Isn't the question what he re-signs for in Detroit? He's not getting traded.
Horvat recent contract is a good comp: 8x8.5 sounds perfect
Horvat recent contract is a good comp: 8x8.5 sounds perfect
Horvat was traded from the west to the east.I was basing it off of the Horvat deal
Sillinger Boqvist and 2024 1st (top5 protection) I would maybe do
Why do you think Ceulemans is overrated? Wheeler came out with the CBJ prospect ranking and had Cuelemans as one of the top RHD prospects.
Im not sure that I agree.Horvat was traded from the west to the east.
Larkin is being traded within division or conference, So you can't do the Horvat trade. it's two different circumstances.
I think trades in conference, and in division cost the same as ones out of conference.Does anyone here actually think that if Horvat was dealt to Seattle. The price would be the same as the Islanders. The answer is no Seattle would be paying a higher premium just because he was dealt within the division.
You really comparing Gavrikov to Larkin?Im not sure that I agree.
I think trades in conference, and in division cost the same as ones out of conference.
Atkinson, Gaborik, Voracek, Nash trades come to mind. I don’t think those teams had to pay any more than other teams, they were just willing to meet the desired price.
If Pittsburgh wants Gavrikov at the TDL, I’m not expecting them to pay more than Toronto or a team like Seattle.
Clearly not, and to think so is almost laughable. TBH I think you shifting the discussion to this is you being a straw man.You really comparing Gavrikov to Larkin?
That dude is full on delusional. He is very clearly the red wings version of a crazy leafs fan.Clearly not, and to think so is almost laughable. TBH I think you shifting the discussion to this is you being a straw man.
I am comparing them in the sense that if they were being traded due to them not being re-signed by their current teams, the conference/division they are going to has little to no impact on their value. They would be traded to the the team offering the most.
he's going to retire and Detroit will be retiring the offensive-zone blueline in his honour
larkin is just an overhyped high-end 2c. 1st round pick is the main piece.Knies is a B prospect that Leaf fans have overhyped now that they know Robertson ain’t shit.
Knies isn’t worth Larkin’s jock strap.
Liljegren through progression will be the one to replace holls minutes, especially on the pk. Holl is solid but he's certainly not irreplaceable.Are you paying Holl? I know most Leaf fans on the main boards don’t understand this but he might be the best defenseman on the team. He plays top pair minutes on what has been a pretty great defensive team. He’s going to get paid.
And before one of you replies with “he will get replaced with Timmy or Sandin”, you’re out of your mind if you think either of those two is anywhere near as good as Holl.
knies isnt needed. this is larkin were talking about. unless you're looking to move seider the 2023 1st is the main piece.
cap could be tricky. but dubas could figure it out.
I'd take the 6 x 4! lol. Anyone who makes 100k a year out there....it would take you 240 years to earn 24 mil.
Perspective.
I agree with your points though.
It is a good comparable, but I'm not sure Sandin is of need, LHD is a position of strength in the organization. Swap Sandin for Liljegren maybe? Even then, I'm not sure it would be the best offer, especially in division.
no one else on the wings is worth moving knies for at the moment. if you want knies you have to give to get.
larkin for the 1st, 3rd and a prospect like niemela might be the top offer. with retention obviously.
Very little reason for him to get less than Horvat now unless he takes a hometown discount.Unclear why deal not done yet.
I'm sensing 8.6 x 5
longer term 7.75 x 8
so #s suggest longer term around 8,25
Once you see what your peers make you’d want to be compensated at the level you believe that your worth is. Doesn’t matter the profession.Knies is not that highly ranked a prospect. Just because he is the Leafs top prospect doesn't mean he is highly rated league wide. Late 2nd round pick, who has normal good college stats.
You wouldn't take 6 x 4 if you know nearly 32 teams would pay that and much more though. I would take 250,000 a year to play hockey, but that is because I make nowhere close to that, so that is a boatload to play a game.
The primary difference is gate driven revenue. I also hope the NHL never becomes the NBA or NFL.Once you see what your peers make you’d want to be compensated at the level you believe that your worth is. Doesn’t matter the profession.
This is what nhlers who are approaching ufa get. Reality of their industry. Nba players who get the super max deal are getting $40 mill plus a season. Top QBs are into that range as well.
agreed, if cap not an issue he'd get > 9/9+Very little reason for him to get less than Horvat now unless he takes a hometown discount.
Could certainly happen with him being C of his childhood team
He’s not replaceable by Timmy. That’s ridiculous.Liljegren through progression will be the one to replace holls minutes, especially on the pk. Holl is solid but he's certainly not irreplaceable.
No your assessment is ridiculous. Like I said Holl doesn't deserve the crap he gets, he's a solid 4 or 5. Not a 2 or a 3 that can change a D core.He’s not replaceable by Timmy. That’s ridiculous.
Timmy will never be as good as Holl is today. Timmy isn’t leap frogging 4 players in the Leafs without that being a big downgrade.No your assessment is ridiculous. Like I said Holl doesn't deserve the crap he gets, he's a solid 4 or 5. Not a 2 or a 3 that can change a D core.
Your assessment is pretty bad considering Timmy is an overall better player then Holl right now. I don't know if maybe you are related to holl but he isn't as good as you claim and lacks the consistency year to year to be a really good top 4 D.Timmy will never be as good as Holl is today. Timmy isn’t leap frogging 4 players in the Leafs without that being a big downgrade.
Yeah, you are arguing agains real life results with Holl playing top pair on a pretty good defensive team with hope and prayers that suddenly Timmy is better. They better fire Dubas and Keefe if your thoughts and prayers are going to come true.Your assessment is pretty bad considering Timmy is an overall better player then Holl right now. I don't know if maybe you are related to holl but he isn't as good as you claim and lacks the consistency year to year to be a really good top 4 D.
You can make all the claims you like, but until you can actually prove it with stats all you are doing is giving an opinion and not a very good one at that.Yeah, you are arguing agains real life results with Holl playing top pair on a pretty good defensive team with hope and prayers that suddenly Timmy is better. They better fire Dubas and Keefe if your thoughts and prayers are going to come true.
If what insiders say is true (debatable) and the Leafs pick up a defenseman and they get healthy Timmy is fighting for his life just to stay in the line up. Holl will still be a a top pair on the team.
So many Leafs fans are in denial to what is actually happening on the team To make them successful. it sure isn’t their bottom pair defensemen. But pLaY tHe YoUtH!!!!!
He's talking with a leafs fan that is saying Knies is more valuable than Seider, and you're calling HIM delusional??That dude is full on delusional. He is very clearly the red wings version of a crazy leafs fan.
Claims? Are the Leafs not a top defensive team? Can’t you open NHL.com? Do you need help?You can make all the claims you like, but until you can actually prove it with stats all you are doing is giving an opinion and not a very good one at that.