ACLEVERNAME
Registered User
- Jan 6, 2010
- 7,564
- 6,670
This was an odd tidbit on the case that always kinda made me wonder. I will say outright that I am not a psychologist, nor am I a professional pornographer - but i do know that the opening and closing interview with statement of legal age and consent is a pretty normal thing in the adult film world (especially with newer/unknown actresses).Documenting consent isn't suspicious in and of itself.
The documentation containing a girl reportedly wiping her eyes and slurring her words- words that heavily imply that she was pressured into saying them, ending with a phrase that doesn't make any sense? Suspicious
That they strongly felt the need to document consent a 2nd time in the same night, an hour later? Suspicious
Is it at all possible that we are not looking at the diabolical actions of a group of deranged psychotic monsters and more the actions of a group of dumb horny kids who had grown and developed through their adolescence with pornh*b et al at the tip of their fingers?
It's a whole nother dirty road to go down here but we still have no idea of the effects or consequences of this kind of stuff has on developing minds in the new digital world. Monkey see, monkey do.