GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 194,824
- 44,552
(EDIT)
Last edited by a moderator:
I see we have moved the "players don't hate Torts" goalpost, to "the players that hate Torts suck who cares what they think".
As if the idea that Gauthier would hate playing for Torts is so farfetched. This is a coach voted most hated across the leauge by the players, who has beefed with 5 roster players (that we know of) already in his 1.5 year tenure, not to mention notoriously beefed with other players at every stop he's coached. But after *months* of telling us Cutter was an integral part of the future, now we question his ceiling. "We don't want players that don't want to play for Torts (even though everyone loves Torts), because that means something is wrong with them".
The excuses are baked into the narrative. Any line contrary to how great Torts is obviously hater non-sense. Nothing any player/executive/reporter could ever say will ever change the Torts boot licker's mind, because Torts can't possible be wrong. And neither can the advisers who advocate for him for that matter.
You say that Gauthier had complete lack of professionalism and communication but by your framing of the events he was quite clear to franchises pre-draft that he would only play one year of college hockey. When the Flyers proceeded to push that they entered f*** around and find out territory.From my POV, if Fletcher said one thing, that doesn't mean Danny is beholden to it. Also the situation changed drastically when leadership changed. It seems like under Fletcher, the fit with the plan was fine, but under new leadership, the fit wasn't there. I don't think it's really something you can point fingers at anybody about, as more as the relationship is simply a casualty of the larger change the Flyers are looking to make. It's a shitty situation both ways.
As a brand-new GM, you cannot hold to all the old GM's promises. You can't let a prospect roll over you either. You need to assert yourself as the leader of the organization, you need to assert your plan to rebuild, and Danny did that. I cannot begrudge him for it at all.
If there's anybody here that looks bad, it's CG imho, for his complete lack of professionalism and communication. I get he was pissed off about the money, but it's just money at the end of the day. I personally would rather have guys that play for the love of the game as the #1 reason, not money. That's the same approach I have to my job, I truly love what I do, and yes, I'm paid well for it, but money is secondary to the work itself. You don't become truly great at something because you like money... And I'll leave it at that.
Where there's smoke, there's fire... no doubt.
However, what's the average shelflife of a HC in the NHl? A young man just drafted by an org already afraid of potentially spending a year or two under a potential difficult coach ... so scared ... this is also pretty telling.
Lol wut?Let’s see what happens.
I don’t buy one word that comes from the mouths of these rats. Anything to preserve the image of the country club.
Rebuilds are not drafting 13th overall. This isn’t a rebuild. It’s a half ass retool attempt as always. Don’t fall for their BS.
Has any Flyer player demanded a trade? Lot's of players around the league do so every season.
The only two players who criticized Torts in CBJ were Dubinsky (after he was demoted to the 3rd line and then released a year later), and a scrub. Even Dubois, who clashed with Torts, went out of his way to state his trade demands were an issue with the GM, not Torts.
Hayes? Who cares, he fought the move to RW and either couldn't or wouldn't play defense - what coach wouldn't ream him a new one?
Torts isn't "hated," he just has a reputation that intimidates a lot of players, probably b/c a lot of players don't like being pushed (Hayes is a good example). AV, for example, was a far bigger asshole than Torts. Cassidy was forced out of Boston by his players (who then went belly up in the 1st rd while Cassidy kissed the Cup).
Canada, Buffalo, Columbus, and mystery team is my guess.Just listened to Frank Seravalli on Daily Face Off with Colby Cohen, Frank says that the reason the flyers had to call 18-20 teams is because they knew that cutter would not sign with 10+ other teams. Kid apparently had a list.
Come on now.You wonder how much he's willing to do whatever it takes to win a Stanley Cup. There's a reason why most Cup winning rosters are disproportionately Canadian: they will do whatever it takes to win a Cup. Not saying that Cutter doesn't care as much (his dad is Canadian so the Cup is likely revered), but someone whose priorities are elsewhere are a big red flag to me. But the Flyers organization may have just botched this entirely.
This is also a fair pointLets not pretend Cutter didnt need another year in college. He wasnt / isnt some finished product so if he did bail on the team because he didnt want to play a 2nd year in college, I blame him for that more. Just my opinion. He has an inflated view of his current ability.
Lol wut?
Everyone in hockey circles penciled the flyers in for a top 3 pick this year. They are outplaying their roster by some margin. What do you expect Briere to do? Start trading everyone for pennies on the dollar to drop out ranking?
This season has done wonders for Seeler and Walkers trade value.
It's true though
The Flyers wanted a change of culture. They've successfully installed a regime that turns away young players off the ice while preaching a doomed, unsustainable system on the ice. Once again some people don't realize the problem that everyone is complaining about isn't Cutter, Giroux, Ghost, Hayes, DeAngelo, Deslaurieurs, Provorov.... it's that ~this~ is exactly the culture that management wants. This is what they strived for the whole time. All the "we don't care who you are" and "be a f***ing Flyer"... it's all a dogwhistle for ~this~. They're happy. That's the problem. They're serendipitously eating rotten sushi for lunch because they think it's delicious while everyone looks on wondering what the f*** is wrong with them.
Arrogance or things being lost in the chaos of "change."I'm not sure I buy the ELC thing as being the primary cause, but whatever. I'm sure every player would prefer to start getting paid earlier, but the Flyers still held his rights for well beyond one year. His agent would and should be reminding his client of that. It's not like the Flyers have a history of going really conservative with core pieces as they approach their UFA years. If anything, they tend to jump too early and get themselves into future holes with long term contracts.
And even if it were true, why the hell would the Flyers not just bite the bullet? They certainly didn't have an over-crowded roster. They were the third worst team in the whole conference.
And even if it were true, why the hell would the Flyers not just bite the bullet? They certainly didn't have an over-crowded roster. They were the third worst team in the whole conference.
Drysdale is 21 and still a young prospect.Moving Gauthier should have been a step back, but they found a way to get “nhl ready talent” - which I am sure was a must have.
Cutting corners as always.
8 of the top 9 players on the 2020 Cup champs weren't CanadianIt's true though
So teams should just sign guys that aren't ready for the NHL because that's what they want? The NHL is earned, not given. Cutter didn't earn it with his play at BC against men. He was decent, not great. He would absolutely have been in the dog house with Torts for a good chunk of this year because he simply wasn't ready for NHL time, regardless of what he thinks. Believe it or not, professional talent evaluators tend to be a bit more objective than the talent themselves.You say that Gauthier had complete lack of professionalism and communication but by your framing of the events he was quite clear to franchises pre-draft that he would only play one year of college hockey. When the Flyers proceeded to push that they entered f*** around and find out territory.
By itself, yes, Briere is not beholden to anything that that Fletcher promised or did BUT he probably should have checked around with people in the franchise and found out about your TOP PROSPECT saying he would only play one year of college hockey. That falls on him, you bend the knee at that point or you reap what you sew.
Finally, we're definitely never going to agree on the "it's just money." It's these players' job and they have a finite time clock to get all of the money that they can. I can't put a percentage on it but i'd wager that a very large portion of professional athletes don't play these games for "the love of the game" they do it for the cash and that's perfectly within their right.
A lot of peoppe still seemingly think this is an issue with losing Gauthier(most people werent fond of the pick anyway), and they couldnt be further from the mark. It's about terrible process, and not realizing that constantly playing players like Deslauriers over giving kids ice time (cant have a kid on the 4th line!) And all these other dumb dinosaur tropes are driving them away from the new generation of players.
You can cater your audience to these bully watchers all you want, but this is the flip side of that. You have situations like this where kids with a limited career span have to maximize their earning potential (10-15 years) in a situation where they are already heavily restricted/capped on earnings for about a third of that. Keep your goons if you want, but its limiting roster space, which is limiting opportunities, especially in an organizarion who already has publicly admitted to playing vets for milestones over kids for development..
If he knew that he didn't want to play in Philly, why should he sit down and get lectured to by a bunch of Flyer flunkies?Looking back on this with the facts that we have from last night....ASF and Snow The Goalie guys (who i typically like to listen to) come off as a complete joke. ASF in particular with his "nugget" about Kevin Hayes, guy needs to check his sources more often.
Was immediately surprised with how little the return was, i mean respect to Drysdale but Cutter would seem to me to have a much higher value....however looking back at it all i guess he did the best he could.
Crazy stuff here
- This dates back to the fletcher era
- Jones was never able to have a single conversation with the kids people.
- Kid ghosted the team, his advisors advised him poorly.
- Held the flyers by the balls and maintained a no trade list of over 10 teams
- Wouldn't talk with John Leclair or Patrick Sharp
- Sent the college coach out to tell Leclair and Sharp that he wasn't going to talk to them...disrespectful.
- Jones and Briere flew out to Sweden and Cutter wouldn't even talk to them.