I mean cap is an issue. No doubt. Still doesn't justify these joke offers. But considering that Eichel would be your most valuable asset the moment you make that trade and is still only 24 with 5 more years on his fair contract, there is a good argument that you make the trade anyways and then worry about the cap later. Its probably worth it because the Rangers are never going to get a better player to upgrade your #1 C position once Eichel is off the table...
But yeah. Doesn't matter anyways. I expect the Kings or another team to be smart enough to take advantage of the Eichel situation (if he ever gets traded) over the Rangers anyways. Kings are a better trading partner for the Sabres and other teams might be more desperate..
Not a matter of smart as opposed to a dif of op in strategy.
Max bet on all blue chips also gives NY depth as well as affordable cap picture.
Kings ARE a better partner for this particular situation/player, because in the specific area of pivot, they have an over surplus beyond their needs. They may need help elsewhere, but they clearly DO have enough extra Cs to deal for an upgrade, unlike the Rangers who have more elcs to more positions, but not a surplus anywhere except maybe LD.
And no, would not do something around KAM for JE.
----------
Again, I'm not offering for Eichel, nor recommending Rangers do.
But an offer of Lindgren + Strome + Buch should be a value worth close to the 4 1sts being sought.
So even if it is not the currency BUF wants, it is a credible, not a garbage offer.
That is esp true if we acknowledge Eich
a) is potential injury risk esp as to neck;
and b) is an actual huge cap hit [NY should avoid becoming TOR].