Mantis
I am a doctah
Lord knows I am…DUDE I hate those ads like I'm not trying to get a boner while reading shitty trade proposals
Lord knows I am…DUDE I hate those ads like I'm not trying to get a boner while reading shitty trade proposals
I’m gonna need a business card…. You know, for a friend…..The safeguards are the bail court and, of course, the entire justice/trial system.
That said, to seek a warrant for arrest, yes, the police would have to present their case to a judge and convince them to endorse their application. Warrantless arrests can be done, however, under s. 495(1) of the Criminal Code:
- 495(1) A peace officer may arrest without warrant
- (a) a person who has committed an indictable offence or who, on reasonable grounds, he believes has committed or is about to commit an indictable offence;
- (b) a person whom he finds committing a criminal offence; or
- (c) a person in respect of whom he has reasonable grounds to believe that a warrant of arrest or committal, in any form set out in Part XXVIII in relation thereto, is in force within the territorial jurisdiction in which the person is found.
Challenging such warrantless arrests after the fact and getting evidence tossed on bad arrests is pretty much my bread-and-butter as a defence lawyer. Police make warrantless arrests at their own risk. Usually they're pretty careful to make sure they have the requisite grounds so that guys like me can't get important evidence excluded at trial.
let it go my guy. you're more than welcome to share seravallis tweets elsewhereSo let's just call it hearsay because we feel like it!
I think its more to do with the fact rape allegations can ruin lives so its very important to make sure its official before naming names.So let's just call it hearsay because we feel like it!
What do you mean, "What ever happened..."? It's still a legal principle and hasn't gone anywhere in the legal system.What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty. Remember the Duke Lacrosse players. The woman in question was proven to be a liar and is now in prison for 2nd degree murder.
Being charged with sexual assault (especially as a person who plays a sport for entertainment in the public eye for a living) isn't "ho hum, shit happens"Because shit happens and life goes on?
I have had to deal with a lot of traumatic events in my life (currently dealing with one right now) but I still have to get up and go to work every day, be a parent to my children, be there for my friends, and try to find as much fulfillment in life as I can.
Only one team did that no? And they might’ve just been getting ahead of it or it was genuinely for mental health reasons because finding out this was about to come out would be pretty bad for your mental health.Well all five names are out now. Can't talk about them here, but a quick google search makes it pretty clear.
I get that teams can't come out and say what is going on, but claiming these guys are on leaves for Mental Health is a pretty rough look.
They're worried about getting a letter from these guys:It's almost like they don't want any names posted.
So, do any of the alleged players have the right to not take a leave of absence and continue playing during an ongoing investigation? Can a player maintain their presumption of innocence and continue playing until proven otherwise?
You’re not? It’s the whole reason I’m hereDUDE I hate those ads like I'm not trying to get a boner while reading shitty trade proposals
Because the IIHF never engages in collective punishment...How long …. Never !!!
Get off the soap box! Over reaction is un needed.
Only an imbecile would think the punishment of innocent young Canadian players ( future participants of WJC) that had nothing to do with this is the best coarse of action
"shit happens and life goes on" is quite a way to describe a gang rapeBecause shit happens and life goes on?
I have had to deal with a lot of traumatic events in my life (currently dealing with one right now) but I still have to get up and go to work every day, be a parent to my children, be there for my friends, and try to find as much fulfillment in life as I can.
Not the players, but the system itself. That would create a big impact.I doubt it. These former world junior players aren’t that big of celebrities.
Definitely, but sharing potentially relevant information isn't an allegationI think its more to do with the fact rape allegations can ruin lives so its very important to make sure its official before naming names.
Didn’t know if there was a NHL equivalent of a restricted list in MLB or NFL and if players would face similar restrictions like Quenneville did to be re-instated (who was never convicted of any wrong doing).Assuming Bettman does anything at all.
I don’t know if they’d be on paid leave or suspended.So take away their livelihoods before a shred of evidence has been submitted, much less a guilty verdict entered?
Only one of the 5 players who have gone on leave in the past few days was claimed to be on leave for mental health reasons.Well all five names are out now. Can't talk about them here, but a quick google search makes it pretty clear.
I get that teams can't come out and say what is going on, but claiming these guys are on leaves for Mental Health is a pretty rough look.
Or the other 3 are in a lot more troubleI do not want to speculate….!
But the initial report had 8 players in the room and todays report has 5 players asked to report!
Basic math 8-5 = 3 players getting the Chevy treatment ( Chicago Fiasco) - they knew something but don’t know something!
View attachment 809397
Pretty sure that's EXACTLY why you're reading the shitty trade proposals.DUDE I hate those ads like I'm not trying to get a boner while reading shitty trade proposals
Because shit happens and life goes on?
I have had to deal with a lot of traumatic events in my life (currently dealing with one right now) but I still have to get up and go to work every day, be a parent to my children, be there for my friends, and try to find as much fulfillment in life as I can.
true but its the potentially part thats the issue, when it changes from potentially to just relevant then we will be able to name names. Even if we are 99% sure who it is, that 1% means we can't name names till anything official is released.Definitely, but sharing potentially relevant information isn't an allegation