negative value (we lost picks AND got negative players back). They also started rounding right into form as our two best players were on ELCs (Petey and Hughes) - the window for contention really should've opened up 5 years ago with any sort of competent management.

Somehow, we kept the one guy from the draft with actual negative value on the roster way past his expiry date (dude can barely hang around in the DEL these days) :laugh:

You are rewriting history and ignoring actual facts. It wasn't till 3 season ago that McCann actual put his shit together and the number 1 D is Gustov? He is not a number 1 D.. he is good but you ignore it took 7 years from his draft year to actual show he was any good. Hawks and Carolina let him go as well. How many teams dud McCann play on before he put solid numbers together?
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,569
16,485
Vancouver
You are rewriting history and ignoring actual facts. It wasn't till 3 season ago that McCann actual put his shit together and the number 1 D is Gustov? He is not a number 1 D.. he is good but you ignore it took 7 years from his draft year to actual show he was any good. Hawks and Carolina let him go as well. How many teams dud McCann play on before he put solid numbers together?

Agreed with the idea that these guys likely needed to move around first and took their time, but Forsling is most definitely a number 1 (just played 23-25 min a game as the best dman on a back to back Finals team and last years cup winner).
 

archangel2

Registered User
May 19, 2019
2,785
1,737
Agreed with the idea that these guys likely needed to move around first and took their time, but Forsling is most definitely a number 1 (just played 23-25 min a game as the best dman on a back to back Finals team and last years cup winner).


Eklbad is the number 1 in Florida and it aint close
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,569
16,485
Vancouver
Eklbad is the number 1 in Florida and it aint close

Ekblad is pretty mediocre now with all the injuries. Florida fans aren’t even sure if they want him back at a discount. Forsling is much better and the clear best defenseman on the team

 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad