That honestly would be incredible.Imagine he leads slovaks to medal. He would be a Slovak legend before even being drafted to NHL
i'm praying he falls to the isles. Ziggy Palffy 2.0
If you want Palffy 2.0, pray for Filip Mesar. That is his clone.
Slafkovsky is something between Jagr and Hossa.
Everything is what the player is actually capable of not how consistent they are as a teenager. Does he have an elite enough of a skillset to translate to impact play in the NHL. His projected peak is what matters at 17 years old. You're trying to project if he can be elite in the NHL. This guys got it, highest potential in the draft. Of course we want to see more consistency but compared to his counter parts no one has a higher ceiling. He is guaranteed to go top 3.He has fantastic potential, but he needs to continue this into league play. You can get on a hot streak in these short tournaments, but consistency is everything. He's definitely got an enticing mix of size and skill though.
Everything is what the player is actually capable of not how consistent they are as a teenager. Does he have an elite enough of a skillset to translate to impact play in the NHL. His projected peak is what matters at 17 years old. You're trying to project if he can be elite in the NHL. This guys got it, highest potential in the draft. Of course we want to see more consistency but compared to his counter parts no one has a higher ceiling. He is guaranteed to go top 3.
Don't think this is true. I love him as a prospect but a guy like Savoie, or even Wright may have a higher ceiling. He's also not a guarentee at all to go top 3. Most lists have the top-3 consisting of some combiniation of Wright and Cooley/Savoie/Kemell/Nemec but Slafkovsky is definitely right there with them with recent play.Of course we want to see more consistency but compared to his counter parts no one has a higher ceiling. He is guaranteed to go top 3.
From a physical stand point I dont see how Wright or Savoie touch him. He is bigger, faster, stronger and flat out more impressive. Savoie is a very small player and Wright doesnt have close to his explosiveness. A team will value what he has to offer more than internet lists in my opinion. I predicted Seider would go in the top 10, its the same kind of situation. But for him I believe he will go top 3. Teams value raw talent, size and the ability to be effective against men as teenagers. It was obvious the first game I watched him at the WJC. He is a unique player in a draft that lacks raw high end talentDon't think this is true. I love him as a prospect but a guy like Savoie, or even Wright may have a higher ceiling. He's also not a guarentee at all to go top 3. Most lists have the top-3 consisting of some combiniation of Wright and Cooley/Savoie/Kemell/Nemec but Slafkovsky is definitely right there with them with recent play.
Were looking for completely different things in prospects when we evaluate. It was obvious at the WJC too and he didnt have the production, the way he moves along with his puck skills for a 17 year old that is 6'3 simply doesnt come along very often. This hockey is really good its the best barometer to evaluate any of the draft eligibles. All you have to do is watch Canadas games in both tournaments. Mactavish and Power looked like men against boys in the WJC out here they are average and do not stand out. Its much faster hockey to the naked eye.This always feels like a weird trap to me because I think I value that consistency over projecting a ceiling. Depends on what we're talking about as consistency as well.
Best example I can think of off the top of my head would be Laine vs Tkachuk in their draft. At the time almost everyone would say Laine > Tkachuk because his ceiling is so much higher but if you asked now, a lot of people would take the consistency Tkachuk provides > the up n down Patrik Laine and his elite ceiling.
Personally I have trouble really taking anything from the Olympics seriously considering all these teams were thrown together with little to no preparation. I'd rather judge an entire body of work in a top Euro league. And with Slafkovsky it's one of those weird situations where I see a player in Liiga and actually like him but then I see where people are projecting him and I say "Oh really that high? Ok good luck"
"here are two choices, you can have something really good, or something EVEN BETTER"If you want Palffy 2.0, pray for Filip Mesar. That is his clone.
Slafkovsky is something between Jagr and Hossa.
Comparable to Rantanen at the same age?
Can you share an example or two that suggests he has high hockey IQ?It's simply ridiculous what he is doing at this tournament. His IQ is trough the roof and skates very well too
If you an find a copy of his games from the WJC you will see his processing and passing ability on display.Can you share an example or two that suggests he has high hockey IQ?
I haven't seen him play yet.
With players that have all the tools, like he does, it's easy to assume the hockey IQ isn't on the same level (because if it was, they might be more dominant).
Everything is what the player is actually capable of not how consistent they are as a teenager. Does he have an elite enough of a skillset to translate to impact play in the NHL. His projected peak is what matters at 17 years old. You're trying to project if he can be elite in the NHL. This guys got it, highest potential in the draft. Of course we want to see more consistency but compared to his counter parts no one has a higher ceiling. He is guaranteed to go top 3.
Can you share an example or two that suggests he has high hockey IQ?
I haven't seen him play yet.
With players that have all the tools, like he does, it's easy to assume the hockey IQ isn't on the same level (because if it was, they might be more dominant).
we shall seeHow does he compare to Kakko as a prospect?
Because he has been suspended for a while.Why doesn’t he produce in Liiga?
Why doesn’t he produce in Liiga?