The Grim Reaper
Registered User
Welp, I went one page too far in this thread.
I appreciate the explanation.The one and one thing alone I am doing in that post is refuting the assertion that "documenting consent is proof you are guilty, because no innocent person does that", by citing the sort of sexist double standards those young men would have encountered and heard about during the time they were sexually active, and that in the case where these boys are innocent and the charges are false, they would easily and also have done the same thing.
In no way am I equating what the prosecution alleges happened with a typical drunken hookup, no.
And if both parties were comparably intoxicated and both parties were thus unable to consent? Do we just go with the usual double standards?
Odd, that's not Phil Kessel.
This could have been a great Lounge thread - and god knows the Lounge needs a quality thread, since it hasn't had one in years - but no, it gets showcased here instead.I was at a gourmet burger place and decided to try a bacon cheeseburger with peanut butter. Delicious, but philosophically I didn't know what to think
Keeping it specific to the London case(if you can get off your soapbox for just a second), when was the last time we've heard of 7-8 Women Hockey Players taking a drunken guy up to their rooms, then having repeated sex with him. Also throw in asking him to shower afterwards, and sign a consent form, while they loomed over him, as a group.
The answer is, it doesn't happen! Quit pretending that it does.
I appreciate the explanation.
Best grilled cheese I've ever made: bacon, smoked gouda, Granny Smith apple.
This could have been a great Lounge thread - and god knows the Lounge needs a quality thread, since it hasn't had one in years - but no, it gets showcased here instead.
I blame Christina Woloski for this.
From what I've read it says that John Does 1-8 committed acts towards the woman so why are only 5 players being charged?
-You people make me sick
"A grilled cheese consists of only these following items. Cheese. Bread with spread (usually butter). This entire subreddit consist of "melts". Almost every "grilled cheese" sandwich i see on here has other items added to it. The fact that this subreddit is called "grilledcheese" is nothing short of utter blasphemy.
Let me start out by saying I have nothing against melts, I just hate their association with sandwiches that are not grilled cheeses. Adding cheese to your tuna sandwich? It's called a Tuna melt. Totally different. Want to add bacon and some pretentious bread crumbs with spinach? I don't know what the hell you'd call that but it's not a grilled cheese.
I would be more than willing to wager I've eaten more grilled cheeses in my 21 years than any of you had in your entire lives. I have one almost everyday and sometimes more than just one sandwich. Want to personalize your grilled cheese? Use a mix of different cheeses or use sourdough or french bread. But if you want to add some pulled pork and take a picture of it, make your own subreddit entitled "melts" because that is not a f***ing grilled cheese.
I'm not a religious man nor am I anything close to a culinary expert. But as a bland white mid-western male I am honestly the most passionate person when it comes to grilled cheese and mac & cheese. All of you foodies stay the hell away from our grilled cheeses and stop associating your sandwich melts with them. Yet again, it is utter blasphemy and it rocks me to the core of my pale being.
Shit, I stopped lurking after 3 years and made this account for the sole purpose of posting this. I've seen post after post of peoples "grilled cheeses" all over reddit and it's been driving me insane. The moment I saw this subreddit this morning I finally snapped. Hell, I may even start my own subreddit just because I know this one exists now.
You god damn heretics. Respect the grilled cheese and stop changing it into whatever you like and love it for it what it is. Or make your damn melt sandwich and call it for what it is. A melt."
So I guess that Dube is not a hero for acknowledging his mental health and doing something about it?
Bell let's talk day and using mental health as a reason to go to visit the London police.... Classy.
From what I've read it says that John Does 1-8 committed acts towards the woman so why are only 5 players being charged?
You want your mind blown, eat a peanut butter and pickle sandwich.I was at a gourmet burger place and decided to try a bacon cheeseburger with peanut butter. Delicious, but philosophically I didn't know what to think
From what I've read it says that John Does 1-8 committed acts towards the woman so why are only 5 players being charged?
My mind would be blown if I ate that, it hates picklesYou want your mind blown, eat a peanut butter and pickle sandwich.
So does that potentially mean 3 players are getting away with it unless the assumption is that she was so intoxicated that she couldn't count.Evidence may not exist to warrant charges for JD 6-8. Which is why I and many others have mentioned that the charges being laid in the first place is a huge statistical indicator of likely guilt. Charges don't come up lightly.
Yeah, this was about the first post in that thread. It quickly went downhill from there.
Also, goddamn am I hungry.
maybe she was still able to give consent to those 3 players.So does that potentially mean 3 players are getting away with it unless the assumption is that she was so intoxicated that she couldn't count.
It’s a day wear bell brings mental health awareness across their platforms"Bell let's talk day"
What?
So does that potentially mean 3 players are getting away with it unless the assumption is that she was so intoxicated that she couldn't count.
From what I've read it says that John Does 1-8 committed acts towards the woman so why are only 5 players being charged?
Where did you read this?
It just means they lack evidence to charge the rest.So does that potentially mean 3 players are getting away with it unless the assumption is that she was so intoxicated that she couldn't count.
"You'll have plenty of time to focus on your mental health - your last day is Friday."It’s a day wear bell brings mental health awareness across their platforms
Then shortly after they do their cutbacks and fire people
I mean if we are considering this to be R*** then coming up for pizza and not doing anything else is absolutely heinous and no way that player deserves to be in the NHL.Could also be that the other JDs didn't participate in any actual activity and simply left the room. One of the JDs, for instance, is alleged to be someone who simply came up for pizza and was off-put by the sexual activity breaking out and so left the room.
So 3 players are getting away with it, or atleast the fact they could have stopped it but didn't or reported it but didn't. What does lack of evidence really mean in this situation like did 3 players not commit the act so that's why they got away with it? If I'm the NHL no way I think those 3 players deserve to be in my league.It just means they lack evidence to charge the rest.
Especially since he reportedly said he stayed for 10 minutes before leavingI mean if we are considering this to be R*** then coming up for pizza and not doing anything else is absolutely heinous and no way that player deserves to be in the NHL.
So 3 players are getting away with it, or atleast the fact they could have stopped it but didn't or reported it but didn't. What does lack of evidence really mean in this situation like did 3 players not commit the act so that's why they got away with it? If I'm the NHL no way I think those 3 players deserve to be in my league.