mriswith
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2011
- 4,484
- 8,157
I think there's a big split in opinion between whether he's a #1 or whether he's just a Tyson Barrie on steroids where he puts up numbers but sucks so badly defensively that we'd be better off trading him, and the latter is not a #1 at all. If everyone agreed he's a #1 I don't think anyone would entertain trading him.What is the "narrative" on Hughes? I feel the "narrative" is that he is a #1 defenseman in the league.
And that's kind of why he's brought up in discussions, at least for me. I think if he is considered that #1 guy on a great contract, he should have immense value. And while it would suck losing him, if you could parlay him into say two #2 defensemen of a similar age with better two-way profiles then I think it might position the team a bit better in the future.
I think a huge factor in why he looks worse in comparison to a lot of other guys because he's had to carry a #6 or #7 as a partner against top competition since Tanev left.
For example I don't think his game got worse in his sophomore season, I think the gap between his rookie year and his sophomore year was entirely based on going from having a legitimate partner to having to learn how to play very differently in order to carry bottom pairing spare parts rather than his actual game deteriorating and it's a huge developmental loss that he had to waste so much development time learning this instead of improving his all around game.
It's like a lesser version of how Myers tanks every partner he gets paired with and always has. Every player has to sacrifice their game to accommodate his playstyle and every player immediately looks better when they get paired with literally anyone else.
Right now Hughes suffers a gap in perception because he has to carry partners that really don't belong in the role they're put in. Give him a Toews, Samuelsson, Tanev or prime Cernak and perception of his defense and two way play would change dramatically. Give Makar, Dahlin, Hedman etc a Schenn-tier partner for a few years and watch perception of them as players drop. He has his flaws as a player but I think they are exacerbated by what he's been given to work with and would be minimized with an equivalent partner to what the other Norris calibre dmen in the league get.
Relevant to your trade idea, I think that if we had an actual #2 for him then I don't think anyone would be willing to trade him for two #2's.