F Ivan Demidov - SKA St. Petersburg, KHL (2024, 5th, MTL)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Baksfamous112

Registered User
Jul 21, 2016
8,113
5,436
There's no need for retrospection. Everyone knew Michkov was a better prospect than Reinbacher at the time.

They should have taken Michkov and Demidov. Draft BPA that high in the draft.
Yeah but then Montreal would have a huge freaking hole at RHD and a top pairing RHD is the hardest position to fill with 1C, so yeah, I’m ok with Montreal taking a swing at a potential top pairing RHD over yet another winger
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
34,879
32,949
That’s such a dumb reason to pass on a player it just makes no sense
Yeah, but didn't Lapointe or someone come out and say that was a factor?

Yeah but then Montreal would have a huge freaking hole at RHD and a top pairing RHD is the hardest position to fill with 1C, so yeah, I’m ok with Montreal taking a swing at a potential top pairing RHD over yet another winger
It's a lot easier to find a Reinbacher caliber player in the 2nd/3rd round than it is to find a Michkov.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Subban signed e5

Baksfamous112

Registered User
Jul 21, 2016
8,113
5,436
Yeah, but didn't Lapointe or someone come out and say that was a factor?


It's a lot easier to find a Reinbacher caliber player in the 2nd/3rd round than it is to find a Michkov.
Lmao sure yeah just like it’s easier to find a Nemec in the 2nd/3rd round than it is to find a Michkov.

Breaking news: It is not
 

Frank Drebin

He's just a child
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,245
22,695
Edmonton
Yeah, but didn't Lapointe or someone come out and say that was a factor?
Lapointe was asked if the Russian/contract issue was a factor and while he did say yes I got the impression that there were a few things about Michkov that Montreal didn't like.

Never said that they were right, but the contract thing just never made sense.

Reinbacher played all of last year in Europe and likely won't be a full timer till 25-26. Was that extra year that important to the habs that they were willing to pass over what they felt was the better player because of it?

I don't think Montreal had eyes on Michkov for a long time before the draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MoneyManny

Boss Man Hughes

Registered User
Mar 15, 2022
16,102
11,153
If Montreal knew Michkov would come over in his D+2 season I think they would have taken him. And after seeing him torch the league in preseason, they definitely take him.
Again this is crap. It had nothing to do with his contract. A combination of not liking his character and feeling Reinbacher was the more valuable asset were the liklely reasons.

Wow habs fans are still trying to convince anyone that reinbacher > michkov :laugh:
Reinbacher is likley the more valuable player if he can stay health but that is irrelevant. They presumably felt Michkov was a selfish player. Even if Michkov is putting up big points he may be a loser (like Huberdeau for example).
 

AvatarAang

Registered User
Jan 21, 2018
2,443
4,854
Reinbacher is likley the more valuable player if he can stay health but that is irrelevant. They presumably felt Michkov was a selfish player. Even if Michkov is putting up big points he may be a loser (like Huberdeau for example).

Wow now habs fans are making up imaginary scenarios. You think reinbacher > michkov because there’s a chance that michkov is a loser? 🤣🤣🤣

dumb-and-dumber-lloyd.gif
 

MoneyManny

Registered User
Jun 28, 2021
866
1,313
Yeah I mean if you look back 2-3 years after a draft you can definitely find players that were picked later that you would have preferred instead of your pick but looking back two years ago, I still think Reinbacher was the right choice. Even now, he looked pretty decent against NHLer at 19 years old. It’s unfortunate he got injured but Montreal needed (and still need) to hit on a high-end RHD and Reinbacher is the only one in the pool that has the ability to fill that need.

You could argue that Montreal could have taken Michkov and then a D but again, Silayev, Dickinson and Buium are all LHD (we have no need for one) and Yakemchuk is redundant. We don’t necessarily have a need for a pure offensive minded D and to be honest, I prefer Demidov over Michkov


I’m sorry you regret not drafting Michkov but I personally don’t and it has nothing to do with cope. I’m not talking for all habs fan and perhaps you should do the same
Drafting solely by what the big club needs AT THE TIME OF THE DRAFT is a truly horrible doctrine and will often result in Kotkaniemis, Reinbachers, and lengthy rebuilds.

If we drafted Michkov instead and had absolutely no need for him, then right about now we could trade him for 3 Reinbachers.
 
Feb 19, 2003
67,210
25,561
Concord, New Hampshire
Wow now habs fans are making up imaginary scenarios. You think reinbacher > michkov because there’s a chance that michkov is a loser? 🤣🤣🤣

dumb-and-dumber-lloyd.gif
Consider the source of the comment

Drafting solely by what the big club needs AT THE TIME OF THE DRAFT is a truly horrible doctrine and will often result in Kotkaniemis, Reinbachers, and lengthy rebuilds.

If we drafted Michkov instead and had absolutely no need for him, then right about now we could trade him for 3 Reinbachers.
No need for a player of Michkov’s caliber.
Hilarious
 

Baksfamous112

Registered User
Jul 21, 2016
8,113
5,436
Wow habs fans are still trying to convince anyone that reinbacher > michkov :laugh:
I genuinely could not care less if Michkov becomes a star just like you probably don’t give a flying duck if Boldy become a 90 points player and the guy you drafted over him is playing for another team.

Just because I still like Reinbacher and still think he has top pairing potential doesn’t mean I think he’s better than Michkov as a player. He is a bigger need though
 

Baksfamous112

Registered User
Jul 21, 2016
8,113
5,436
Yes, it is. Heck, we found Casey in the 2nd round in the same draft as Nemec and he looks like he may surpass Simon this year.
That’s a very bold statement but you do you. I hope you can at least understand why your team went for Nemec instead of the more talented player in Cooley.

I’m not sure why it is so hard to understand for some people that team needs at key positions can make or break a contending team
 

WhiskeyYerTheDevils

yer leadin me astray
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2005
34,879
32,949
That’s a very bold statement but you do you. I hope you can at least understand why your team went for Nemec instead of the more talented player in Cooley.
Nemec wasn't really seen as inferior to Cooley in the consensus, though I would have preferred Cooley myself.
I’m not sure why it is so hard to understand for some people that team needs at key positions can make or break a contending team
If you're picking that high, you need to be picking BPA. If there are two players who you see as roughly equivalent, then pick for position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fledgemyhedge

Baksfamous112

Registered User
Jul 21, 2016
8,113
5,436
Nemec wasn't really seen as inferior to Cooley in the consensus, though I would have preferred Cooley myself.

If you're picking that high, you need to be picking BPA. If there are two players who you see as roughly equivalent, then pick for position.
Montreal brass said over and over again that they thought Reinbacher was the BPA at 5.

It’s easy to say after the facts, although it’s still early in both players career. I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Reinbacher can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Michkov considering Montreal current strength and weaknesses
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WhiskeyYerTheDevils

dgibb10

Registered User
Feb 29, 2024
2,727
2,385
Montreal brass said over and over again that they thought Reinbacher was the BPA at 5.

It’s easy to say after the facts, although it’s still early in both players career. I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Reinbacher can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Michkov considering Montreal current strength and weaknesses

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Silayev can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering NJD current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Dickinson can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering SJS current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Lindstrom can become a steady two-way force and play 20 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering CBJ current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Nemec can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering NJD current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Mintyukov can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering ANA current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Jiricek can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering CBJ current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Alex Vlasic can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Caufield considering CHI current strength and weaknesses.

Just want to make sure these same arguments hold when the flashy, high point player is on MTL (Hutson, Caufield, Demidov, etc) and the less flashy, 2 way player is on another team?
 

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,358
6,197
I think superstar will be a stretch for Carlsson's potential but I agree with the sentiment.
I don’t. And I don’t think many teams do either, even after Michkov’s impressive preseason.

Carlsson’s potential is in the mold of players like Sundin, Kopitar, and Barkov. I take that over a small scoring winger every time.

Maybe things go awry and he doesn’t hit that potential, but you have to take the chance for that kind of player - they’re virtually impossible to acquire outside of drafting them.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Silayev can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering NJD current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Dickinson can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering SJS current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Lindstrom can become a steady two-way force and play 20 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering CBJ current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Nemec can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering NJD current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Mintyukov can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering ANA current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Jiricek can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering CBJ current strength and weaknesses.

I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Alex Vlasic can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Caufield considering CHI current strength and weaknesses.

Just want to make sure these same arguments hold when the flashy, high point player is on MTL (Hutson, Caufield, Demidov, etc) and the less flashy, 2 way player is on another team?
Jesus Christ, you ok?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frank Drebin

jfhabs

Registered User
May 21, 2015
5,109
2,566
Probably?

Michkov-Dach-Demidov
Slafkovsky-Suzuki-Caufield

That top 6 would be ridiculous. And either Michkov/Demidov can also realistically play C. That would move Dach to the 3rd line which could create a whole host of mismatches.
In hindsight I would almost prefer having a guy like Leonard if we're going to fantasize about playoff success.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad