Funny how everyone ragged Bura non-stop and now we see the lineup without him and his 50-60 pts and we wish we had anything close to him on the 2nd line.Newhook needs to be tried on the wing with one of Mackinnon/Rantanen to see if that works. Otherwise I don’t really know what to do with him right now. I know they’re adamant on him being the answer to the 2C eventually but there has to come a point where they stop forcing that if it isn’t working.
He’s been able to make quick plays in the offensive zone when they already have the puck and are circling the ozone with speed but that’s about all he’s been able to do. I’d honestly try him on the wing with Mackinnon to see if they can generate some chemistry doing exactly that. He hasn’t earned a promotion by any means but he’s just not going to contribute anything if he doesn’t have someone to make plays with in the ozone because he is reliant on others.
This lineup misses Burakovsky so much.
They will. We need to be patient this season. Our roster won't come together until the deadline.Avs did nothing to replace Kadri and Bura. Nothing. This start is to be expected. The Avs look like meat now to the opp. The Avs have been outplayed in every game minus the Chicago game.
Hey that’s not true. They replaced him with a significantly worse player in Erod.Avs did nothing to replace Kadri and Bura. Nothing. This start is to be expected. The Avs look like meat now to the opp. The Avs have been outplayed in every game minus the Chicago game.
Yup... all of this.Newhook needs to be tried on the wing with one of Mackinnon/Rantanen to see if that works. Otherwise I don’t really know what to do with him right now. I know they’re adamant on him being the answer to the 2C eventually but there has to come a point where they stop forcing that if it isn’t working.
He’s been able to make quick plays in the offensive zone when they already have the puck and are circling the ozone with speed but that’s about all he’s been able to do. I’d honestly try him on the wing with Mackinnon to see if they can generate some chemistry doing exactly that. He hasn’t earned a promotion by any means but he’s just not going to contribute anything if he doesn’t have someone to make plays with in the ozone because he is reliant on others.
This lineup misses Burakovsky so much.
I'm also in favor of trading Girard, but what me and you say, is useless because the Avs management don't want to trade himYeah it's called move Girard. 5M instantly appears. Throw in Newhook and it's basically 6M, and if you can get some retention it's no problem.
I'd be dangling a package of G, Newhook, 1st around the league. Should be plenty to get a legit 2C and some retention.
It's win now mode, can't wait and hope the Newhook turns into something, G has become redundant and a 1st is a 1st.
I mean this is nothing new to the Avs. We had this dude on the team for a short while.Not only is ERod shitty hes also insanely ugly.
I have no idea who this is.I mean this is nothing new to the Avs. We had this dude on the team for a short while.
They might not have a choice, can't pay 5M to guy playing 15ish mins a night (played more last night when Toews missed 2/3rds of the 3rd period) on the 3rd pair. Especially can't do that when the forwards are this shitty. Can't survive with 4 competent forwards, It simply isn't going to work.I'm also in favor of trading Girard, but what me and you say, is useless because the Avs management don't want to trade him
Definitely. I feel like he was a little under appreciated by Avs fans but he was a great player to have on the team and he’s also doing pretty well now with SeattleNewhook needs to be tried on the wing with one of Mackinnon/Rantanen to see if that works. Otherwise I don’t really know what to do with him right now. I know they’re adamant on him being the answer to the 2C eventually but there has to come a point where they stop forcing that if it isn’t working.
He’s been able to make quick plays in the offensive zone when they already have the puck and are circling the ozone with speed but that’s about all he’s been able to do. I’d honestly try him on the wing with Mackinnon to see if they can generate some chemistry doing exactly that. He hasn’t earned a promotion by any means but he’s just not going to contribute anything if he doesn’t have someone to make plays with in the ozone because he is reliant on others.
This lineup misses Burakovsky so much.
The Great One - Tyler Arnason.I have no idea who this is.
I said the same thing last year about losing Donskoi and Saad. We had a bad start last year too.Funny how everyone ragged Bura non-stop and now we see the lineup without him and his 50-60 pts and we wish we had anything close to him on the 2nd line.
Between Bura, Kadri and Landy we are missing 207 points from last year. And we are asking Newhook to replace Kadri, Rodrigues to replace Bura and we didn't get anyone to replace Landy's missing production so I guess 4th line scrub to replace him.
We'll be lucky to get 100 pts out Newhook, Rodrigues and random 4th liner and 30 games of Landy.
We have a large problem, I know it's early but it very evident and needs to be addressed quickly can't wait until January or later.
Again, I agree. Let's tell Sakic and MacFarland that. I think we should just trust those dudes because they just won the cupThey might not have a choice, can't pay 5M to guy playing 15ish mins a night (played more last night when Toews missed 2/3rds of the 3rd period) on the 3rd pair. Especially can't do that when the forwards are this shitty. Can't survive with 4 competent forwards, It simply isn't going to work.
Got to get a legit 2C that can bump players into more appropriate roles.
We were always going to. Lots of fans just kept seeing his mistakes (and quite frankly, an exaggerated narrative of him being soft and useless if he wasn't scoring) but kept taking for granted that Bura was actually a really good 2nd liner who consistently produced 50+ pts every year.So now we're missing Burakovsky, eh?
Interesting.
I mean considering we replaced him Erod so obviously.So now we're missing Burakovsky, eh?
Interesting.
The man could score....against Edmonton. I didnt care for the ugly.I mean this is nothing new to the Avs. We had this dude on the team for a short while.
Miss him because the Avs tried to replace him with Quasimodo Rodriguez who doesnt even look better than Kiefer Sherwood.So now we're missing Burakovsky, eh?
Interesting.
Funny how everyone ragged Bura non-stop and now we see the lineup without him and his 50-60 pts and we wish we had anything close to him on the 2nd line.
Between Bura, Kadri and Landy we are missing 207 points from last year. And we are asking Newhook to replace Kadri, Rodrigues to replace Bura and we didn't get anyone to replace Landy's missing production so I guess 4th line scrub to replace him.
We'll be lucky to get 100 pts out Newhook, Rodrigues and random 4th liner and 30 games of Landy.
We have a large problem, I know it's early but it very evident and needs to be addressed quickly can't wait until January or later.
Ya this is key. I hope they put newhook with nuke and Kaut and see how that goes.Encouraging that the Avs turned it around halfway through that game. I thought the Nuke-Compher-Kaut line looked particularly good the second half of the game. I hope they give that line a few more games to see how it goes.
They need to get Newhook and Rodrigues away from each other. Their games aren't meshing at all.
Another night where I cant fault Georgiev. The defense has been subpar. Manson was horrible last night. Avs getting hemmed in for long stretches is not something im used to nor want to get used to.With Landy out, the Avs are missing an entire scoring line's worth of forwards from last year. Very good ones too. That's gonna hurt no matter what.
It's funny but 3-on-3 runs completely counter to Nathan MacKinnon's game. You'd think it wouldn't but it does. His game is predicated on finding/creating space that isn't there, weaving through gaps and bulldozing his way through defenders. You can see he tries that in OT and it usually leads to disaster--there's all this wide open space and he tries jamming himself in between three guys to make a play of some sort. Meanwhile, guys like Nuke (and before him, EJ) say "Holy shit, lookit all this open space" and they use it to their advantage.
Anyway, I was largely impressed with last night's effort after that atrocious 1st period. It's a good sign when the team doesn't lay down after a bad start, I think they'll work out the kinks eventually. And so far, I'm mostly good with Georgiev--he's made a whole lot of big stops when he needs too, and his rebound control isn't great, but it isn't nearly as scary as Kuemper's was.
If he can produce at NAK level you take it and run.Kaut turning into a useful foreword would be a big help. Hopefully he can build from here rather than regress to what we saw last year