.Doubt they will report
I hadn't really noticed it out of him early on. I was impressed with his vision and ability to distribute the puck. The kid can pass. He's also really good handling the puck in tight situations. I thought criticizing him early on while the team was struggling was a bit ridiculous. When your team is 0-15 you don't point the finger at the 16yo. That's on quite few others before it's on him. After you and MJ5 pointed it out though, yeah that kid refuses to take more than 4-5 strides in a row. No effort on back checking. I hadn't noticed but he certainly has the appearance of someone who doesn't care. At U17's he put up the exact same stats as Quinton Byfield and Will Cuylle. Really small sample size but it makes you wonder. Someone should point out to him that last night Emmanuel Vella tied him in scoring. Matching his offensive output but in fewer games, so Vella now has a better ppg than him. He's being out worked and out played by his new line mate Jacob Winterton, that's for sure.Is it just me or does anyone else notice that #41 doesn't hustle or seem like he even wants to be there?
Is it just me or does anyone else notice that #41 doesn't hustle or seem like he even wants to be there?
He was the laziest skater that I saw in all of Rookie Camp, let alone the Main Camp, and I haven't seen anything from him since to convince me otherwise.Haven't been a fan of him all season.
He hasn't skated from day 1. Just looks lazy out there.
Like savard said, he's skilled when he has the puck, just won't work for it.
Most scouts, not all, had Flint selecting Veirling.Guys you have to do your home work.. Vierling was attractive as he had the points playing along side of Byfield plain a simple.. Not in even in the same discussion with Stranges, Cuylle, Drysdale, Perfetti, Perrault, and many more.. I had my first look at him before the draft and was surprised Flint took him with the 2nd pick..
Bianconi has been pretty good considering the situation. He's 16. He's going to be good. He's playing solid now, 20 games into his first season. What would your complaints about him even be? You can't really call Powers a failed pick just YET either. Bode Wilde didn't report as a 16 or 17yo for Saginaw. Is he a failed pick? Can't be certain how much of this was on BB, Stefan and McParlane either. I suspect that BB might have had more input on the top of the draft and less later on. Also, did Vierling play alongside Byfield or were they spending a lot of time as the 1c and 2C? Which would still mean he wasn't facing the oppositions top lines regularly. I'm not sure it's as simple as just looking good because of Byfield. I mean Messier and Federov didn't look good just because they had Gretzky and Yzerman y'know? Not to mention when they went to the U17 tournament with teams that were similar in talent, Vierling put up the exact same stats as Byfield and Cuylle. I'm not saying that coattail riding Byfield wasn't part of it. I'm just not certain it was, although watching him play gives that side of the argument little credibility.Vierling has been a failed pick for Flint so far, as was Jenik, and Power. Bianconi isn’t looking to good either. These were not just BB picks, but McFarlan and Stefan picks. The Jenik and Power picks are still unforgivable. This season they have failed as an OHL franchise. David Branch shares in the blame.
Am I wrong to assume Rolf has nothing to do with how the team is doing this year? It seems that the OHL braintrust should be in the best position to know how to achieve success in their own league. At least Rolf would have the motivation to succeed- it seems the current management hasn't been putting in a full effort..
That is the problem:
... We will have to trade because the #1 overall will not report
... Get more draft picks, then trade them
... Kick the can down the road a few more years
... We will keep losing
And the ugly cycle continues until Rolf is no longer the owner.
You are exactly correct.this is all on Branch and the league. Nilson shouldn't even be in the conversation about the state of the team at this point.Am I wrong to assume Rolf has nothing to do with how the team is doing this year? It seems that the OHL braintrust should be in the best position to know how to achieve success in their own league. At least Rolf would have the motivation to succeed- it seems the current management hasn't been putting in a full effort.
Except for the fact scouts tell their players about management, ownership, and how things are run. No question the Branch's (dad and son) have done a horrible job too. Add in Rolf and you have one cataclysmic fail IMO.You are exactly correct.this is all on Branch and the league. Nilson shouldn't even be in the conversation about the state of the team at this point.
Except for the fact scouts tell their players about management, ownership, and how things are run. No question the Branch's (dad and son) have done a horrible job too. Add in Rolf and you have one cataclysmic fail IMO.
.
That is the problem:
... We will have to trade because the #1 overall will not report
... Get more draft picks, then trade them
... Kick the can down the road a few more years
... We will keep losing
And the ugly cycle continues until Rolf is no longer the owner.
If I knew how to fix the Firebirds I would probably be an entirely different line of work however it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see the league running the team into the ground is s not how to do it. Either force an ownership change or hand it back to Nilson when he applies for reinstatement after this season is over. If he is serious about being a team owner he has the resources to repair his rep and bring in the right people to run it right. If he is not he will just sell anyway.In all honesty how would you fix Flint?
I want WrightIf Shane Wright gets exceptional status, which I assume he will, he has to agree to go to whoever picks him in order to get the status granted. So if you finish last, you'll get Shane Wright for 4+ years
Has anyone even seen sightings of BB, JS or Rolf for that matter at any of the games lately?