UrbanImpact
Registered User
- Apr 12, 2021
- 4,389
- 6,743
I'm noticing this seems to be a fairly common response you have. Rather than engage, bring in new points, and respond accordingly, you post an attempt at a dismissive zinger.Weren't you in the Bedard thread saying WJC is pretty meaningless when trying to put down Bedard?
I'm just simply asking a question as to why the WJC championship matters here but not regarding Bedard. I've noticed that posters seems to pick and chose when a certain argument or stat matters or not.I'm noticing this seems to be a fairly common response you have. Rather than engage, bring in new points, and respond accordingly, you post an attempt at a dismissive zinger.
You aren't adding anything to these conversations.
Whoever brought up that Taylor Hall comparison I wholeheartedly agree.
Can’t stop seeing it watching him play.
It's weird that a hart winner has a slightly negative connotation, but that's how it feels.Whoever brought up that Taylor Hall comparison I wholeheartedly agree.
Can’t stop seeing it watching him play.
Not at all.It's weird that a hart winner has a slightly negative connotation, but that's how it feels.
Hes back up to 2 points per game. A truly incredible pace, a feat not done by a draft eligible NCAA player since Kariya.
I have those concerns, but I do agree that they are overblown. I see Bedard, Michkov and Fantilli as the easy top 3, and any of them is a 1OA talent in many drafts. Carlsson is great, but the offensive upside isn't in their tier.this guy has become criminally underrated on HF. Definitely a high 1st overall pick in most other drafts with his size, skating and offensive toolkit package. Lack of IQ is getting blown out of proportion a bit because of a few poor games at the world juniors (even though he was one of the younger players at the tournament).
Michkov looks to be pure offense and if he can fix the flaws in his game, he can be a high end offensive franchise winger. Fantilli is the more complete player, he can just do it all. Easily the number one pick in the past several drafts with the exception of Dahlin and maybe Jack Hughes2 and 3 is a good debate. Both players are practically polar opposites, and both have been scoring at a historic rate in their leagues. The easy choice is Fantilli for a GM, for many reasons, but I like the way Michkov manipulates the game better. Both amazing talents.
Michkov will never have the 200 foot game that Fantilli has, but his hockey sense and poise with the puck is something that can't be taught. The best scorers in the world have that trait, and that's my only concern with Fantilli. I see every tool in the world, but his ability to dictate pace and slow the game down is not there.Michkov looks to be pure offense and if he can fix the flaws in his game, he can be a high end offensive franchise winger. Fantilli is the more complete player, he can just do it all. Easily the number one pick in the past several drafts with the exception of Dahlin and maybe Jack Hughes
Michkov will never have the 200 foot game that Fantilli has, but his hockey sense and poise with the puck is something that can't be taught. The best scorers in the world have that trait, and that's my only concern with Fantilli. I see every tool in the world, but his ability to dictate pace and slow the game down is not there.
He reminds me of Svechnikov in that way. Every tool is high end, but the game never looks slow for him
Alright. Let's include those players.Tracking draft year stats reeks a bit of cherry picking, since only late birthdays are relevant for that, pretty much. A far more comprehensive image could be gotten by tracking u19 statistics, which would include the entire birth year.
But yes, if the goal is to compare late birthdays to other late birthdays, that's fine. But I think that it'd be more useful to include players such as Jaden Schwartz and Clayton keller and Brock Boeser and, hey, Logan Cooley.
Since right now, this list is just "he's doing better than Eichel".