Five members from Canada’s 2018 world junior team (Hart, McLeod, Dube, Foote and Formenton) told to surrender to police, facing sexual assault charges

Status
Not open for further replies.

ACLEVERNAME

Registered User
Jan 6, 2010
6,952
5,656
Documenting consent isn't suspicious in and of itself.

The documentation containing a girl reportedly wiping her eyes and slurring her words- words that heavily imply that she was pressured into saying them, ending with a phrase that doesn't make any sense? Suspicious

That they strongly felt the need to document consent a 2nd time in the same night, an hour later? Suspicious
This was an odd tidbit on the case that always kinda made me wonder. I will say outright that I am not a psychologist, nor am I a professional pornographer - but i do know that the opening and closing interview with statement of legal age and consent is a pretty normal thing in the adult film world (especially with newer/unknown actresses).

Is it at all possible that we are not looking at the diabolical actions of a group of deranged psychotic monsters and more the actions of a group of dumb horny kids who had grown and developed through their adolescence with pornh*b et al at the tip of their fingers?

It's a whole nother dirty road to go down here but we still have no idea of the effects or consequences of this kind of stuff has on developing minds in the new digital world. Monkey see, monkey do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Edenjung

TopG

Averaging over a like per post
Mar 2, 2018
1,921
2,103
GTA
Not if you're reading carefully, they haven't.

For instance:

"Five players from Canada's 2018 world junior team have taken a leave of absence from their current clubs in recent days amid a report that five members of that team"

If the players were identified, they would have said "amid a report that THESE five members...".

Anyhow, it sounds like you've found what you're looking for.

Just 1 example
 

jcs0218

Registered User
Apr 20, 2018
7,968
9,880
It is so sad and so stupid that these 5 players have ruined their hockey careers and have ruined their lives over this.

Star junior hockey players could have almost any woman they want and have it be consensual. They didn't need to do what they did.

Obviously something wrong with their values and their ethics.

They have thrown away millions of dollars due to their faulty way of thinking and behaving.
 

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,673
41,841
Personally, yes, people settle for financial compensation even if they are totally innocent. They usually do this under poor legal advice.

Insurance companies do not do this.


"According to a copy of the settlement agreement obtained by The Washington Post, neither Bauer nor Hill is paying to settle the case, and each will bear their own attorneys’ fees. Both sides continue to deny the other’s claims, according to the agreement.

In a separate agreement, Hill’s insurance company, which had covered her defense, will pay her $300,000, records show."

Since you replied, I went back to look at the story again. Bauer didn't even pay her a settlement, sounds like both they dropped the lawsuits they had against each other. (he sued her for defamation).

She got a payment from her own insurance company, per her lawyer, sounds like reimbursed legal fees.
 

Bear of Bad News

"The Worst Guy on the Site" - user feedback
Sep 27, 2005
14,118
29,187

Just 1 example

Nothing in that directly says that

"Five members of the 2018 world junior team...have been granted indefinite leaves of absence this week by the pro teams they play for."

Are the five players surrendering.

You're drawing the conclusions. Yes, they probably set it up so that you'd do that (and they wouldn't have to).
 

Hank Plank

Registered User
Jun 5, 2012
9,442
7,390
Alberta
It is so sad and so stupid that these 5 players have ruined their hockey careers and have ruined their lives over this.

Star junior hockey players could have almost any woman they want and have it be consensual. They didn't need to do what they did.

Obviously something wrong with their values and their ethics.

They have thrown away millions of dollars due to their faulty way of thinking and behaving.
Unbelievable.
 

Bear of Bad News

"The Worst Guy on the Site" - user feedback
Sep 27, 2005
14,118
29,187
The post I just deleted of yours describes the players receiving leaves of absence. The article DOES NOT DIRECTLY SAY THAT THESE ARE THE FIVE PLAYERS SURRENDERING.

Good night.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GreeningOil

colchar

Registered User
Apr 26, 2012
7,867
1,711
Better to just name them than this reality show type reveal leading to all kinds of speculation.

Well if members of that team start disappearing from their current team's roster, that might be a good indication.
 

New User Name

Registered User
Jan 2, 2008
13,099
2,088
I understand why the mods deleted my post as it just lists players being granted leave. We are just speculating about the reasons for the leave.
 

toddkaz

Registered User
Nov 25, 2022
6,153
3,778
This thread is not allegedly about a gang-rape case. It's right in the thread title. The verdict doesn't need to be in for you to know that the topic is not a pleasant one.
Its still alleged sweetie. No one is guilty of anything. In my country people are innocent until proven guilty.

That only applies to an actual criminal trial it doesn't apply to the court of public opinion.
Sorry, it also applies to my morals too. I don't partake in the pitchfork justice.
 

Hank Plank

Registered User
Jun 5, 2012
9,442
7,390
Alberta
That only applies to an actual criminal trial it doesn't apply to the court of public opinion.
True but this has limits, hence several high profile successful lawsuits we've seen recently. You go around in public telling everyone willy-nilly a person is guilty that could end up costing you a pile of $$$$.
 

McJC

Registered User
May 2, 2010
4,007
1,187
Edmonton
Maybe a dumb question but what does it mean when the police is asking someone to "surrender"? Is that the equivalent of placing someone under arrest?
 

AnInjuredJasonZucker

Registered User
Feb 21, 2014
5,670
9,407
I understand the context just fine. The argument is guilty or not based on "if they did it". According to whom? Some all knowing all seeing being?
Well, yes. That is not speculating on their guilt, but the fact that acquittal in court is not the same as being proven innocent. People often forget that when they say that the truth will come out when the verdict is handed down.
 

ACLEVERNAME

Registered User
Jan 6, 2010
6,952
5,656
At what point can we start speculating? There's so much noise out there from reputable insiders that's likely accurate
Scribble all your speculations on a scrap of card, put it into a glass bottle and then throw it into the sea. You'll feel better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad