17futurecap
Registered User
Brod played under 8 minutes at five on five, and him and Cuylle led the team in XGF%. He’s a fill in who won’t be on the playoff roster.
Tampa is headed in the wrong direction. I’d see what it would take to get stamkos from them fwiwWe should be able to handle Tampa.
Hedman still plays a f***ing ton of minutes for them and he low-key sucks ASSSSSSS at even strength now.
The guy's had too much mileage.
Tampa is headed in the wrong direction. I’d see what it would take to get stamkos from them fwiw
If you keep fil on ltir and dump goodrow it isn’t that badHow much are the Lightning going to cover?
He lets his emotions and the goalie union get in his way sometimes.Vally is way off base. He sounds like he posts on this board.
Cash backingWe’re not talking about practice Vally.
We’re talking about the game.
Not talking about practice.
What are we talking about?
Better yet they take Goodrow backIf you keep fil on ltir and dump goodrow it isn’t that bad
I don't think he saw it until the last minute.....from the look on Lindgren's face, I think he realized he'd screened Quick.I know Quick was excellent but that 4th goal was an absolute back breaker after Zib tied it
In terms of a situational save that one has to be made. Not a good turnover but very stoppable
We might have been the better team, maybe, but I find it hard to find any "good" in the way they had defensive and zone exiting meltdowns. Any team would have been able to take advantage, not just a good team like Florida.yup. more frustrated than angry. we were the better team. we’ve had a lot of these types of games on the other side. it happens.
He lets his emotions and the goalie union get in his way sometimes.
The goalie gave up 4 goals on a night the team played well and he's scrambling to explain it away.
I'm not blaming it all on Quick. He was fine. He made some big saves. He also, you know, gave up 4 goals. It happens sometimes. It's an ok thing to have happened. Like I always say, there doesn't need to be grand design on everything in hockey.
The goalie was ok, the team was good, and we still gave up 4 because sometimes that's life. He's trying to compute it, and it needs not be computed.
I think they wanted it alright. Their offensive pressure was pretty on point.Actually this PGT has been way more civil than I expected.
I excepted every other post to be about how we didn't want it enough.
If the rangers play like that against Chicago they score 7 lolWe might have been the better team, maybe, but I find it hard to find any "good" in the way they had defensive and zone exiting meltdowns. Any team would have been able to take advantage, not just a good team like Florida.
We play the exact same game against any squad, even Chicago, and you are looking at more losses than wins. The Rangers *are* better than that.
These games happen all the time in the playoffs.He’s right. He basically was saying it was a pond hockey or beer league game from both teams, and bad mistakes were made on both sides. And that you won’t win like that in the playoffs
It was a bad and sloppy game too often
Rangers play better when it's not wide open.These games happen all the time in the playoffs.
There was a 7-2 game and a 9-3 game in the Finals.
The Stars are seen as a tidy, contending team and they scored or gave up 6 goals every other game in the playoffs.
Go back and look at the scores from last year. 5, 6, 7 goal scores from teams all over the place. The game has changed.
Idk, in 7 games against the Devils we had like 2 expected goals the whole series and I hated that.Rangers play better when it's not wide open.
Rangers breakdowns tonight were more than Florida's breakdowns. Hence, the loss. And our breakdowns were bad enough that yes, even Chicago scores on them. Don't emulate this game. Emulate the game we beat TOR, or LA.If the rangers play like that against Chicago they score 7 lol
This is also a pure rush team, so they have to play this style to generate their chances.Rangers play better when it's not wide open.
He's acting like the playoffs are next week and he was over analyzing like this was game 7. It's late December during a holiday week. 2 good teams were a little loose but it wasn't a bad game by either. It was entertaining. That happens sometimes.He’s right. He basically was saying it was a pond hockey or beer league game from both teams, and bad mistakes were made on both sides. And that you won’t win like that in the playoffs
It was a bad and sloppy game too often
I like this team *this year* enough that we have the talent and plan to break through. FWIW I still think NJD beats the Rangers in 7 this year. Regardless if NJD makes the playoffs or not.Idk, in 7 games against the Devils we had like 2 expected goals the whole series and I hated that.
Generation was a bigger problem under Gallant than suppression was.
I like that we can generate. We never had games like this last year where we were staying in it because we can get chances. If we had breakdowns we would just get our asses kicked.
There's always something to complain about.This is also a pure rush team, so they have to play this style to generate their chances.
When we play tight is when this board starts talking about being boring.
If NJD doesn't make the playoffs and we do, Jersey will kick our asses in their dreams.I like this team *this year* enough that we have the talent and plan to break through. FWIW I still think NJD beats the Rangers in 7 this year. Regardless if NJD makes the playoffs or not.
They probably do. They're one of the best 5v5 teams in the NHL like they were last year.I like this team *this year* enough that we have the talent and plan to break through. FWIW I still think NJD beats the Rangers in 7 this year. Regardless if NJD makes the playoffs or not.