Clearly the best prospect in liiga this year.
Also hard to disagree when you remember what Slafkovsky did at the Olympics.Kinda hard to agree when you remember what Kemell did in Autumn.
Kemell has better numbers sure. He have also been best player in liiga for draft eligible players, but his utilization is different compared to Slaf. I’m talking about projection, not where they are now. Slaf is much more raw player compared to Kemell and at their best is clearly more dominant player. Kemell despite of his young age is really mature for his age mentally and physically. Yes, of course he is still going to mature, but he is closer to his ceiling IMO and i believe it is knock on Kemell. I’m afraid there is not much room for improvement. I have been wrong before, but to me Slaf is clearly best prospect on liiga because of his projection. I’m finnish and i don’t have horse in this race.Kinda hard to agree when you remember what Kemell did in Autumn.
Also hard to disagree when you remember what Slafkovsky did at the Olympics.
Devils won’t be interested in trading him .Can't wait for Slafkovsky to be a Hab.
You won’t get the chance to trade him if we draft him firstDevils won’t be interested in trading him .
MSL will have the Habs win at a .750 clip and Devils continue to suck and finish one point behind you , draft Slaf . We will let you draft a CYou won’t get the chance to trade him if we draft him first
Probably not a bad comp.He reminds me so much of Andrei Svechnikov.
It's a good comparison?
Weren't Svech, Rantanen and Puljujarvi all quicker than Slafkovsky? I haven't seen much of Slafkovsky but in my limited viewing, he seemed more like a puck protection beast on the O-zone cycle. Less of a quick strike speedy winger.
Rantanen was definitely not quicker than Slaf.Weren't Svech, Rantanen and Puljujarvi all quicker than Slafkovsky? I haven't seen much of Slafkovsky but in my limited viewing, he seemed more like a puck protection beast on the O-zone cycle. Less of a quick strike speedy winger.
You’re right. Puljujärvi is more explosive and they share similar top speed, but Pulju isn’t a tank like Slaf. Yes, a big strong dude for sure but Slaf has ridiculous strength for player of his age and he can handle the puck in top speed. Barkov now is a good comparison for skating and strength. Physical beast with excellent/elite skating.Rantanen was definitely not quicker than Slaf.
He’s gotta keep the energy going from the Olympics. He better not slack offsky.
Still looks like low hockey IQ to me.
I just ignore certain posters after the Kaako/Hughes discussion. You are correct, he has tremendous hockey sense.His hockey IQ is one of his biggest assets...