GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,818
- 44,544
(EDIT)
Last edited by a moderator:
Talking to the Flyers in December and Sweden also could've been them saying "Cutter doesn't want to speak to you" or "nothing has changed. Bye." That's not technically radio silence but it's also not opening any negotiations nor telling the Flyers why Cutter doesn't want to play for them.Don't you think that there's a chance that Briere saying that they never gave a reason is just GM speak?
Gauthier's representatives have also said that they talked to the Flyers at least in December in Colorado and in Sweden. You combine that with the fact that they've talked about the trade scenarios for months now. It wasn't radio silence.
I’m not so sure but at this point I hope you’re right! Would be nice if Drysdale is a bonafide top pairing player. Not sure he’s a #1. Time will tell.No, we’re thrilled. Gauthier was overrated as hell.
He’s the Jalen Hurts of the NHL.
Briere said that they refused to talk to them though. That's a major talking point going on here and a major reason that Gauthier is being labeled as "immature or classless" and yet there's evidence to the contrary.Talking to the Flyers in December and Sweden also could've been them saying "Cutter doesn't want to speak to you" or "nothing has changed. Bye." That's not technically radio silence but it's also not opening any negotiations nor telling the Flyers why Cutter doesn't want to play for them.
Both parties are going to try making themselves look as good as possible in the situation and none of us on this message board know for sure what the exact truth is. Everything is conjecture and it's silly for anyone to pin the blame 100% on Briere/the Flyers or Cutter.
I don’t see many people saying that he doesn’t have the right to pursue what he believes is in his self-interest. He’s absolutely entitled to do that, for whatever reason he chooses.
Maybe he really did look at the organization and say “I want no part of that steaming pile of shit”. But how much better is the Ducks org? Fresh off a last-in-the-NHL season, they haven’t made the playoffs since 2017-18. I’m sure they’ll be pretty good in a few years, but it’s hard to look at this and say “Gauthier only wanted to go to an organization that he had confidence in” or “Gauthier wanted to go to an organization that would maximize his value”. The reasons just seem much more arbitrary than that.
Which, again, is totally fine! I’m not demanding Gauthier have a good reason. It’s just that spinning this into a grievance with the Flyers reaping the rewards of some unique organizational dysfunction seems like contorting the circumstances to fit your personal despair as a Flyers fan.
In sum:
1. Gauthier adamantly didn’t want to be a Flyer.
2. That’s OK.
3. That’s also a bit strange. Perhaps justifiable, but definitely strange.
The odd breakdown communication is also an ancillary factor, with perhaps blame lying with both parties. But IMO, predominantly with the side forcing the issue.
Talking to the Flyers in December and Sweden also could've been them saying "Cutter doesn't want to speak to you" or "nothing has changed. Bye." That's not technically radio silence but it's also not opening any negotiations nor telling the Flyers why Cutter doesn't want to play for them.
Both parties are going to try making themselves look as good as possible in the situation and none of us on this message board know for sure what the exact truth is. Everything is conjecture and it's silly for anyone to pin the blame 100% on Briere/the Flyers or Cutter.
Don't forget Camillo!Gauthier was loyal to Chuck. Fired in a disgraceful manner lol
ok so we agree that his skull is completely empty5) Whilst reading HF Flyers, Cutter learned of the existences of @Lord Defect and @Striiker. Decided he could not be part of an organization in any way affiliated with such defectiveness, and is a firm believer that hot dogs are not sandwiches.
Those people are wrong. Purely, as a factual matter, they’re wrong. He has the right to rebuff the Flyers, as is proven by his using that right. But it’s also OK to find his thought process baffling, arbitrary, and entitled.So there's definitely a lot of people saying he was drafted, he owes the Flyers, etc.
Re: the ducks -- he has no control over that. He has no trade protection, so the Flyers can dump him anywhere they want. Now, I would imagine the ducks had a conversation with him beforehand to make sure they were on the same page. Otherwise, they're just dumb. On ice the ducks are maybe worse, but they actually play kids, and put them in positions to succeed. Again, I dont know his motivations, but if he was worried about opportunity, it would be fair to look at the ducks and see the time they've given their top prospects versus the Flyers who are still yo-yoing a prospect drafted 7 years ago.
I dont know who is to blame. I imagine both sides could've handled this better. We sont know what happens and it's all heresay from twitter reporters, so it's grain of salt. But what isn't heresay is a Flyers affiliate making wild claims and stirring shit up, sending their top executive to that podcast and endorsing it, etc, which is whipping fans into a frenzy for no reason.
Those people are wrong. Purely, as a factual matter, they’re wrong. He has the right to rebuff the Flyers, as is proven by his using that right. But it’s also OK to find his thought process baffling, arbitrary, and entitled.
Regarding the Ducks, that just strikes me as what I meant by contorting the circumstances to fit our grievances as Flyers fans. The Flyers are playing plenty of kids. Some frustrating lineup decisions? Sure, but the kids are being given opportunities. It’s just that there are established players like Couturier and Konecny to contend with in the Flyers lineup. But Gauthier has now explicitly said that it had nothing to do with Tortorella, so it strikes me as unlikely that “they play their kids” was the reason.
Again, blaming the Flyers for losing him because they’re some unique dumpster fire is the part that seems fanciful and objectionable. Maybe that really is what he thought, but they weren’t exactly less of a dumpster fire when he was drafted and indicating that he was OK with being a Flyer.
They met with them in Colorado in December when the Flyers were in town. They played the Avs on 12/9. They then supposedly met at the WJC in Sweden so it seems a bit redundant to meet in both places if a trade was already worked out but it's possible. For information sake, the WJC started on 12/26 and pre-tournament games happened around a week before that or so.There's a good chance that the "contact in December" was the flyers informing him he was getting traded to Anaheim no?
Wouldn't that have been right around the WJC?
If you actually believe that he didn’t give the Flyers any type of explanation as to why he was upset with them and then less than a month later, without any clue of what the problem(s) were / if they were fixable, the Flyers tried to trade him at the 2023 draft for David Reinbacher, then I can see why you don’t think Chuck Fletcher made any mistakes as GM.I do think he owed them an explanation, given that he "seduced" them into drafting him by seeming to be enthusiastic about playing for them, had he expressed reservations, they probably would have taken Jiricek, and he'd have gone #6, which would have cost him nothing (except being drafted by CBJ). This isn't the NFL or NBA or MLB, where draft slots have economic consequences.
So I think what upsets the Flyers I think was the deception, whether deliberate or just impulsive, which screwed with their decision making. And the unwillingness to even talk. There's a certain prima donna aspect to this (well, I thought it over and changed my mind but I won't even do an exit interview because after misleading them, I owe them nothing).
Again, you’re doing exactly what I’m describing here — contorting the circumstances to fit our particular grievances as Flyers fans; in this case, Morgan Frost’s treatment in the lineup.I'm not sure how you can look at the Ducks pathway of players and their time to the NHL vs The Flyers and say that it's not a piece for consideration. In a team starved for centers, Morgan Frost is still being healthy scratched to this day. 21 year old Zegras played 81 games last season. McTavish 80. They were far from perfect but they have an environment that let's them play and doesn't punish them for making a mistake while "vets" get to play like dogs hit consistently and never miss a game.
It's entirely possible that isn't even his reason for not wanting to be here. Maybe he just thinks cheesesteaks and peanut chews are disgusting. But you can't straight faced argue that the Flyers provide developmental opportunities on par with teams like the Ducks.
Nothing inherently wrong with it. What I'm saying is that I wouldn't really call that talking to the Flyers. That's still refusing to talk in my eyes. If they answered the phone and said one sentence and hung up, that's not talking. It's also not outright ignoring the Flyers calls. Nobody knows exactly what was or wasn't said. It doesn't mean that Briere is lying about being able to talk to their camp (properly, having an actual conversation) but it also doesn't mean that the story hasn't been spun to make it sound like Cutter's camp completely ghosted the Flyers either.And what's wrong with this? If the kid doesn't believe this is the right place for him or his development, or whatever reason he has, he's under no obligation to change his mind.
How are people not getting this?Don't you think that there's a chance that Briere saying that they never gave a reason is just GM speak?
Gauthier's representatives have also said that they talked to the Flyers at least in December in Colorado and in Sweden. You combine that with the fact that they've talked about the trade scenarios for months now. It wasn't radio silence.
I like Rachel Donner and Russ Cohen with their Locked On podcast. No silly rumors. You never want to kick your dog after listening. I listened to it for awhile and one day realized that Russ Cohen was the Russ who would play on my team in a co-ed softball league at Marconi. The weird part is that he's an uncanny doppelganger in appearance, voice, and temperament for an attorney that I work with. Whenever I'm discussing some legal aspect of a project with the colleague, I have this strong desire to ask about North American forward prospects.
I don't know about Russ Joy. If STG is anything like WIP or the Fanatic, I'll just put a radio on static or let an alarm continually go off, thank you.
Edit: He's not a very good softball player, although he did have shoulder problems. Real nice, unassuming guy though.
Can I have an opinion on this?TLDR; It's ok to recognize that you don't have to have an opinion on everything.
TLDR; It's ok to recognize that you don't have to have an opinion on everything.
I don’t give a damn about Cutter Gauthier (unless he becomes an elite goalscorer / all star).If Eliot Friedmann's comments are relevant/cogent, I think Gauthier did not like Briere's and Torts
"process", that you have to earn a spot on the Flyer's roster, plus he probably hated the idea of the Flyers not to expend a year on the ELC and had to play another year at BC.
For me, the kid can rot in hell for all I care, besides, I was never comfortable with him as a Flyer.
Now Barkey is the kind of Flyer I applaud....ahhhh......je ne sais quoi