Unknown Caller
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 10,332
- 7,975
I’m exhausted. I feel like I played.I'm jazzed up how am I supposed to fall asleep now
I’m exhausted. I feel like I played.I'm jazzed up how am I supposed to fall asleep now
Yeah I wasn't even entirely kidding when I said Fitz might have had an intervention before Game 3 based on Bahl being on the 4th pairing in practice yesterday and playing tonight.
agreed. if we lose game 4 i'd rather lose with that lineup, honestly.Ruff better not change a thing in game 4. Let it cook.
Hope so. I was just thinking the same thing.If Schmid is the starter we hope that is such a huge game changer. Can you imagine this team with very good goaltending instead of league average goaltending? Fingers crossed he is ready for this.
Blackwood isn't starting?Ruff better not change a thing in game 4. Let it cook.
Seems wrong. The coach is with these guys every day, he's the one the ice every practice, he's running the room, he's talking to guys about issues...then someone from upstairs is going to have a say in who plays and who doesn't?It might have been this way all year as there was talk when Shero was tossed it was going to be a collective team lead by Fitz.
Might have just got some inside baseball confirming that.
He's starting...the bus.Blackwood isn't starting?
Ruff doesn't start coaching until game 3 (regular season and post season)... it's his rope a dope strategy... let them boo you an think you suck and THEN turn it up...Might be a bit of both this always being a collaborative thing and them pushing back on Ruff for some questionable choices in Game 2
Yeah, I doubt Fitz does that regularly. Sometimes it’s justified.I mean I get involving Marty in a goalie decision regardless, but it does seem like they want a 'collaborative' approach from the top on down anyway. Which quite frankly is a good thing in this case after Lindy went full derp on Thursday.
The only pushback I ever really had toward people wanting Schmid to start from the hop was that Vitek did enough in the regular season to earn the first crack in the playoffs, not that he should play forever. Which he obviously got, but I was also screaming for Schmid to be the backup cause I knew there was a chance we'd have an early hook and I sure as shooting didn't want it to be Blackwood coming in if Vitek got lit up early.Hope so. I was just thinking the same thing.
If there’s one thing I’m legit envious of the Rangers for is that they can go from Richter to a needle in a haystack in Lundqvist to Shesterkin. They did have same pain in between Richter and Lundqvist, but it was only just a few years.
We went from to Brodeur to Schneider, which was almost too good to be true, but Schneider hurt his hip and declined too early. We thought we had that all covered with Blackwood, until we didn’t.
Vitek had an admirable season, especially as a 50+ game goalie, which I don’t think the plan was ever for him to be a 50+ game goalie. But I don’t think Vitek is a long term #1 answer either, nor was he meant to be.
Fair but what isn't is some clown in the first few posts after we won saying they didn't care and he should come out for Hughes. That's bananalands talk.My issue with Graves is more the way the coaching staff uses him than it is with Graves himself.
Seems wrong. The coach is with these guys every day, he's the one the ice every practice, he's running the room, he's talking to guys about issues...then someone from upstairs is going to have a say in who plays and who doesn't?
Seems like a bad scenario to me?
At this point, this isn’t any different than any other 2-1 series.God, I want to believe so badly
The only pushback I ever really had toward people wanting Schmid to start from the hop was that Vitek did enough in the regular season to earn the first crack in the playoffs, not that he should play forever. Which he obviously got, but I was also screaming for Schmid to be the backup cause I knew there was a chance we'd have an early hook and I sure as shooting didn't want it to be Blackwood coming in if Vitek got lit up early.
I'm guessing you're not a baseball fan...this kind of thing is commonplace there now. Managers are basically more middle management other than the few old school guys left like Bochy and Showalter. I'm not saying I like it either, but with more analytics come more people who think lineups should be based on numbers rather than gut.Seems wrong. The coach is with these guys every day, he's the one the ice every practice, he's running the room, he's talking to guys about issues...then someone from upstairs is going to have a say in who plays and who doesn't?
Seems like a bad scenario to me?
Mexican breakfast is awesome... huevos rancheros or chilaquiles
I like beans with breakfast and habaneros too.
Just have to say...its much better when we win around here haha
DEVILS WIN BABY!!! KEEP IT GOING!!!
Add in the Rangers did have some trial and error with Dan Blackburn and Al Montoya both being top-10 picks and not panning out. Blackburn hurt his hand and stopped playing pro hockey in his very early 20’s. Jason LaBarbera was also a hyped prospect for them in the early 00’s. The Mike Dunham trade was also a joke. His first year was good, but he was horrific in his second year there.Hope so. I was just thinking the same thing.
If there’s one thing I’m legit envious of the Rangers for is that they can go from Richter to a needle in a haystack in Lundqvist to Shesterkin. They did have same pain in between Richter and Lundqvist, but it was only just a few years.
We went from to Brodeur to Schneider, which was almost too good to be true, but Schneider hurt his hip and declined too early. We thought we had that all covered with Blackwood, until we didn’t.
Vitek had an admirable season, especially as a 50+ game goalie, which I don’t think the plan was ever for him to be a 50+ game goalie. But I don’t think Vitek is a long term #1 answer either, nor was he meant to be.