I generally like your posts but you literally said when we were giving up a ton of goals a few weeks back that the Rangers do better when they keep games low event.
Yes, and we certainly started out that way, but we've been playing more high-event games recently and doing ok.
If I had a choice, lower is probably better because the more chances are in the game, the more is left up to randomness, but at the end of the day, if it's pond hockey, and we end up with more chances, that's good. If it's low-event, and we end up with less, like the NJ series, that's bad.
I want to outplay the opponent, or at the very least, be competitive. I don't care how. I'm not going to complain about a sloppy game where we were the better team.
We weren't competitive in the playoffs. It was low-event and they had most of it. That's the worst kind.