ToneDog
56 years and counting. #FireTheShanaClan!
I knew he had gone senile after he was pressured by the fans to bring Wendel back.Cliff had his moments, yes.
I knew he had gone senile after he was pressured by the fans to bring Wendel back.Cliff had his moments, yes.
1st and 2nd year university students demanded "good grades" just for "existing"? like I know "existing" is a quote from Finn which is the other person in you people because he put the word between quotes as well, as if that is actually the response of his millenial employees when they are asked why they deserve a promotion. when clearly none of these people will have ever said that, it's his interpretation of their response, but it's between quotes like it was spoken by one or more of the people he is criticizing.I don’t see any misplaced quotation marks in his post.
The Kings had the pieces, which is the whole point.You mean, like the 2014 LA Kings?
No, not really, but strange things happen.
Those are all mainly minor penalties with the odd five-minute major thrown in. Ten minutes for the Foligno deal, and in my books another five on what they gave up for O'Reilly.I think your selling Dubie short , from where he started from it's easy to make an argument that Dubas was as bad or worse than the GM's you listed.
Kadri for Kerfoot and Barrie
1st plus for Foligno
then there was Dubas grossly overpaying for bottom pair D
two 2nds and a 3rd for Gio
1st and a 2nd for MaCabe and a 4th liner
he also left us without a 1st in 2025 and without a 2nd rd pick for four consecutive years
then you have aging the declining players like Gio/Brodie/JT he left behind and a D core that pretty much had to be almost completely rebuilt
Or when he signed Finger thinking he was another D man……..I knew he had gone senile after he was pressured by the fans to bring Wendel back.
The 2014 Kings were then seen as a very flawed team that barely made the playoffs, and it was a major surpriise that they won that year.The Kings had the pieces, which is the whole point.
Yes it would be quite a story had any of those Leafs teams won two or three rounds.
I'll call you on that too.
I'm not a gambler, but I just visited this site -- FanDuel Sportsbook -- and the saw the odds on winning the Stanley Cup as follows:
someone else does.
You can always tell....Those are all mainly minor penalties with the odd five- minute major thrown in. Ten minutes for the Foligno deal, and in my books another five on what they gave up for O'Reilly.
The deals I mentioned are all game misconduct with the possibility of supplemental discipline. Courtnall for Kordic? Who in their right mind does that?
Anyhow, it's all water under the bridge now. Somehow, amazingly, the Leafs' franchise survived.
If you hate the Leafs, then why follow the team and watch their games?You can always tell....
Blue n white disease
Dubas apologist.
Every random excuse we've all heard before.
They had stars size goaltending D scoring checkers and coaching.The 2014 Kings were then seen as a very flawed team that barely made the playoffs, and it was a major surpriise that they won that year.
It goes to show that if you make the playoffs, you have a chance.
Look at the other side, too. How often has the Cup favourite gone out early? Tampa? Boston?
The Stanley Cup tournament is highly unpredictable.
The whole thing was a surprise.They had stars size goaltending D scoring checkers and coaching.
Finishing 8th was the surprise.
Those of us that watch hockey regularly weren’t surprised.The whole thing was a surprise.
The World is full of surprises -- every day and every year.
Let's cheer for the Leafs and hope for the best!
Go Leafs Go!
The whole thing was a surprise.
The World is full of surprises -- every day and every year.
Let's cheer for the Leafs and hope for the best!
Go Leafs Go!
It's so clear. He wants a puppet and he got it.
John Wooden won his first NCAA Basketball championship in his 16th season with UCLA. That was the first of ten championships, which is still the record for the NCAA.
That only happened because UCLA was committed to the process. They were winners because they stuck with a long-term plan, even when the immediate results weren't there for a very long time.
I don't mind waiting if the Leafs are competitive and are building in the right direction. That gives them the best chances of success.
In many fields, it takes a long time to be an overnight success
On the other hand, the Leafs could clean house by firing Shanahan, Treliving and Keefe, and start fresh with another management group until they haven't won a Stanley Cup in the next five years, and then fire them too. Rinse and repeat.
I would rather they stick with the plan they're on, keep knocking on the door and going in the direction they've taken. Every year they make the playoffs is one more chance to win the Stanley Cup championship. It's a brutal, unpredictable tournament, and seriously any playoff team can win.
Come to think of it Boy Wonder does resemble Pinocchio………It's so clear. He wants a puppet and he got it.
as a former union worker I can relate to how Shanahan has change since he had to lace em up, it’s no different then when you see a brother come off the tools and go into management, it takes but a week for them to forget how the jobs done and start coming up with stupid ideas to screw up a perfectly good way of doing the job……….The real problem obviously was Shanahan hiring Dubas. Makes you wonder how many headshots he took while playing?
If you hate the Leafs, then why follow the team and watch their games?
Leafs management makes their fair share of mistakes in every season, but surely everything they do isn't all bad?
Wouldn't it be more fun to pile on the Bruins or the Habs than to have a never-ending civil war in Leafs' Nation? I don't understand the need to be for one manager and against another -- or against them all for that matter.
Apparently, when the Leafs lose for 50+ years that's all the current managers' fault, but when they win for seven it's not to their credit -- for whatever marginal success they have had, which is at least enought to build on.
Lovely story. I believe I've read this book before, almost word for word.If you hate the Leafs, then why follow the team and watch their games?
Leafs management makes their fair share of mistakes in every season, but surely everything they do isn't all bad?
Wouldn't it be more fun to pile on the Bruins or the Habs than to have a never-ending civil war in Leafs' Nation? I don't understand the need to be for one manager and against another -- or against them all for that matter.
Apparently, when the Leafs lose for 50+ years that's all the current managers' fault, but when they win for seven it's not to their credit -- for whatever marginal success they have had, which is at least enought to build on.
Dubas left for more money and autonomy when he could not get it here. And for that Kyle, a million thanks.There at least seems to be some evidence that Shanny is part of the problem.
"IF" reports are true that Dubas wanted to break up the core and Shanny said no ( which seem to be true based on they just resigned Matthews and all reports indicate resigning Nylander) then Shanahan has to take responsibility.
Dubas left for more autonomy and Shanny is still signing off on the Leafs players getting paid more than just about any other team.
I think it's potentially fair to look at Shanahan if one is not fully enthused with any of the players which comprise the core. A team wishing to establish any kind of precedent for contracts really has to enforce that during the RFA deals though and not once the players begin to have an increased amount of leverage.There at least seems to be some evidence that Shanny is part of the problem.
"IF" reports are true that Dubas wanted to break up the core and Shanny said no ( which seem to be true based on they just resigned Matthews and all reports indicate resigning Nylander) then Shanahan has to take responsibility.
Dubas left for more autonomy and Shanny is still signing off on the Leafs players getting paid more than just about any other team.
Sounds about right. That's why with Shanny we prioritize stars and Dubas would rather fill up the space with a bunch of money puckers (Hyman anyone?).There at least seems to be some evidence that Shanny is part of the problem.
"IF" reports are true that Dubas wanted to break up the core and Shanny said no ( which seem to be true based on they just resigned Matthews and all reports indicate resigning Nylander) then Shanahan has to take responsibility.
Dubas left for more autonomy and Shanny is still signing off on the Leafs players getting paid more than just about any other team.
Preach HoglundSounds about right. That's why with Shanny we prioritize stars and Dubas would rather fill up the space with a bunch of money puckers (Hyman anyone?).
I'd take my chances with shanny. That over the top presentation for Tavares was lead by Shanny and Shanny liked Nylander the most in his draft year. Nylander is a player our staff usually skips
With Dubas gone we finally make real depth signings like Bertuzzi