Cloned
Begging for Bega
- Aug 25, 2003
- 82,338
- 73,441
Defending your team on the mains is a lot more challenging than a thesis defense.Easier or harder than earning a doctorate? I feel like Recchi breezed through med school.
Defending your team on the mains is a lot more challenging than a thesis defense.Easier or harder than earning a doctorate? I feel like Recchi breezed through med school.
I admit I don't know much of what happened, noone does on February 5th there will be a press conference and that's when there will be something to talk about instead of just speculation.That's not what allegedly happened, and I think you should probably read some of the reporting about this case before brazenly equating it to other things that you're probably not all that familiar with either.
Feel free to disprove anything in that post and try to draw any parallel between what has transpired/what is known in this case and what happened at Duke beyond the barebones of "athletes accused of sexual assault in group sex situation"Thanks for your accounting of the non facts and one sided review of the situation.
It was very non useful….
“Why Kyle Dubas is actually underrated: a dissertation by Somedude presented to the main HFboard”Defending your team on the mains is a lot more challenging than a thesis defense.
You'd probably have more luck defending a flat Earth theory tbh.“Why Kyle Dubas is actually underrated: a dissertation by Somedude presented to the main HFboard”
Real simple, since apparently you're unable to read: if you're going to reference any prior instance where some female made up a claim, have the balls to just come out and say "yeah, I think this bitch is lying too." Otherwise, STFU about someone else lying in some past instance because that has no bearing on whether this incident really did occur or not.Huh? Why don't you just clarify your point then instead of this weird statement? You're making even less sense now.
3 names haven’t been out since day 1.the names are out there and 3 of the names have been out since day one
That sounds horrible and I feel for you and your friends having to deal with that. I think many of us have, or know people who have, experienced unpleasant experiences with so call “bunny boilers”.I think you're downplaying the likelihood of this happening. When I was in my late teens and early 20's, there was a girl who worked with the group of people I hung around with. Her nickname was "the predator" because she would sneak into the bedrooms of passed out guys and have sex with them. After it happened several times, we started watching out for each other and making sure she was never left alone with a passed-out buddy.
It makes me a little sick to my stomach, thinking about it now. Even her victims joked about it, but what happened was absolutely rape. And the only consequences she ever suffered was that no good guys would consider dating her.
3 names haven’t been out since day 1.
What is your day 1.
Or
They had a feeling that this has the potential to be hurricane of an Internet storm if she were to recant her consent.
And in these times of " get the best are and cut his balls off mentality"..... it may be wise to have some proof in real time video.
Updated post, to say no names.Regarding speculation, anyone responding here had best keep actual names out of it.
View attachment 810320
High profile athletes are coached to do this kind of thing.
Updated post, to say no names.
Don’t list names btw, just when was day 1.
I do understand and don’t disagree. Two very drunk people have sex - is it fair that one gender is going to be unfairly targeted as being the aggressor if things go wrong and the other person regrets a drunk decision? No it is not - again assuming everything was as consensual as a drunk agreement can be.The reason why I would disagree with that is because the situation I describe compares two people who really are equals in the situation, and far from being a rare case, it's probably the single most common one on American campuses. Part of gender equality means shedding the double standard that sex is only for men to enjoy and only for women to provide access to.
And let me be crystal clear, I am not talking about cases like Brock Turner. Only a very poorly worded California law -- one that was changed immediately after -- prevented him from receiving a much larger sentence. Just to add another case to my "it REALLY IS important how a law is worded" pile.
I was in the process of editing, in case they interpreted wrong what I was asking.You were fine as far I as was concerned, but let's just say that I could see what might come down the pike.![]()
I think you're downplaying the likelihood of this happening. When I was in my late teens and early 20's, there was a girl who worked with the group of people I hung around with. Her nickname was "the predator" because she would sneak into the bedrooms of passed out guys and have sex with them. After it happened several times, we started watching out for each other and making sure she was never left alone with a passed-out buddy.
It makes me a little sick to my stomach, thinking about it now. Even her victims joked about it, but what happened was absolutely rape. And the only consequences she ever suffered was that no good guys would consider dating her.
Real simple, since apparently you're unable to read: if you're going to reference any prior instance where some female made up a claim, have the balls to just come out and say "yeah, I think this bitch is lying too." Otherwise, STFU about someone else lying in some past instance because that has no bearing on whether this incident really did occur or not.
I thought i was in the clear before, but i guess it got deleted, not vague enough, by mid June of 2022, 3 of the names were tied to it3 names haven’t been out since day 1.
What is your day 1.
Don’t list names btw, just when was day 1.
Discuss or name names that you don't have proof that are involved?![]()
Halifax Police: sex assault investigation involving 2003 junior hockey team ongoing | TSN
Halifax Regional Police say an investigation into a historic sexual assault allegation against members of Canada's 2003 world junior hockey team is ongoing.www.tsn.ca
something else we wont be able to discuss shortly by the sound of it
Yup. Literally what else would she say if she felt she was in danger.Her saying it’s consensual on video means little IMO as there is a strong likelihood she was under duress. People have lied their ass off when they’ve thought themselves in danger. Recording multiple times is shady in itself. They knew they were doing something wrong and running a risk
for me 24 hours after the news first broke 3 names were mentioned right away and according to the rules that are strictly being enforced we can not talk about them. This was not just on this discussion site. I suspect that some of the media knew the names as when they mentioned who played on the team? The 3 names always got mentioned. If you can find the historic videos on youtube--3 names were mentioned right away and as the investigation continued the same 3 names kept on coming up.3 names haven’t been out since day 1.
What is your day 1.
Don’t list names btw, just when was day 1.