Montreal brass said over and over again that they thought Reinbacher was the BPA at 5.
It’s easy to say after the facts, although it’s still early in both players career. I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Reinbacher can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Michkov considering Montreal current strength and weaknesses
I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Silayev can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering NJD current strength and weaknesses.
I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Dickinson can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering SJS current strength and weaknesses.
I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Lindstrom can become a steady two-way force and play 20 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Demidov considering CBJ current strength and weaknesses.
I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Nemec can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering NJD current strength and weaknesses.
I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Mintyukov can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering ANA current strength and weaknesses.
I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Jiricek can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Slafkofsky considering CBJ current strength and weaknesses.
I personally don’t care too much if one player is more skilled/flashy than the other. If Alex Vlasic can become a steady two-way force and play 20-25 hard minutes a night, I’ll take that over a 90-95 points Caufield considering CHI current strength and weaknesses.
Just want to make sure these same arguments hold when the flashy, high point player is on MTL (Hutson, Caufield, Demidov, etc) and the less flashy, 2 way player is on another team?