When Babe Ruth was doing his thing, he wasnt average at pitching. And was the best in the game hitting. Go look it up. And we all want to put Ohtani "the unicorn" in the same category????
Babe Ruth pitched full time from 1915 to 1919. He did pitch somewhat after that point, but only a few innings here or there and never even 10 in any season from 1920 onward. And he had some innings in 1914 but not enough to be worth examining.
So in that 5 year stretch his bWAR for
just pitching 2.4, 8.8, 6.3, 0.8, -0.4
He started hitting full-time in 1918. Before that he was a part-time hitter with about 150 or fewer PAs in any given season. That means that he only had two overlap seasons where he was full-time at the plate and on the mound, 1918 and 1919. And his part-timer hitting seasons from 1917 prior are good, but not amazing.
his bWAR as a hitter in those two years was 4.8 and 9.1 That 1919 season is where Babe Ruth became BABE RUTH, god of hitting.
Seemingly not coincidentally those two years where he was doing both were his worst two pitching performances of his full-time run.
Babe Ruth was a good pitcher, and
then he was a good hitter (understatement. He was an unreachable super-elite tier hitter the likes of which the game has not seen since). He was never both at the same time.
Ohtani is currently, according to baseball reference, 7th in the AL in pitcher WAR and he would be top 20 in hitter WAR, their list on the leaderboard is only top 10 so I can't be sure exactly where he slots. But this isn't about him having to be elite at any one thing. It's about him being great at both things. To the extent that the value he provides to his team as a single player is greater than anyone else in baseball. Because he is both a top-half-of-the-rotation pitcher and an elite hitter.
I'm also a) not sure what your definition of "average" is in order to make a ridiculously broad claim that he's merely "avaerage" at either aspect of the game and b) puzzled by where you're getting your stats in order to claim that Matz is having a better year than him.
Ohtani the pitcher:
2.97 ERA, 3.43 FIP, 3.55 xFIP, 29.7% K rate, 9% BB rate, 1.07 WHIP
Steven Matz
3.70 ERA, 3.95 FIP, 3.66 xFIP, 21.9% K rate, 6.5% BB rate, 1.33 WHIP
Matz doesn't walk as many players. But that's about it. Oh, and he's pitched about 17 more innings while having made 5 more starts (which means that Matz is averaging like 2/3rds of an inning less per start overall. Oh and Matz has more wins, but lol pitcher-wins-as-a-measure-of-performance.
And if we compare Ohtani to the 5 most used Jays starters on the year (Ray, Ryu, Manoah, Matz, Stripling) he would be:
2nd in ERA
2nd in FIP
2nd in xFIP
2nd in K rate
last in walk rate
2nd in WHIP
All those 2nds are behind Ray and Ray alone.
So yes, he's not having a Robbie Ray pitching season. But he's having an all-star caliber pitching season and an all-star caliber hitting season
(among qualified AL batters)
1st in HR
8th in RBI
8th in runs scored
46th in AVG
19th in OBP
1st in SLG
2nd in wRC+
T-29th in doubles
7th in walks
(among starting AL pitchers with at least 110 IP, which is the highest "bucket" he's included in via Fangraphs. This sets a pool of 43 pitchers)
6th in ERA
10th in FIP
9th in xFIP
5th in Strikeout rate
33rd in walk rate
6th in WHIP
T-18 in Wins*
*again, wins are a trash measure of pitcher performance because at least half of their value is derived from run support, which is entirely outside of the pitcher's control. It's not Ohtani's fault the Angels offence is a tire fire besides him an Trout.
So Ohtani's big fault is that he walks a ton of guys. But he also doesn't give up hits and doesn't give up runs. So end result is that he's an easy top 5-10 player on both sides of the bat. No, he doesn't win the Cy Young because there are better pure pitchers. And no he probably wouldn't win a purely offensive/position player award because there's Vladdy who's a better pure hitter than him. But in the context of any single player's overall impact on the game, nobody is doing more at as high a combined level as Ohtani. And nobody ever has in any one single season.
People aren't "jumping down your throat" either. You made a definitive, authoritative, but ultimately bad take underpinned by shoddy research and a variety of somewhat contradictory and somewhat personally biased assertions and claims and people are responding to it with a similar level of fervor. That's gonna happen when you step up with a shotgunned approach of varying arugments that range from "that's really subjective" to "that's demonstrably false"