If Pelech was on such a terrible team, he'd play 25+ nights too.
He's the best defenseman on the best defensive team in the league.
If Nurse was a true difference maker, he wouldn't get caved without McDavid. Over the last 2 years, he's +17 with McDavid at 5v5, but -24 without McDavid.
That's a cop out. #1 defensemen can play 25 minutes a night. Sorry but if Pelech was so dominant he would be on the ice more. He is a defensive specialist. A great one, and that is important, but a pure defensive specialist isn't a #1 defenseman any more than a pure offensive specialist like Tyson Barrie is. They have to play both ways.
You are talking in circles. If course he is -24 when playing with the bottom six that Edmonton has had to play with for the past few years. Even the best players have their defensive stats take a dive when playing with guys who aren't NHL caliber players. All these defensive stats you ar trotting out only show one thing. That Pelech plays on a far superior defensive team to Nurse.
And what's with the "caved in" metaphor. If there is any phrase that makes me start taking a poster less seriously, its seeing that cliche marched out as if it is evidence of anything.
I will sum up my opinion of your posts. You are mostly right about Pelech. He is a dominant shut down defenseman. A great situational guy. But he doesn't have the offense to be a number one. He hasn't shown it yet anyway. There's nothing wrong with that. Your biggest issue is thinking that analytics tell a good story of defensemen. Its apparent you didn't watch the Oilers this year. That's not a problem in itself, but stop acting like you are an expert when you haven't watched Nurse play this year.
One final question. If Pelech is a number 1, why didn't he want #1 defenseman money? Seems to me that even Pelech doesn't think he is a #1 defenseman. If he did, he wouldn't have left 3+ million per year on the table.