GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,820
- 44,545
(EDIT)
Last edited by a moderator:
The reflexive blaming is silly, the onus is on Cutter and his family - they could have sat down for an hour with Briere and Jones, cleared the air, determined the situation couldn't be fixed and everyone moves on. Instead this weird radio silence as if Cutter is a criminal defendant wary of any statement that might indict him.Is it though? The only thing we have besides "I don't know" is speculation from Friedman and "it was a private family matter" from the Gauthier camp.
The Flyers camp: "I don't know, he wouldn't tell us why or even engage in conversation."
Cutters camp: "It was a private family matter."
Friedman: "I wonder if it had to do with them not burning a year of his ELC, possibly due to cap overages, plus not being guaranteed a roster spot."
They added Krajicek mid-season, but he stunk.
Not that I disagree necessarily, but "reflexive blaming is silly" followed by reflexively blaming Gauthier sure is a stance.The reflexive blaming is silly, the onus is on Cutter and his family - they could have sat down for an hour with Briere and Jones, cleared the air, determined the situation couldn't be fixed and everyone moves on. Instead this weird radio silence as if Cutter is a criminal defendant wary of any statement that might indict him.
The idea behind the entire thing of burning a year of these ELC’s is to get one year closer to where there’s no set limitation to what they can be paid. Is there a difference between what someone like Lyon would be paid after a year compared to Gauthier with their pedigree? Of course.That's correct. It's actually his entry-level contract because it's the one he entered the NHL with, as a player under 26 years of age.
Do you have any comment on the difference between a player signed under Article 9 and one signed under Article 10, or the overall difference between all the things a team needs to consider for 5th overall pick compared to an AHL goaltender?
Edit: You're right, Curufinwe. My mistake. But still - any thoughts on the differences? I can appreciate technical corrections, because I wasn't correct, but to be fair here, the theme of the comment (Lyon and Gauthier couldn't be two more different prospects) wasn't addressed in either of your comments.
Please read this out loud to yourself.The reflexive blaming is silly, the onus is on Cutter and his family - they could have sat down for an hour with Briere and Jones, cleared the air, determined the situation couldn't be fixed and everyone moves on. Instead this weird radio silence as if Cutter is a criminal defendant wary of any statement that might indict him.
i watched a lot of clips from this whole episode on TSN and sportsnet They have really ramped up the hype that Gauthier is a generational talent to dump on the flyers. But basically every show and commentator said that it is a prime destination for players. How they are treated, the facilities, the bond with community. Just a class Organization. This is bizarre.Of course Barnaby would feel this way. He is the type of player that the organization and caveman fans drool over.
It's the skill guys that people turn on.
Thought the same thing. And really caring that much about it without saying it is the end of the road, non-negotiable point from the get go to Briere is strange.Only thing that confuses me… if this is about money and money purely. Why go back to Bc? He cost himself a year of pay?
i watched a lot of clips from this whole episode on TSN and sportsnet They have really ramped up the hype that Gauthier is a generational talent to dump on the flyers. But basically every show and commentator said that it is a prime destination for players. How they are treated, the facilities, the bond with community. Just a class Organization. This is bizarre.
Thought the same thing. And really caring that much about it without saying it is the end of the road, non-negotiable point from the get go to Briere is strange.
Where did this generational talent thing come from? Hughes, Bedard, Makar are generational talents.
Gauthier is six months younger than Brink was when he led the NCAA in scoring and took Denver to the national championship.
I mean he's a solid prospect, should be a solid LW, but that's a far cry from "generational talent."
It would be about getting to RFA and UFA status earlier in that situation rather than a money in pocket thing if that actually was the sticking point.Only thing that confuses me… if this is about money and money purely. Why go back to Bc? He cost himself a year of pay?
The only difference is 900k I guessIt would be about getting to RFA and UFA status earlier in that situation rather than a money in pocket thing if that actually was the sticking point.
Not signing last March delayed that for him and maybe he took it as a slight from the organization for not following their alleged word.
I imagine Cutter will sign with the Ducks at the conclusion of BC’s season and the Ducks will be fine burning his year so in terms of future contracts there’s no difference between signing with the Flyers in the offseason last year and signing with the Ducks in March or April (if BC gets to the Frozen Four).
He wasn’t considered that until the trade. Excellent prospect by some a possible disappointment by others. Either dumping on Flyers or the media being the media. Something they can drag out for awhile.Where did this generational talent thing come from? Hughes, Bedard, Makar are generational talents.
Gauthier is six months younger than Brink was when he led the NCAA in scoring and took Denver to the national championship.
I mean he's a solid prospect, should be a solid LW, but that's a far cry from "generational talent."
Pretty much but as we've discussed elsewhere he'd likely get that back one way or another but... the deed was done.The only difference is 900k I guess
The reflexive blaming is silly, the onus is on Cutter and his family - they could have sat down for an hour with Briere and Jones, cleared the air, determined the situation couldn't be fixed and everyone moves on. Instead this weird radio silence as if Cutter is a criminal defendant wary of any statement that might indict him.
The ”big bad Bruins” were fine. When out gunned by the expansion upstart “bullies” that was where the line needed to be drawn.It came from the deep anti-Flyers bias that runs rampant through hockeydom. A lot of people are still VERY angry that the Flyers were mean in the 70s. A lot of people raised their kids to revile them too. Philadelphia are seen as blasphemers who defiled the sport and thus misfortune must be amplified and celebrated.
Is it though? The only thing we have besides "I don't know" is speculation from Friedman and "it was a private family matter" from the Gauthier camp.
The Flyers camp: "I don't know, he wouldn't tell us why or even engage in conversation."
Cutters camp: "It was a private family matter."
Friedman: "I wonder if it had to do with them not burning a year of his ELC, possibly due to cap overages, plus not being guaranteed a roster spot."
They added Krajicek mid-season, but he stunk.
I'm absolutely living the irony of our twitter "media" types slagging on him like a week after they were crying about how mean everybody was to Bonk.4. Someone who purposely cuts themselves out of a sense of self-loathing
The Flyers are doing a full court media press about Cutter rejecting the Flyers when it seems to be very clear there's a lot more that happened here.
I sont blame him one bit. It's unfortunate that we'll never get his side of the story here because of the ol' boys club that is hockey, but is love to hear his side somehow.
What happened there? Did he refuse to shake hands?
It seems that was the furtherest thing from their mind for a long while now.I too enjoy this "he's not a center" thing that has also only came up after the trade. You're kidding yourself if you don't think the Flyers were going to do everything within their power to have him be a Center.
But hey, Briere twisted the knife by calling him a LW so that's 100% what the plan they had for him was.