Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 56,984
- 34,764
I honestly don't recall seeing much if anything advertising this year's 50/50, anyone know how they were promoting it?That’s valid.
I honestly don't recall seeing much if anything advertising this year's 50/50, anyone know how they were promoting it?That’s valid.
I honestly don't recall seeing much if anything advertising this year's 50/50, anyone know how they were promoting it?
Not surprised that we'd be the lowest, we were for the majority of the season by far the worst team in the north, and pretty much out of playoff contention from the get go. That's going to hurt viewership and as a result 50/50 sales.I saw in game offers - so did others … they sold $2000 of tickets and often more each game.
Feels like it may have had the lowest participation of any of the CDN fan bases.
Not surprised that we'd be the lowest, we were for the majority of the season by far the worst team in the north, and pretty much out of playoff contention from the get go. That's going to hurt viewership and as a result 50/50 sales.
I vaguely recall the odd mention of 50/50, but can't think of any concerted effort to push it, maybe they did something with a Twitter feed that I don't follow (they certainly should have been blasting links to people that way, if not that's pretty damn sad excuse for marketing) or ads, idk... If you're going to sell 50/50s you basically need to be in your face, it's not something that can be successful selling passively.
So can we blame the guy in charge of the foundation or no?
Like it or not, his reputation over the last few years has hurt his reputation and that affects every everything he's trying to market.
Just because you don’t recall seeing anything doesn’t mean they didn’t market the program well. I saw lots of adds … I just never swiped my credit card. When you are bringing in $1000 a game in revenue how much money would you spend on marketing ? Television was where fans were watching the game and those adds would be costly.
The cable networks have to pay back all the money they pay the league for broadcasting rights.
You seem to be defending against an attack I didn't make. I said I didn't see anything, not they didn't do anything. I opined that the numbers were likely hurt because the team wasn't doing well and as a result in game ads likely had fewer viewers to entice.
Not sure what you are getting at with that last sentence... Do you mean "make back all the money"? Sure I guess. That's why I suggested they might have done a social media campaign that I just wasn't captured as part of their targetted blasts.
The reality is if our 50/50 sales were significantly worse than other teams, It's likely because significantly fewer people saw the ads or were aware of it. That might be because we were bad and had fewer fans watching, it might have been because of how we promoted it compared to other teams, or it may be a combination of both.
I never mentioned Melnyk, no spin, once again, you are defending attacks I didn't make. I assume Melnyk had little to nothing to do with the decisions on how to market the charity.No … your constantly spinning this as Melynk fault for some type of failed marketing or whatever.
If we didn’t support the program well enough the problem starts with Sens fans not swiping their credit card. We watch the games, we see the adds.
I never mentioned Melnyk, no spin, once again, you are defending attacks I didn't make. I assume Melnyk had little to nothing to do with the decisions on how to market the charity.
I also don't recall seeing anything to promote 50/50 sales. Definitely nothing on Twitter.Not surprised that we'd be the lowest, we were for the majority of the season by far the worst team in the north, and pretty much out of playoff contention from the get go. That's going to hurt viewership and as a result 50/50 sales.
I vaguely recall the odd mention of 50/50, but can't think of any concerted effort to push it, maybe they did something with a Twitter feed that I don't follow (they certainly should have been blasting links to people that way, if not that's pretty damn sad excuse for marketing) or ads, idk... If you're going to sell 50/50s you basically need to be in your face, it's not something that can be successful selling passively.
No, we're very well aware what and who the problem is. I mean, there is grocery list of issues surrounding Melnyk, even in matters that don't involve hockey. Its fairly easy to see the root of the problem. Always in the headlines for the wrong reasons, incidents that expand beyond Ottawa and the Senators. Its just the kind of pattern displayed by one who is always poining the finger at everyone else and never ever looks in the mirror. Our hero.Yes you did - when you criticize the org it stops at Melynk.
Time for fans to realize how poorly they support the Sens and start addressing the problem.
They tweeted it out all the time during or before games. So this isn’t correct.I also don't recall seeing anything to promote 50/50 sales. Definitely nothing on Twitter.
They must have at least have been putting it out on the main Senators twitter feed, it would be madness not to, but I don't tend to check out that feed.They tweeted it out all the time during or before games. So this isn’t correct.
Yes you did - when you criticize the org it stops at Melynk.
Time for fans to realize how poorly they support the Sens and start addressing the problem.
Not every criticism of what an org does is criticism of the owner, and asking about how they marketed a 50/50 isn't criticism. However they marketed it, I wasn't captured to any large degree. I'm curious to know why that is.
I also wonder how this year's online 50/50 sales compare to last year's online 50/50 sales.
I feel the same way.I feel a little guilt and shame as a fan that I didn’t buy any 50/50 tickets … under Covid I watched every single Sens game this past season from home. I probably should have at least bought a $100 pack or something…. Like $5 a home game.
A little more revenue from fans like us may have let them keep the lights on and accomplished some work and in the community.
No, we're very well aware what and who the problem is. I mean, there is grocery list of issues surrounding Melnyk, even in matters that don't involve hockey. Its fairly easy to see the root of the problem. Always in the headlines for the wrong reasons, incidents that expand beyond Ottawa and the Senators. Its just the kind of pattern displayed by one who is always poining the finger at everyone else and never ever looks in the mirror. Our hero.
How do you know people didn't support CHEO? Maybe they just chose more efficient donation avenues? 50/50s are not exactly a great way to get your money working towards helping a cause, if that's your end goal.Most are … we all know there are not a lot of executive pieces in the org.
There is so much resistance to fans accepting any blame. Ottawa has tonnes of money, especially when we had nothing to spend it on the past 16 months … it’s a shame more of us didn’t buy any tickets to help support CHEO or whatever. I sure did enjoy watching those games. It’s the least I could have done.
Chicago, Tampa, Nashville, and NYI had crappy owners too and their fan support was in the gutter.Feels like that a 2 way problem. Crappy owner, crappy fan base… both sides pointing the finger at each other.
I’m part of the fan base and I’m going to look at my own actions and stop pointing the finger at everyone else.
How do you know people didn't support CHEO? Maybe they just chose more efficient donation avenues? 50/50s are not exactly a great way to get your money working towards helping a cause, if that's your end goal.
You accuse me of criticizing Melnyk even when there is no criticism to speak of but yet you never seem to pass up on an opportunity to blame fans or call them cheap,
Chicago, Tampa, Nashville, and NYI had crappy owners too and their fan support was in the gutter.
I wonder what happened.
Except the Sens got higher regular-season revenues than both the Islanders and Bolts up until very recently, and that's with the Sens being below-average and Tampa being a perennial contender.I’d like a new owner too… recall NYI let Tavares walk. I think their are more owners interested in owning teams in NYI, Tampa, and ChicAgo than Ottberia.
Attracting ownership interest to Ottawa is every bit a challenging as attacking UFA’s to Ottawa.
It doesn’t help when you can’t even get your fan bases to buy any tickets or support a little charity.
Except the Sens got higher regular-season revenues than both the Islanders and Bolts until very recently.