Your reading comprehension is severely lacking. I didn’t say that she was those things; I merely pointed out that there are other possibilities besides the players being rapists - which nobody seems to have a problem labeling the men alleged to be involved as, on the basis of absolutely zero evidence.
My use of those terms was intentional, to point out the hypocrisy of those who would be offended at the mere suggestion that the accuser could potentially be those things while finding nothing wrong with labeling the accused as something far more disgusting. And unlike the hypocrites in this thread I never called her those things or said she definitively was them - I simply gave a list of possibilities in which those were included, while at the same time pointing out that none of us know which of these many possibilities (if any) is the truth, and that we should therefore hold off on making any sort of judgement until we have more facts available with which to do so.
But apparently it’s ok here to label potentially innocent men as rapists, with zero evidence to support such a claim, but it’s not ok to even bring up the possibility that a woman could be other than a shining example of purity and good intentions.
In short, thanks to both you and the mods for proving my point.
lfpress.com
