OT: Failure of a team, Failure of a rebuild

bicboi64

Registered User
Aug 13, 2020
5,354
3,479
Brampton
there are Sens fans who are like 10-12 years old that think this team is just the crappiest thing to ever exist, have never seen success and have only seen incompetence
I turned 30 last year and feel old af. It's been so long lol since I've seen the Sens not be utter shite.
 

AchtzehnBaby

Global Matador
Mar 28, 2013
15,487
9,346
Hazeldean Road
How come you never posted any records under DJ Smith or Dorion?

The only thing I've seen you post that was remotely similar was point percentage at the beginning of the season like you were trying to make a point that they were doing well or something.
I think it is because of the chumps that spent 6 months bitching about it is all DJ, and now that the JM train is falling off the tracks it's obvious it wasn't
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Senscore

Boud

Registered User
Dec 27, 2011
13,858
7,457
One thing that worries me that no one really talks about is how little difference the coaching change made in the overall team play. I don't mean wins and losses or goaltending, I mean how the team plays, breakdowns, structure.

This team has clearly given up and I'm not sure how they get motivated coming into next season if the energy from the offseason changes didn't work for them this season. I'm not confident in this group at all if they can't even be committed to playing better hockey under a new coach. To the contrary, I think the players kind of gave up when Martin took over initially and you could clearly see they didn't like him as much as DJ. You can see the players have been referencing to Martin as a much "different personality". While he is a different personality I'm sure, who gives a f*** about his personality? The guy has a Stanley Cup ring behind the bench and the goal here is to win at all cost.

I think one of the big issues is actually the character in the room. When you're in 27th place and a 36 year old cares more about winning and scoring when games are close than your "core players", you are in deep deep trouble. I really have no belief in this group. If everyone worked as hard as Giroux does this team would be in the playoffs but you can't teach that.

Stutzle is immature in his play. Norris is injured all the time. Batherson is playing half the time. Tkachuk is not good defensively and effort is often not there. Chychrun looks like Mike Reilly.

This is a big part of the "core". Won't go far with that no matter who's the coach. The only guys who have taken steps with Martin under the bench are Chabot and the 4rth liners. That's it.

People are fooling themselves in thinking that goaltending is the main issue. It's not. It's one of the issues. The fact that this team has not tightened up under a new coach and has made no improvements is a major red flag.
 
Last edited:

Answer

Registered User
Dec 17, 2006
7,023
1,470
Edmonton
No, only a Sens fan can hate their own team as much as he does.

No Fan hates their own Team. It's called criticism when your team is continuously losing for a good half decade

You clearly have no seen Soccer or Cricket Fan, or even fans from NBA and NFL

Cricket players have received legitimate death threats for losing tournaments and have their homes vandalized, harassed at public places while being there with their little kids
 

Adrianopolous

Registered User
Oct 5, 2017
4,580
3,912
Delray Beach, Florida
One thing that worries me that no one really talks about is how little difference the coaching change made in the overall team play. I don't mean wins and losses or goaltending, I mean how the team plays, breakdowns, structure.

This team has clearly given up and I'm not sure how they get motivated coming into next season if the energy from the offseason changes didn't work for them this season. I'm not confident in this group at all if they can't even be committed to playing better hockey under a new coach. To the contrary, I think the players kind of gave up when Martin took over initially and you could clearly see they didn't like him as much as DJ. You can see the players have been referencing to Martin as a much "different personality". While he is a different personality I'm sure, who gives a f*** about his personality? The guy has a Stanley Cup ring behind the bench and the goal here is to win at all cost.

I think one of the big issues is actually the character in the room. When you're in 27th place and a 36 year old cares more about winning and scoring when games are close than your "core players", you are in deep deep trouble. I really have no belief in this group. If everyone worked as hard as Giroux does this team would be in the playoffs but you can't teach that.

Stutzle is immature in his play. Norris is injured all the time. Batherson is playing half the time. Tkachuk is not good defensively and effort is often not there. Chychrun looks like Mike Reilly.

This is a big part of the "core". Won't go far with that no matter who's the coach. The only guys who have taken steps with Martin under the bench are Chabot and the 4rth liners. That's it.
This is the elephant in the room that folks are not addressing I agree with you
 

StoicSensFan

ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ
Feb 6, 2014
4,397
5,095
No Fan hates their own Team. It's called criticism when your team is continuously losing for a good half decade

You clearly have no seen Soccer or Cricket Fan, or even fans from NBA and NFL

Cricket players have received legitimate death threats for losing tournaments and have their homes vandalized, harassed at public places while being there with their little kids
I've hated this team at times in the last 20 years, so I guess I'm not really a fan?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jhutter

Answer

Registered User
Dec 17, 2006
7,023
1,470
Edmonton
I've hated this team at times in the last 20 years, so I guess I'm not really a fan?

You don't hate the Team in its true essence of its meaning where you don't wish anything good upon it and take satisfaction in it's failures

What you feel is more inline with being upset or disgusted by the results and how the Team is performing, or even how the Team is even constructed, because you want it to be better! So I guess that does make you fan
 

PoutineSp00nZ

Electricity is really just organized lightning.
Jul 21, 2009
20,342
6,016
Ottawa
Any of those top 5 draft projections reeady to step into the lineup?

Maybe getting lucky with the lottery for once, bringing in a quality rookie, making a significant trade, and signing a decent free agent can all be done to revamp this team in one offseason.

Probably a tad optimistic lol
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,850
7,825
Undeniable the rebuild of the RD was a failure. JBD and Thomson didn’t turn into top 6 Dman - I think we even had modest expectations of Demelo/Hamonic type of dman who can just play in the NHL z and be stable - and it’s cost us massively.

Of course rebuilding the goaltending is / was a complete disaster.
 

Tuna99

Registered User
Sep 26, 2009
15,850
7,825
One thing that worries me that no one really talks about is how little difference the coaching change made in the overall team play. I don't mean wins and losses or goaltending, I mean how the team plays, breakdowns, structure.

This team has clearly given up and I'm not sure how they get motivated coming into next season if the energy from the offseason changes didn't work for them this season. I'm not confident in this group at all if they can't even be committed to playing better hockey under a new coach. To the contrary, I think the players kind of gave up when Martin took over initially and you could clearly see they didn't like him as much as DJ. You can see the players have been referencing to Martin as a much "different personality". While he is a different personality I'm sure, who gives a f*** about his personality? The guy has a Stanley Cup ring behind the bench and the goal here is to win at all cost.

I think one of the big issues is actually the character in the room. When you're in 27th place and a 36 year old cares more about winning and scoring when games are close than your "core players", you are in deep deep trouble. I really have no belief in this group. If everyone worked as hard as Giroux does this team would be in the playoffs but you can't teach that.

Stutzle is immature in his play. Norris is injured all the time. Batherson is playing half the time. Tkachuk is not good defensively and effort is often not there. Chychrun looks like Mike Reilly.

This is a big part of the "core". Won't go far with that no matter who's the coach. The only guys who have taken steps with Martin under the bench are Chabot and the 4rth liners. That's it.

People are fooling themselves in thinking that goaltending is the main issue. It's not. It's one of the issues. The fact that this team has not tightened up under a new coach and has made no improvements is a major red flag.

Disagree- when I see rhem
Play they have reduced shots against. They control the O zone way better and of course the neutral zone is way better. It’s not all on The goalies of course but they suck - if you have a coach who gets his Damn into the right spot on the ice but the Dman doesn’t take the stick of the body and is just in the right spot doing nothing else - that’s not coaching it’s the players

For sure Ottawa needs to add stable solid players who can at least contest pucks in the high danger scoring areas and at best keep those pucks and players to the outside and a goalie who can make NHL saves across his entire net we will improve dramatically.

I think we are closer then people think. These games they look good in a lot of the game and with a few right moves they can really make their structure way more air tight

I see a team really doing well to keep structure. Once they eliminate the players that allow all the leaks and dreakdowns they are going to improve by leaps not baby steps
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,079
13,480
One thing that worries me that no one really talks about is how little difference the coaching change made in the overall team play. I don't mean wins and losses or goaltending, I mean how the team plays, breakdowns, structure.

This team has clearly given up and I'm not sure how they get motivated coming into next season if the energy from the offseason changes didn't work for them this season. I'm not confident in this group at all if they can't even be committed to playing better hockey under a new coach. To the contrary, I think the players kind of gave up when Martin took over initially and you could clearly see they didn't like him as much as DJ. You can see the players have been referencing to Martin as a much "different personality". While he is a different personality I'm sure, who gives a f*** about his personality? The guy has a Stanley Cup ring behind the bench and the goal here is to win at all cost.

I think one of the big issues is actually the character in the room. When you're in 27th place and a 36 year old cares more about winning and scoring when games are close than your "core players", you are in deep deep trouble. I really have no belief in this group. If everyone worked as hard as Giroux does this team would be in the playoffs but you can't teach that.

Stutzle is immature in his play. Norris is injured all the time. Batherson is playing half the time. Tkachuk is not good defensively and effort is often not there. Chychrun looks like Mike Reilly.

This is a big part of the "core". Won't go far with that no matter who's the coach. The only guys who have taken steps with Martin under the bench are Chabot and the 4rth liners. That's it.

People are fooling themselves in thinking that goaltending is the main issue. It's not. It's one of the issues. The fact that this team has not tightened up under a new coach and has made no improvements is a major red flag.
Disagree, they have played better defensively under JM.
 

Tnuoc Alucard

🇨🇦🔑🧲✈️🎲🥅🎱🍟🥨🌗
Sep 23, 2015
8,307
1,979
One thing that worries me that no one really talks about is how little difference the coaching change made in the overall team play. I don't mean wins and losses or goaltending, I mean how the team plays, breakdowns, structure.

This team has clearly given up and I'm not sure how they get motivated coming into next season if the energy from the offseason changes didn't work for them this season. I'm not confident in this group at all if they can't even be committed to playing better hockey under a new coach. To the contrary, I think the players kind of gave up when Martin took over initially and you could clearly see they didn't like him as much as DJ. You can see the players have been referencing to Martin as a much "different personality". While he is a different personality I'm sure, who gives a f*** about his personality? The guy has a Stanley Cup ring behind the bench and the goal here is to win at all cost.

I think one of the big issues is actually the character in the room. When you're in 27th place and a 36 year old cares more about winning and scoring when games are close than your "core players", you are in deep deep trouble. I really have no belief in this group. If everyone worked as hard as Giroux does this team would be in the playoffs but you can't teach that.

Stutzle is immature in his play. Norris is injured all the time. Batherson is playing half the time. Tkachuk is not good defensively and effort is often not there. Chychrun looks like Mike Reilly.

This is a big part of the "core". Won't go far with that no matter who's the coach. The only guys who have taken steps with Martin under the bench are Chabot and the 4rth liners. That's it.

People are fooling themselves in thinking that goaltending is the main issue. It's not. It's one of the issues. The fact that this team has not tightened up under a new coach and has made no improvements is a major red flag.


Excellent “Take”… totally agree that J Martin has failed to move the needle, and most of the players have NOT responded as professionals, expect the exceptions you pointed out.

The majority of posters seem to have a warm and fuzzy nostalgic feeling for J Martin, and can’t seem to separate that from his current stint behind the bench…. And are cutting him way too much slack, and along with the rookie GM, have thrown in their towels for this season a month or two ago.

Constantly looking backwards and assigning blame, to allow a “pass” for the last 57 games of the season to be wasted, and not hold the current management and coaching staff accountable, is not serving this franchise well….. and will be a huge setback come training camp.

I still maintain that the rookie GM should have hired someone like Berube, as head coach, no substitute teacher, and should have begun the hard lifting back in mid December with 57 games left to go…. Instead of kicking the can down the road to September…. Waste of time.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,641
10,553
Montreal, Canada
It was to be expected but I always underestimate bad faith arguments. Of course some posters with an agenda were going to count the coaching change record since day 1, like if it was REALISTIC that Martin/Alfredsson could have fixed everything overnight.

Personally, I have seen clear improvement in the way they play. It's partial, it's not always consistent and sometimes they crawl back to bad habits and fall apart but it's been there and it has been reflected in advanced stats after an adjustment period. Sens have had the 3rd lowest expected goals against ratio in the league since mid January.

Goaltending has been even worse though, Norris has been shut down, Tarasenko is gone and they have nothing to play for (Giroux is kinda mailing it in). They might still be far from being a contender but many things have been trending in the right direction, which is something Jacques Martin has been talking about himself too.

Interesting how I called it the Darkest Hour in 2018, but it's now more like the Darkest 7 Years since then:


2024 - 2018 = 6 years

If you count the 2017-18 when things fell apart, it's the 7th season but only 6 years still.
 
Last edited:

jbeck5

Registered User
Jan 26, 2009
16,793
3,654
This is the elephant in the room that folks are not addressing I agree with you

I try to talk about it all the time.

Goaltending is crap, but there's a lot of other issues with this team that no one talks about.

This team has a lot more holes than people are willing to admit.

It why I often question if we even have the organizational asset capital to win in the next few years.

We may need to sell a bunch of assets off and recover prospects and picks and try again with a better strategy and foundation and not buy useless players prematurely like debrincat and chychrun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CDN24 and Alex1234

jbeck5

Registered User
Jan 26, 2009
16,793
3,654
Disagree- when I see rhem
Play they have reduced shots against. They control the O zone way better and of course the neutral zone is way better. It’s not all on The goalies of course but they suck - if you have a coach who gets his Damn into the right spot on the ice but the Dman doesn’t take the stick of the body and is just in the right spot doing nothing else - that’s not coaching it’s the players

For sure Ottawa needs to add stable solid players who can at least contest pucks in the high danger scoring areas and at best keep those pucks and players to the outside and a goalie who can make NHL saves across his entire net we will improve dramatically.

I think we are closer then people think. These games they look good in a lot of the game and with a few right moves they can really make their structure way more air tight

I see a team really doing well to keep structure. Once they eliminate the players that allow all the leaks and dreakdowns they are going to improve by leaps not baby steps

The problem is half the team allow all the leaks and breakdowns.

I think we have at least 6 moves needed...which is a lot.

I'd add 2 RHD, 3 two way forwards who are gritty, and add a solid goalie.

6 moves means we're still pretty far away.

We probably make half the moves required this year and hopefully half next year.


But this to make the playoffs. Does this team have the capital to win a cup with this core? If not, why waste our time.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad