Okay, but we're on a board of die hards discussing why the team is where it is, so while we can all recognize the standings don't look good, the play itself matters more long term. I don't think we've played like a 4-7-0 team, that's backed up by the underlying metrics, just like the pens haven't played like a 4-6-2 team.
We're discussing whether DJ Smith should be this team's coach.
I don't think we've played like a 4-7-0 team. I also don't think we've played like a team that shouldn't be looking to upgrade its coaching staff.
Last year through 11 games:
3-7-1
28 GF, 39 GA
328 SF (8.5% S%), 377 SA (0.896 SV%)
This year through 11 games:
4-7
38 GF, 38 GA
353 SF (10.7 S%), 371 SA (0.897 SV%)
We're better offensively but still can't defend or stop pucks. Based on the amount of money spent and the acquisitions made, this has been a bad start. I'm still of the mind that the part of the game that coaching can impact the most is defense. DJ and his staff haven done a bad job over 3 seasons. We play way too loose. I'm sure some of the offensive players love it, but it's not winning hockey.
I know it's ages ago, but look back at the progression of the early Jacques Martin teams, filled with young, highly drafted players who didn't know how to play in their own end:
94/95 - 3.63 GA/game
95/96 - 3.55 GA/game - JM takes over at mid-season
96/97 - 2.85 GA/game
97/98 - 2.44 GA/game
98/99 - 2.18 GA/game
What's amazing is that it was almost instant. In the first 44 games of 95/96, Sens were giving up 4.1 goals/game. In the last 38 under JM? It went down to 2.9 goals/game.
Compare that to DJ:
19/20 - 3.35 GA/game
20/21 - 3.38 GA/game
21/22 - 3.22 GA/game
22/23 - 3.45 GA/game
Where's the progression?
IMO, Claude Julien seems like an obvious fit. In 19 NHL seasons, only twice have his teams averaged more than 3 GA/game.