Yeah but jbd had a pretty good couple gamesI’d be tempted to sit JBD instead of Klevin unless they are trying to ease Branny back with 3rd pair minutes.
What's the thought behind this? Genuinely curious.I’d be tempted to sit JBD instead of Klevin unless they are trying to ease Branny back with 3rd pair minutes.
This lineup posted keeps everyone on their natural sides. Otherwise I would play Kleven ahead as well just because I'd like to give him the reps. I think he has the bigger future here but I can see why they are going this way at this juncture.I’d be tempted to sit JBD instead of Klevin unless they are trying to ease Branny back with 3rd pair minutes.
At this point I think Brannstrom brings more to the table playing with Chychrun than JBD.What's the thought behind this? Genuinely curious.
Don’t like him long term, but right now he’s starting to look more comfortable dealing with the NHL pace.Yeah but jbd had a pretty good couple games
Did he? He’s been brutal from what I have seen.Yeah but jbd had a pretty good couple games
He’s looked like a serviceable 6/7 without a doubt, which is what you’d hope forDid he? He’s been brutal from what I have seen.
I agree given where he was drafted; however I am still miffed at the former GM for not taking K'Andre Miller with the pick, opting instead to get JBD and Tychonik.He’s looked like a serviceable 6/7 without a doubt, which is what you’d hope for
Ah.At this point I think Brannstrom brings more to the table playing with Chychrun than JBD.
Jbd has certainly been playing better than kleven.I’d be tempted to sit JBD instead of Klevin unless they are trying to ease Branny back with 3rd pair minutes.
I see a very bright future for Klevin, but thinking Branny over JBD with Chychrun gives us the best top 4 possible with Chabot out.Ah.
So you would have Kleven and Hamonic together?
I could see that although I don't think Kleven has seemed comfortable in any game this year. He is fighting the puck and his decision making hasn't been very good.
Did he? He’s been brutal from what I have seen.
It's easy with hindsight isn't it?I agree given where he was drafted; however I am still miffed at the former GM for not taking K'Andre Miller with the pick, opting instead to get JBD and Tychonik.
I believe the lack of development with JBD is mostly due to lack of strength. You can’t play his style without being strong. If he hadHe brings the less offensively among Sens D-men but he's good at what I call "survival defense", which is what you want in a 3rd pairing D-man. His metrics aren't great except SA/60 and GA/60 which I guess is because he blocks a lot of shots and shooting lanes.
We wanted him to be a 2nd pairing D-man but he hasn't developed enough in the last 3 years, seems to be a bit of an organizational problem (playing defense and without the puck)
You'd think testing would reveal that and we've got a new strength coach so hopefully it's solvableI believe the lack of development with JBD is mostly due to lack of strength. You can’t play his style without being strong. If he had
Zub strength he’d be a fantastic option but he doesn’t so he’s replaceable. Maybe Guenette or Matinpalo can be next in line for a shot at RD.
Wanna see him with a new coach. So much indecisiveness from him but our breakout sucks assYou'd think testing would reveal that and we've got a new strength coach so hopefully it's solvable
Yes, but it was not hindsight.It's easy with hindsight isn't it?