He’s being untruthful, period. The question is on the current Kings player development philosophy, which emphasizes heavy AHL involvement for everyone, including players taken high in the first round, more so than any other team in the league. He could have defended it without making historically inaccurate comparisons, which would have been fine, fans can agree or disagree with him, but at least it's his opinion, he is entitled to his own opinion, but he isn't entitled to his own facts. The facts just don't back up what he said in any way, between 2006-2010 during the Kings accumulation of assets stage you had Kopitar, Doughty, Simmonds, Moller, Bernier, Johnson and Clifford make their NHL debuts without seeing any AHL time. That is seven players in five season span, compare that to the current Kings team and you have one player, a 22 year old middle six winger in laf. I'm sorry, one does not just "forget" something like that. And if someones memory is that poor and he did indeed forget, maybe he shouldn't use historical references to discuss or justify current things.
Your examples of those other players are fine, but nobody is saying that the Kings didn't have any prospects in the AHL back then, just that they didn't slow cook everyone like the current team does. Also, you are talking about secondary pieces, not top half of first round picks. There is just no way you can compare the developmental philosophy of Rob Blake's front office to that of Dean Lombardi's front office. You can say one is better than the other, but you can't say they are anything alike, it's not even close.