How? What has either of those done to create that much value? Beside Carlo fits well in Van.They can do a hell of a lot better value wise than Carlo + 2nd for Garland + Rathbone
I think the Miller trade talk is moot, I would be shocked if they trade him soon.
Yes. That offer blows
They can do a hell of a lot better value wise than Carlo + 2nd for Garland + Rathbone
I think the Miller trade talk is moot, I would be shocked if they trade him soon.
Well I changed my mind, concussions have derailed his future that is why Boston is willing to move himCarlo is extremely valuable. Big top-4 defencemen in their mid-20s signed long term at a great cap hit (4 years at 4.1m) are worth a tonne. The only reason the Bruins would trade him would be to upgrade another part of their roster and Garland doesn’t bring enough of that.
does it?
i don't see how we get much more than that for a rental player who the team has almost publicly declared they are no longer talking to (with the player himself dropping a clarifying press release)
the 1st is not worth much but liljegren is. we aren't getting byram for an unsigned bo.
I mean Boston can do much better. As Vector states above, a player like Carlo would be in high demand, Garland and Rathbone not so much. Boston says no to Carlo alone for those two, let alone the pick swap.How? What has either of those done to create that much value? Beside Carlo fits well in Van.
The Miller talk, they HAVE to trade him before his NMC kicks in. Although I do think he would wave it to get out of here if he still wants to win. Unless the Sedins have gotten to him and all that matters is being a "professional", playing for money rather than a cup or making the cup just a thing. Eliminate the emotions, do your job, which is entertaining the mob.
Yup. Definitely. But Aquilini appears to be keeping management working within his direction of bringing in current NHL players over futures.Seriously, rebuild already.
This team is going nowhere at this trajectory.
Bo+Kuz are gonna bring a f*** ton of picks/prospects.
If you can trade other players for picks its gonna be cherry on top.
We are already f***ing suck, if the nucks are gonna be a shit team then might as well aim for top 5 picks. I'd trade petey/hughes as well if the price is right.
This is definitely the last chance aquaman is gonna get.
Rebulid or watch his team's value plummet even further.
Rangers/Kings/Red Wings/etc. are already ahead of us, their rebuild started like a couple seasons ago.
little early to drop Demko, the dude had a bad start to the season and has been injured for the last couple weeks......I really can't stand Boeser, Garland, OEL, and Myers anymore. I'm really close to adding Demko to this list as well.
30 points in 53 games between Boeser/Garland
20 points in 59 games for OEL/Myers
And the fact that these clowns are taking 26 million in cap space (31 million if you include Demko) is mind boggling to me.
No, that is the mistake that has happened too much here, hanging on past the best before date and then squandering asset value.little early to drop Demko, the dude had a bad start to the season and has been injured for the last couple weeks......
Would our owner allow a futures return for Demko? Wouldn’t the return have to be a young NHL player? Love to get the rebuild started with high picks, but don’t see our owner allowing that direction.No, that is the mistake that has happened too much here, hanging on past the best before date and then squandering asset value.
If the rumoured offer from LA is accurate they would offer up a 1rst round pick. Take it.
Demko will have no use here except to cover up holes on the team as him and Markstrom have been doing for 6 years.
For this team to be a really good team the goalie cannot be the only reason they can win.
Two player out of the line up, Pettersson and Demko and the team flounders worse than normal.
With just Demko starting off badly look at the remainder, they can't win in regulation time, they play to get to OT so they can get a point, they count on the PP to score.
What reason is there to keep any on this team as it is? How is another 2 years going to change this group of misfits.
I wonder if the Avs’ goaltending sinks their team in the playoffs this year, if they’d be interested in a Demko trade (at least he’s somewhat cost controlled). Assuming Demko returns to form beforehand, would be great if we could get a Byram type return. Probably wishful thinking on my behalf.Would our owner allow a futures return for Demko? Wouldn’t the return have to be a young NHL player? Love to get the rebuild started with high picks, but don’t see our owner allowing that direction.
Demko and Bo at the TDL for Byram, Newhook, and cap?I wonder if the Avs’ goaltending sinks their team in the playoffs this year, if they’d be interested in a Demko trade (at least he’s somewhat cost controlled). Assuming Demko returns to form beforehand, would be great if we could get a Byram type return. Probably wishful thinking on my behalf.
I think Colorado is fine with Georgiev in net.Demko and Bo at the TDL for Byram, Newhook, and cap?
I’m bracing myself for a mediocre return for Horvat to temper expectations. It’s going to be something like Roslovic, Peeke/Ceulemans, and a 2nd.
I am concerned about that as well, but I figured Horvat is done here as he’s tired of losing (has said so in previous interviews) along with alleged issues in the locker room. I think he might be ready to move on despite competitive offers being given to him.I have a different concern here. I feel like the Canucks will take one last run and pony up an 8x8 or 8x9 offer to him which he accepts, only for him to revert to his career average of being a 25-30 goal, 55-65 point center - which while no bad thing, isn’t worth $8 or $9M a season.
I do think this hot streak of goals will come to an end. He’s always been a streaky scorer. The time to sign him to a reasonable extension was in the summer, and the price is too high now.
Just my opinion.
Although I also agree, the trade market is going to be very underwhelming here.
I’m bracing myself for a mediocre return for Horvat to temper expectations. It’s going to be something like Roslovic, Peeke/Ceulemans, and a 2nd.
I have a different concern here. I feel like the Canucks will take one last run and pony up an 8x8 or 8x9 offer to him which he accepts, only for him to revert to his career average of being a 25-30 goal, 55-65 point center - which while no bad thing, isn’t worth $8 or $9M a season.
I do think this hot streak of goals will come to an end. He’s always been a streaky scorer. The time to sign him to a reasonable extension was in the summer, and the price is too high now.
Just my opinion.
Although I also agree, the trade market is going to be very underwhelming here.
I’m bracing myself for a mediocre return for Horvat to temper expectations. It’s going to be something like Roslovic, Peeke/Ceulemans, and a 2nd.