JPeeper Registered User Jan 4, 2015 12,229 9,694 Oct 7, 2016 #76 There is no lols big enough for the lols I had when I saw Kylington in the proposal, let alone an added 2nd. Thread is moot anyway now that Yak was traded for a nothing prospect and a conditional 3rd. lmao just lmao
There is no lols big enough for the lols I had when I saw Kylington in the proposal, let alone an added 2nd. Thread is moot anyway now that Yak was traded for a nothing prospect and a conditional 3rd. lmao just lmao
Dertell Registered User Jul 14, 2015 2,925 479 Oct 7, 2016 #78 Draiskull said: Oilers didnt have to trade him to CGY Oilers didnt have to pick up salary (Wideman) so really not too bad .. Like most Oil fans here said.. rather lose him for nothing than do the Flames favors.. enjoy ur Wideman. Click to expand... Signing Russell before we could was more than enough for today.
Draiskull said: Oilers didnt have to trade him to CGY Oilers didnt have to pick up salary (Wideman) so really not too bad .. Like most Oil fans here said.. rather lose him for nothing than do the Flames favors.. enjoy ur Wideman. Click to expand... Signing Russell before we could was more than enough for today.
VainGretzky Registered User Jun 4, 2015 14,050 12,751 Oct 7, 2016 #79 JPeeper said: There is no lols big enough for the lols I had when I saw Kylington in the proposal, let alone an added 2nd. Thread is moot anyway now that Yak was traded for a nothing prospect and a conditional 3rd. lmao just lmao Click to expand... Conditional 2nd becomes a 3rd if he does not score 15 goals , and why is this thread still open ?
JPeeper said: There is no lols big enough for the lols I had when I saw Kylington in the proposal, let alone an added 2nd. Thread is moot anyway now that Yak was traded for a nothing prospect and a conditional 3rd. lmao just lmao Click to expand... Conditional 2nd becomes a 3rd if he does not score 15 goals , and why is this thread still open ?