I don't understand how you can suspect that Finland isn't producing great talents. There are more Finns in the NHL than ever and next season they should have over 50 Finns who play at least a game in the NHL. There's depth and there are stars. Also, at least one Finnish player was drafted in top 5 between 2016-2019. This year was poorer year as Lundell went 12th, but he has shown that the worries about his skating and offensive abilities were not serious. I am excited about his future as I am about Järventie's for example. I don't see a top 5 pick for Finns in 2021, but there will likely be a couple first rounders just like we have gotten used to. The last time a Finnish player wasn't taken in the first round was in 2009. Lambert is likely the next top 5 pick.
Things are better than they have been in a long time. For example, if you look at season 2014-2015 season you see that Koivu and Filppula had the best points out of Finns with 48 each. They barely made it to top 100 in points in the league being 96th and 98th. Koivu's PPG was 0,6. Last season, which had shorter regular season due to corona 48 points would have put them 5th best in scoring for Finns and Koivu's PPG would have been 6th best. Aho was 20th in points, Laine 27th, Teräväinen 29th and Barkov was 31st in the league.
If you look at the last full season 2018-2019 Koivu/Filppula would have been 7th best Finns in points and in PPG. Barkov was 10th in points in the league, Rantanen was 17th, Aho 21st, Teräväinen 36th and Granlund 92nd. These guys are also young and most are just entering their prime years.
Looking at points leaves out the defencemen. For long developing defenders was a problem for Finland but now that aspect is getting better. Heiskanen was amazing last season, especially in the playoffs. Lindell is great defence first -type of guy, Ristolainen, Määttä and Vatanen are fine top 4 defencemen, Jokiharju is developing and he's also already a top 4 guy with potential to grow into a top pairing guy. Välimäki missed last season but he's ready to take his spot next year. Heinola got games last season and surprisingly looked great. He could make the NHL as well the upcoming season. Then there are guys like Vaakanainen, Juolevi, Mikkola, Niku to name a few who look promising and should get games next season. While the defencemen can't match the forwards with as much high end players, there are still a lot of good players and more are coming.
Honestly, at the moment Finland's problem is goalies as a lot of the veterans are getting old and Finland hasn't produced top goalies in a while. Still I am hopeful that players like Kähkönen, Luukkonen and Annunen will be NHL goalies.
Sorry for the OT but I just can't understand how you doubt about Finland producing great talents when we are in the golden years. Yeah there's no Selänne to take home the Rocket trophy but other than that has there been better times for Finnish hockey on NHL level?
It's like you are trying to misunderstand me. But hey, look at what you are doing. You are almost proving my point by yourself. You are comparing Finland to former Finland, like ten or twenty years ago? I´m comparing with 2-5 years before and other nations such as Sweden and USA. Yes, Finland has a smaller population but hockey is not a big sport in USA and football is by far the most popular sport in Sweden. Finland lives for it´s hockey, it's almost like a religion. Beating Sweden or Russia in hockey is like Christmas. That makes it popular for the absolutely best kids to choose this sport in Finland. While in Sweden and other countries there is a possibility to loose these talents to football or other sports.
There for I don't understand why you wouldn't be open to have big expectations for a modern hockey country as Finland now is? Or bigger than you are having. You just can't compare Finland to generations from the 70´s and 80´s. The economy is a factor here as well. Many finns moved to Sweden to work and we all know hockey is an expensive sport.
The point I´m trying to make is that the scenario is totally different now and that it would be foolish to only focus on those 80´s generations.
The thing is that I agree with a lot of your opinions but you haven't understood me to the fullest. Perhaps because I've not explained it good enough. I´m comparing these players born 2000 and 2002 to players born 97-99 and perhaps even 2001 and 2003.
In my opinion Lundell and Kakko is nothing less than elite, no doubt. Heinola is very talented as well. All players born 2001.
But I´m comparing to these players before them. Vesalainen and Tolvanen were great talents at juniors, just as Heiskanen, Luukkonen, Vaakanainen, Jokiharju, Laaksonen, Ikonen etc. I don't really see that kind of talent this year or last year. Not that same kind of "Elite" or top six top, top four depth as before.
You could compare a player like Tolvanen to Simontaival and I would want to say that at the same age Tolvanen had reached a lot more impressing achievements than Kasper. He was producing at KHL-level and had already been a monster in junior tournaments before the gold.
Before that then? Players born 98 with prospects like Juolevi, Laine, Puljujärvi, Välimäki, Kuokkanen etc.
I mean just take a look at those rosters. Puustinen just made it to the team one year and he is one of the better players in Liiga at 21.
Before these tournaments started those years Finland were considered as one of the favorites, that's the difference. And yes, that is expected from a smaller country. Not being able to be big favorites every year, and I´m just stating this. That seems to confuse some people or make them mad, like they are trying to misunderstand or claim things I´ve never indicated.
This years guys are a lot more talented than players ten to fifteen years before them, but I´m not comparing to those Finnish generations when Tuukka Rask was almost the only highlight.
So, move along.
I will admit I´m seeing similarities with this roster to the Team Finland we saw in 2014. With Teräväinen leading a whole team just like Lundell will have to do this year. With Niemelä, Heinola etc being comparable to Lindell, Ristolainen and Honka. But I´m not sure Blomqvist can be just as good as Saros was back then, because he was so freakishly good. Teräväinen was so damn good and carried the team on his shoulders. Even if Lundell has the same or even more potential, those performances by Teräväinen was top5 performances for me in the WJC´s the ten last years, perhaps only beaten by Kuznetsov. So that means Lundell will have to be on his A game and that this team will need to perform crazy good to win the gold when Canada and Russia are getting most of their best players this year.