If you're interested in discussing, then why not head over to Reddit? In fact the Reddit thread (not even hockey related) is a perfect example of why such discussions shouldn't be allowed. They're acting like criminal investigators and trying to get in contact with friends/family basically anyone related to the 5 players.
Is it really that unreasonable for her to not expect 4 of his cavemen friends to randomly show up in the room?It is all part of self respect and you are right. But don't you think it is a bad idea to get drunk and go to someones hotel room?
If some folks yearn for it to be easy, just say the word and we can remove you from the thread.
Imagine you are a woman in a room with several men who just gangraped you, and now they're telling you to say something on camera. They have already proven to you that they have zero regard for your physical safety, so chances are you'll say whatever you think you have to in order to get out of that room.Isn't she on camera giving consent?
View attachment 809535
I'm not sure what argument you can make re: being coerced into giving consent, or feeling pressured to, but that response by the woman seems quite blatantly consensual if true.
People on reddit are such f***ing losers.
Same with people who use twitter
People who use HFboards are only partially uncool
A key fact is her level of intoxication, and the players' awareness of her intoxication.Isn't she on camera giving consent?
View attachment 809535
I'm not sure what argument you can make re: being coerced into giving consent, or feeling pressured to, but that response by the woman seems quite blatantly consensual if true.
I haven’t said a single thing about it other than what I just said. No need to threaten me.
No it can’t lolYup, it can be a legal problem if names are mentioned until there is an official statement but everyone knows who they are by now.
I belong to a fantasy hockey dynasty league. A gm in our league was talking about Brian Burke cheating on his wife and calling the chick he was banging a ditch pig. Burkes lawyers sent a cease and desist to the league and contacted our league to get information about the specific poster. Fun stuff. This was like 11 or 12 years ago.Nobody on HF is getting sued for saying someone’s name lol
Nobody on HF is getting sued for saying someone’s name lol
He was speculating that it was a threat!It wasn't a threat. It was an offer for anyone who's tired of talking about what we can't talk about.
Isn't she on camera giving consent?
View attachment 809535
I'm not sure what argument you can make re: being coerced into giving consent, or feeling pressured to, but that response by the woman seems quite blatantly consensual if true.
That's going to be the argument by the lawyers for the players. And the crown is going to have a different argument, probably with evidence showing the video isn't an accurate depiction of what really happened. Maybe even arguing "she was coached into saying those things, and her intoxicated state made it impossible for her to truly consent."I'm not sure what argument you can make re: being coerced into giving consent, or feeling pressured to, but that response by the woman seems quite blatantly consensual if true.
Lol how did Burke even find out about it?I belong to a fantasy hockey dynasty league. A gm in our league was talking about Brian Burke cheating on his wife and calling the chick he was banging a ditch pig. Burkes lawyers sent a cease and desist to the league and contacted our league to get information about the specific poster. Fun stuff. This was like 11 or 12 years ago.
Yeah. I think so.I have a feeling there's a language barrier at play here. We can teach our children not to harm others and to protect themselves at the same time.
It wasn't a threat. It was an offer for anyone who's tired of talking about what we can't talk about.
Isn't she on camera giving consent?
View attachment 809535
I'm not sure what argument you can make re: being coerced into giving consent, or feeling pressured to, but that response by the woman seems quite blatantly consensual if true.
Not enough proof or less actual involvement making it a different category of infraction I guess.I wonder what happened with the supposed other three players involved? Wasn’t it a total of 8?
He was speculating that it was a threat!
You do have the freedom to talk. No one is stopping you from setting up a message board with your own posting rules.Or... people could just be allowed the freedom to talk.