Traded Erik Brännström - D - Part III

swiftwin

★SUMMER.OF.STEVE★
Jul 26, 2005
23,889
13,542
We’ve struggled with depth everywhere. Forwards as well. We can’t trade Joseph and give assets to move him.
You can trade kubalik if you want and lose 25 goals. His replacement, I doubt gets close to 25 goals.
Again…10 mins, not that important on this team and still very small and questionable for playoffs.
Tarasenko is Kubalik's replacement.

Besides, we'd be adding a 20 goal scorer (Pinto) to our 3rd line by moving out Kubalik anyways. How many 20 goal scorers do you need on your 3rd line? No team has this many.
 

dpw

Registered User
Jul 29, 2004
890
149
Tarasenko is Kubalik's replacement.

Besides, we'd be adding a 20 goal scorer (Pinto) to our 3rd line by moving out Kubalik anyways. How many 20 goal scorers do you need on your 3rd line? No team has this many.
Pinto got 20 playing second line role.
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,428
10,327
Montreal, Canada
When they see Pierre's number on their phone, how hard do you think other GMs laugh?

I don't think they laugh, their bodies just immediately produce serotonin massively

There's also the option of trading Forsberg IMO. Thins out our goalie depth, likely gets us a return similar to Brannstrom?

But I'm all over Option 4, but it requires Pinto to accept signing at a discount, and that's the hang-up right now...

Can't afford to trade Forsberg not only because of the Korpisalo/Forsberg situation, but also because he's more likely to give us solid goaltending consistently. Korpisalo, as we have seen last night, is just more risky.

Sorry, a few additional teams could theoretically take them on. Not Florida though, since their LTIR players will return this season.

My point stands. The pool of suitors for either Brannstrom or Joseph is very limited. These aren't attractive assets that will be easy to trade.

Maybe some team will get hit by injuries and want one of them in November, but we need to move them well before then.

Not that limited, plenty of teams would gladly take either but also are waiting for Dorion to cave in since he stupidly put himself in that situation (as usual)

The options were :

- sign only one of Tarasenko or Korpisalo
- don't take Kubalik back in the Detroit trade or just swap him right away to another team and get another asset from your DeBrincat fiasco
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emrasie

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,428
10,327
Montreal, Canada
Downgrading our 2nd 1st to a 2nd would likely be enough of a sweetener to unload Mr. 2.95 as SOA calls him. Really what’s the harm in moving from maybe 20OA to 40OA in the annual crapshoot.

The harm? It is that we have done that wayyyyyyyyy too much over the Dorion years, WHILE we were rebuilding. Take out a factual calculator and we have been bleeding assets like crazy whenwe were actually supposed to do the opposite.

Dorion is the guy in my avatar for other GMs, they are just hoping to be the next one gifted by his never ending generosity. This time Joseph and a 1st? lol I would be ecstatic if my team pull that off, contender or not.

Yep. To be specific, we are going to have to take a decent asset and give it away, with a pick attached, to compensate for the fact that our GM is a moron with zero experience in managing a cap because he has never had to do it before...

I foolishly believed Dorion had a PLAN when the offseason happened with Kubalik, Korpisalo and Tarasenko added. How naive of me :facepalm:

We have struggled for like 10 years getting good bottom pair defenceman who can play up the line up and still play good.

But now we suddenly have 3-4 of them?

Thinking that all players are equal because they play the same position would be very limited hockey understanding. Brannstrom is one of the best #5 D-men in the league and will eventually get his opportunity. Adding him to Joseph because our GM has no idea of what he is doing would be as bad as giving up a 1st round pick to create that cap space. Both options are simply awful and as an owner, I would fire my GM for even mentioning it. Trade Kubalik for whatever you can get you fool.
 

DueDiligence

Registered User
Nov 16, 2013
8,686
5,058
but what happens if one of our top 4 get injured. we just forfeit the season?

because those Brannstrom replacements are sketch NHLers, let alone top 4 caliber.
You make it seem that Brannstrom is this incredible Dman which he isn't . He's OK.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
29,546
25,041
East Coast
How many teams have a better #5? Canes, Islanders, won't do the whole 31 teams tour, so who else?
Majority, I would imagine.

Brannstrom won't even be #5 for the Sens, he's likely to be #6 in icetime again this year.

Stars - Lindell
Devils - Hughes
Caps - TVR/Feheravary
Avs - Manson
Sabres - Clifton/Johnson
Bruins - Shattenkirk/Forbert
Flames - Tanev
Canes - Take your pick
Isles - Mayfield
Stars - Lindell/Hakanpaa
Wings - Ghostibhere
Panthers - Kulikov
Wild - Goligoski/Faber/Middeleton
Nashville - Lauzon/Schenn/Fabbro
Kraken - Drumolin/Schultz
Lightning - Cernak
Vegas - Whitecloud/Martinez
Jets - Dillon/Schmidt

A bunch of teams not included I'd argue, but a good 2/3 of the league for me without a doubt
 

Xspyrit

DJ Dorion
Jun 29, 2008
31,428
10,327
Montreal, Canada
Majority, I would imagine.

Brannstrom won't even be #5 for the Sens, he's likely to be #6 in icetime again this year.

Stars - Lindell
Devils - Hughes
Caps - TVR/Feheravary
Avs - Manson
Sabres - Clifton/Johnson
Bruins - Shattenkirk/Forbert
Flames - Tanev
Canes - Take your pick
Isles - Mayfield
Stars - Lindell/Hakanpaa
Wings - Ghostibhere
Panthers - Kulikov
Wild - Goligoski/Faber/Middeleton
Nashville - Lauzon/Schenn/Fabbro
Kraken - Drumolin/Schultz
Lightning - Cernak
Vegas - Whitecloud/Martinez
Jets - Dillon/Schmidt

A bunch of teams not included I'd argue, but a good 2/3 of the league for me without a doubt

Damn, ok that will be very hard to argue... I mean looking at it quickly and seeing Erik Cernak as a #5, I don't think I can win this argument lol

I think this don't take a LOT of things in consideration like ES TOI, health, regression, EV defense, etc.

I'll try to come back on this later but damn, opened a subject that would actually take time to go further into
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: NB613 and Loach

Loach

Registered User
Jun 9, 2021
3,131
2,117
Damn, ok that will be very hard to argue... I mean looking at it quickly and seeing Erik Cernak as a #5, I don't think I can win this argument lol

I think this don't take a LOT of things in consideration like ES TOI, health, regression, EV defense, etc.

I'll try to come back on this later but damn, opened a subject that would actually take time to go further into
Owned. Owwwwned! From SlapShot.
 

Mark Stones Spleen

Trouba's elbow
Jan 17, 2008
11,112
7,466
T.O.
With DJ coaching, we only gave one top pairing dman, and that's Sanderson because he's still using his own f***ing brain.

With a normal coach, we have 3 top pairing dmen, a very good 3/4 in Zub, and a 4/5 in Branny.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
29,546
25,041
East Coast
Cernak definitely not fairly represented, he’ll be #3/4ish in minutes with Perbix and De Haan 5/6 in minutes.
 
Last edited:

DylanSensFan

BEESHIP: NBH
Aug 3, 2010
9,640
1,891
Calgary
Sorry, a few additional teams could theoretically take them on. Not Florida though, since their LTIR players will return this season.

My point stands. The pool of suitors for either Brannstrom or Joseph is very limited. These aren't attractive assets that will be easy to trade.

Maybe some team will get hit by injuries and want one of them in November, but we need to move them well before then.
Some teams aren't going to make the playoffs. Either one of these players is a trade asset at the deadline that can garner picks. I am not a fan of losing Branny or Joseph... but we do need Pinto down the center.
 

GCK

Registered User
Oct 15, 2018
16,491
10,699
Interesting that Dreger says Dorion has been trying to move Joseph or Brannstrom to make cap room. I think Branny at 2M is a tough pill.
 

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,033
5,186
The point is that Erik Cernak is not a #5 D-man lol, just to be sure you knew what I meant. Same for Lindell, etc

Cernak definitely not fairly represented, he’ll be #3/4ish in minutes with Perbix and De Haan 5/6 in minutes.

Same thing with Tanev in Calgary. Many Flames fans call him their most important D.

Lindell likely is top 3-4 in Dallas as well. A couple more on there could be argued but I'd say Brann's a middle of the road #5 right now. He does seem to play well with an elevated role though.

This year's Brannstrom IS looking like the best #5 Ottawa has had in some time. It's a low bar, I know, but it's definitely a sight for sore eyes to have third pairing that isn't a train wreck.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
29,546
25,041
East Coast
Same thing with Tanev in Calgary. Many Flames fans call him their most important D.

Lindell likely is top 3-4 in Dallas as well. A couple more on there could be argued but I'd say Brann's a middle of the road #5 right now. He does seem to play well with an elevated role though.

This year's Brannstrom IS looking like the best #5 Ottawa has had in some time. It's a low bar, I know, but it's definitely a sight for sore eyes to have third pairing that isn't a train wreck.
Whether or not either guy is their #5, #4, #3, the others slotted ahead of them right now would be better #5’s

Weegar or Zadorov in Calagray.

Harley or Haakanpa in Dallas.

Whichever of the 3 you put as their #5, they’re all better options

That’s what you want with a #5 D. A meaningful PK guy, big physical guy that can keep up, a PP specialist, etc. Brannstrom is just…there.
 
Last edited:

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,033
5,186
Whether or not either guy is their #5, #4, #3, the others slotted ahead of them right now would be better #5’s

Weegar or Zadorov in Calagray.

Harley or Haakanpa in Dallas.

Whichever of the 3 you put as their #5, they’re all better options

You could make that argument for most of those guys for sure. The Dallas guys are not significantly better, IMO, depending on what role they're asked to play.

Like I said I'd say he's a middle of the road guy where he's slotted. Especially when you consider how well he's played with a heavier workload. I'm fine with trading Brannstrom if a reasonable plan is in place. If that plan is just to throw Kleven out there I think Dorion is barking up the wrong tree.
 

BondraTime

Registered User
Nov 20, 2005
29,546
25,041
East Coast
You could make that argument for most of those guys for sure. The Dallas guys are not significantly better, IMO, depending on what role they're asked to play.

Like I said I'd say he's a middle of the road guy where he's slotted. Especially when you consider how well he's played with a heavier workload. I'm fine with trading Brannstrom if a reasonable plan is in place. If that plan is just to throw Kleven out there I think Dorion is barking up the wrong tree.
Haakanpa and Lindell were 20 minute a night guys on one of the best D in the league, and Harley has taken over a top 4 spot this year and is playing 19+ a night. Brännström barely saw 10 minutes last game, all his starts were in the offensive zone, and isn’t going to his 15 minutes avg this season without a significant injury.
 

Alf Silfversson

Registered User
Jun 8, 2011
6,033
5,186
Haakanpa and Lindell were 20 minute a night guys on one of the best D in the league, and Harley has taken over a top 4 spot this year and is playing 19+ a night. Brännström barely saw 10 minutes last game, all his starts were in the offensive zone, and isn’t going to his 15 minutes avg this season without a significant injury.

There was talk in Dallas of Harley no even making the team, so 1 game is hardly a reason to call him a top 4. Looks like he's ready but hasn't proven much. Lindell is great. Nor argument there. Haakanpaa is OK but they all play on a great team that is well coached with support all around. Not luxuries Brannstrom or any of our players have enjoyed.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad