Proposal: Edm - cgy

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kresco

Registered User
Apr 10, 2016
33
1
To Edmonton
Oliver kylington
2017 2nd

To Calgary
Yakupov

Edmonton gets a defensive prospect with offensive upside,
Calgary gets a young RW to try to revive his career
 

Bryanbryoil

Pray For Ukraine
Sep 13, 2004
87,739
38,156
I'd prefer Andersson, if that'd work for you then it definitely works for me.
 

Kovaz

Registered User
Jul 1, 2014
355
39
Yakupov was reportedly available for a 3rd last trade deadline and nobody wanted him at that price. Not interested even if it was 1-for-1 for either one of those pieces, let alone both.
 

Rebuilt

Registered User
Jun 8, 2014
8,736
15
Tampa
To Edmonton
Oliver kylington
2017 2nd

To Calgary
Yakupov

Edmonton gets a defensive prospect with offensive upside,
Calgary gets a young RW to try to revive his career

No thanks. I say we hang onto Yakupov if these are the offers.
 

Some Other Flame

Registered User
Dec 4, 2010
8,037
10,333
:laugh: The Oilers aren't getting a top prospect and a 2nd for Yakupov when no team is willing to give up a 3rd round pick alone


I'd give up a 5th and a player like Bouma/Chiasson or a marginal prospect like Bruce+3rd at the most but it's pretty apparent that Yakupov's value is essentially non-existent.
 

CaptainCrunch67

Registered User
Aug 23, 2005
6,472
1,063
To Edmonton
Oliver kylington
2017 2nd

To Calgary
Yakupov

Edmonton gets a defensive prospect with offensive upside,
Calgary gets a young RW to try to revive his career

Calgary says get bent, Yak isn't even worth the 2nd round pick.
 

Snakepit

Registered User
Nov 19, 2013
6,110
1,769
Yakupov doesn't even get that 2nd, let alone a top prospect.

Only trade that makes sense for both teams is one that's been tossed around for months.

Wideman(retained salary) for Yakupov straight up
 

tmurfin

That’s the joke
May 8, 2010
11,258
1,312
At this point, Yak apparently isn't even worth that 2nd. Let alone one of our top prospects.
 

Canovin

1% is the new 11.5%
Oct 27, 2010
19,337
10,775
780
Rather hang onto Yak. But the Oilers can take Wideman off your hands if you include a throw in like Andersson/Kylington
 

Rebuilt

Registered User
Jun 8, 2014
8,736
15
Tampa
Yakupov doesn't even get that 2nd, let alone a top prospect.

Only trade that makes sense for both teams is one that's been tossed around for months.

Wideman(retained salary) for Yakupov straight up

At this point, Yak apparently isn't even worth that 2nd. Let alone one of our top prospects.

Because YOU 'say so' ?

Not very convincing. Here. Lets make it real simple

You worry about the Flames players. We will worry about our own players. Thanks in advance. :)
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,770
4,098
Calgary
Brutal.

Not even sure if we give up the 2nd little less Kylington who is raw but has very high upside. You can't trade prospects like that and not regret it. We have a glaring hole on our first line RW but not sure if he's the guy to fill it. I want someone big that wins corner battles and can plant himself in front of the net.
 

InfinityIggy

Zagidulin's Dad
Jan 30, 2011
36,236
13,184
59.6097709,16.5425901
Because YOU 'say so' ?

Not very convincing. Here. Lets make it real simple

You worry about the Flames players. We will worry about our own players. Thanks in advance. :)

I'd assume it is in reference to the fact that multiple 'insiders' have reported Yakupov's current value is below that of a 2nd round pick. Just a guess.
 

Rebuilt

Registered User
Jun 8, 2014
8,736
15
Tampa
I'd assume it is in reference to the fact that multiple 'insiders' have reported Yakupov's current value is below that of a 2nd round pick. Just a guess.

Serve up the links that say so instead of just claiming it.

Show all these 'insiders' as you claim.
 

TS Quint

Stop writing “I mean” in your posts.
Sep 8, 2012
8,569
6,077
Member when Yak was the #1 prospect in the draft? Member when he was picked #1 overall?

Oilers fans need to stop eating their member berries.
 

Seachd

Registered User
Mar 16, 2002
25,249
9,881
:laugh: The Oilers aren't getting a top prospect and a 2nd for Yakupov when no team is willing to give up a 3rd round pick alone

"Top prospect" must mean something different to you than it does to me.

I'm not sure why the Oilers would do the Flames the favour of taking Wideman so they could maybe sign Russell.
 

Snakepit

Registered User
Nov 19, 2013
6,110
1,769
Rather hang onto Yak. But the Oilers can take Wideman off your hands if you include a throw in like Andersson/Kylington

If there was a throw in (Which I doubt) it wouldn't be a top prospect. Maybe a guy like Wotherspoon (Would actually be a good add for the Oilers imo) or Kanzig
 
Sep 26, 2016
1,563
0
Yakupovs value is so low it's almost non-existant and likewise the Oilers are not going to do Calgary any favours with Widemans salary. Yak might be able to salvage a career in the NHL but not with Edmonton.
 

DJJones

Registered User
Nov 18, 2014
10,770
4,098
Calgary
If there was a throw in (Which I doubt) it wouldn't be a top prospect. Maybe a guy like Wotherspoon (Would actually be a good add for the Oilers imo) or Kanzig

Edmonton has plenty of bottom pairing guys. Too many infact
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad